Incumbents' Advantages in the 1978 U. S. Congressional Elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7329587 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gary C Jacobson (0000-0001-6392-839X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 183-183 |
| Publication date | 1981-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Legislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/439644 |
| OpenAlex | W2325758249 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 37 |
| References cited | 10 |
The 1978 National Election Study has provided us with a wide variety of data to help explain the advantages that incumbents have recently enjoyed in elections for the U.S. House. The incumbent has advantages over challengers in levels of familiarity, frequency of contact, and evaluations; contestants for open seats rank between incumbents and challengers on these items. An analysis of variables related to voting decisions shows that incumbents benefit from many different things that they do: advertising, credit claiming on services, and position taking on issues, as well as development of a home style that enhances their image. They also benefit from having obscure, inexperienced opponents who are usually short of resources and therefore do not become familiar to voters
Economics · Political economy · Political science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics
Voting in Senate Elections
Communication Forms as Predictors of Issue Knowledge in Presidential Campaigns
Tempus Edax Rerum
The electoral consequences of racial fluidity
Incumbency effects in U.S. presidential campaigns
The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections
Understanding public blame attributions when private contractors are responsible for civilian casualties
Does Corruption Follow Opportunity? A Study of the U.S. Congress
The Missing Beat
Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections
Closing the Gap
The 1980 House Elections
The Case of the Missing Reciprocal Influence
The Effect of Primary Divisiveness in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections
Congressmen, Perquisites, and Elections
Tempus Fugit, Incumbency Stays
The Image and the Vote
The Marginals Never Vanished
The Pro-Incumbent Bias in the 1978 and 1980 National Election Studies
The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections
Explaining Congressional Casework Styles
Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions
Incumbency Advantage and Tenure Length in the Chilean Chamber of Deputies, 1989-2009
Elecciones primarias y personalización de la política
Gasto en campaña y éxito electoral de los candidatos a diputados en chile 2005
The Incumbency Advantage in the US Congress
Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections
Does the Candidate Matter? Comparing the Voting Choice of Early and Late Deciders
Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage
What They Do Does Matter
Social media homophily among women and men political candidates
Who Franks? Explaining the Allocation of Official Resources
Recent Research on “Incumbency Advantage” in House Elections
Porque dinheiro importa
Positional effects of partisan attachments on candidate position taking
Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates
Are Majority Minority Districts Too Safe
Unsafe at any margin
Home Style
Name Familiarity, Reputation, and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election
Congress
Party Government and the Saliency of Congress
The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections
One Good Term Deserves Another
The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964-1974
Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections
| Unique citing works | 37 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,86 |
| Citation span | 1983 - 2025 (43) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 37 |