Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Incumbents' Advantages in the 1978 U. S. Congressional Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID7329587
AuthorsGary C Jacobson (0000-0001-6392-839X, corresponding author)
Year1981
Volume6
Issue2
Pages183-183
Publication date1981-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/439644
OpenAlexW2325758249
LanguageEN
Citations received37
References cited10

The 1978 National Election Study has provided us with a wide variety of data to help explain the advantages that incumbents have recently enjoyed in elections for the U.S. House. The incumbent has advantages over challengers in levels of familiarity, frequency of contact, and evaluations; contestants for open seats rank between incumbents and challengers on these items. An analysis of variables related to voting decisions shows that incumbents benefit from many different things that they do: advertising, credit claiming on services, and position taking on issues, as well as development of a home style that enhances their image. They also benefit from having obscure, inexperienced opponents who are usually short of resources and therefore do not become familiar to voters

Economics · Political economy · Political science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • Voting in Senate Elections

    E G Carmines, Richard A Champagne•Congress & the Presidency•1990

  • Communication Forms as Predictors of Issue Knowledge in Presidential Campaigns

    Glenn J Hansen, William L Benoit•Mass Communication & Society•2007

  • Tempus Edax Rerum

    Open Access•Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer•The Social Science Journal•2012

  • The electoral consequences of racial fluidity

    Open Access•Antoni Janusz•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Incumbency effects in U.S. presidential campaigns

    Open Access•Christian Leuprecht, David B Skillicorn•Electoral Studies•2016

  • The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Understanding public blame attributions when private contractors are responsible for civilian casualties

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez•Policy Sciences•2020

  • Does Corruption Follow Opportunity? A Study of the U.S. Congress

    Rodrigo Praino, Adam Graycar•Public Integrity•2018

  • The Missing Beat

    Charles M Tidmarch, Brad S Karp•Congress & the Presidency•1983

  • Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

    Jon R Bond, Cary R Covington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Closing the Gap

    Melina R Platas, Pia J Raffler•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • The 1980 House Elections

    John Mcadams, John C Mcadams et al.•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • The Case of the Missing Reciprocal Influence

    David W Romero•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • The Effect of Primary Divisiveness in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections

    Patrick J Kenney, Tom W Rice•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Congressmen, Perquisites, and Elections

    John Mcadams, John C Mcadams et al.•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • Tempus Fugit, Incumbency Stays

    Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • The Image and the Vote

    Shawn W Rosenberg, Shawn Rosenberg et al.•American Journal of Political…•1986

  • The Marginals Never Vanished

    Gary C Jacobson•American Journal of Political…•1987

  • The Pro-Incumbent Bias in the 1978 and 1980 National Election Studies

    Robert B Eubank, David John Gow•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections

    Keith Krehbiel, John Wright et al.•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Explaining Congressional Casework Styles

    John R Johannes•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions

    Lyn Ragsdale, Timothy E Cook•American Journal of Political…•1987

  • Incumbency Advantage and Tenure Length in the Chilean Chamber of Deputies, 1989-2009

    Open Access•Kenneth Bunker, Patricio Navia•Revista de ciencia política•2015

  • Elecciones primarias y personalización de la política

    Open Access•Carlos Cantillana Peña, Gonzalo Contreras Aguirre et al.•Revista de ciencia política•2015

  • Gasto en campaña y éxito electoral de los candidatos a diputados en chile 2005

    Open Access•Mauricio Morales Quiroga, Rafael Piñeiro Rodríguez et al.•Revista de ciencia política•2010

  • The Incumbency Advantage in the US Congress

    Open Access•Daniel Stockemer, Rodrigo Praino•Politics•2012

  • Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Melinda Gann Hall•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Does the Candidate Matter? Comparing the Voting Choice of Early and Late Deciders

    Open Access•Patrizia Catellani, Augusta Isabella Alberici•Political Psychology•2012

  • Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•David L Eckles, Cindy D Kam et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • What They Do Does Matter

    Open Access•David W Romero•Political Behavior•2006

  • Social media homophily among women and men political candidates

    Open Access•Iulia Cioroianu, H Coffe•Parliamentary Affairs•2025

  • Who Franks? Explaining the Allocation of Official Resources

    Craig Goodman, David C W Parker•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • Recent Research on “Incumbency Advantage” in House Elections

    Richard S Beth•Congress & the Presidency•1984

  • Porque dinheiro importa

    Open Access•Leany Barreiro Lemos, Leany Barreiro De S Lemos et al.•Opinião Pública•2010

  • Positional effects of partisan attachments on candidate position taking

    Open Access•Woojin Moon•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates

    Open Access•James Garand, James C Garand et al.•American Political Science Review•1984

  • Are Majority Minority Districts Too Safe

    Open Access•Brandon R Davis•Du Bois Review Social Science…•2019

  • Unsafe at any margin

    Thomas E Mann•Unsafe at any margin•1978

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • Name Familiarity, Reputation, and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Party Government and the Saliency of Congress

    Donald E Stokes, Donald Stokes et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1962

  • The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections

    Robert S Erikson•Polity•1971

  • One Good Term Deserves Another

    Albert D Cover•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964-1974

    Open Access•Candice J Nelson•Political Science Quarterly•1978

  • Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Thomas E Mann, Raymond E Wolfinger•American Political Science Review•1980

Unique citing works37
Citations per year0,86
Citation span1983 - 2025 (43)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 37

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae