Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How many political parties are there, really? A new measure of the ideologically cognizable number of parties/party groupings

Bibliographic Data

ID6315977
AuthorsB Grofman (0000-0002-2801-3351, University of California, USA), Ronald Kline (0000-0003-1874-4975, University of California, USA), Reuben Kline
Year2012
Volume18
Issue4
Pages523-544
Publication date2012-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1354068810386838
OpenAlexW2146323367
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited36

We offer a new measure of the ideologically cognizable number of political parties/party groupings that is intended to be complementary to the standard approach to counting the effective number of political parties – the Laakso–Taagepera index (1979). This approach allows the possibility of precise measurement of concepts such as polarized pluralism or fragmented bipolarism and is applicable to both unidimensional and multidimensional representations of party locations. Using recent CSES (Comparative Study of Electoral Systems) data on one-dimensional representations of party locations in four real-world examples (two of which are available in an online appendix), we find that Slovenia, treated initially as a five-party system, has its optimal reduction as a two-bloc/party system, as does Spain, which is treated initially as a four-party system. However, Canada, treated initially as a four-party system, has its optimal reduction as a three-bloc/party system if we look at a unidimensional representation of the party space, while it remains a four-bloc system if we draw on Johnston’s two-dimensional characterization of Canadian political competition. Finally, the Czech Republic, initially a five-party system, is optimally reduced to a system with four party groupings

Democracy · Epistemology · Ideology · Law and economics · Parliament · Party platform · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Political system · Politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Philosophy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

  • Extending the Laakso-Taagepera Index to integrate both party and ethnicity

    Open Access•B Grofman, Jon Fraenkel•Party Politics•2022

  • Measuring Two-Partyness

    Open Access•Grigorii V Golosov•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • How policy agendas change when autocracies liberalize

    Open Access•Nick H K Or•Public Administration•2019

  • What Makes Party Systems Different? A Principal Component Analysis of 17 Advanced Democracies 1970–2013

    Open Access•Zsuzsanna Magyar•Political Analysis•2022

  • Perspectives on the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems

    B Grofman•Annual Review of Political Science•2016

  • The study of coalition behavior

    Sven Groennings•The study of coalition behavior•1970

  • The theory of political coalitions.

    William H Riker•The theory of political coalitions.•1962

  • Parties and Party Systems

    Giovanni Sartori•When Political Parties Die•2010

  • Multiparty Democracy

    Open Access•Norman Schofield, Itai Sened et al.•Multiparty Democracy•2006

  • Mapping Policy Preferences ii

    Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Hans‐dieter Klingemann et al.•Mapping policy preferences II•2006

  • Elections, Parties, Democracy

    Michael D Mcdonald, Ian Budge•Elections, parties, democracy•2005

  • Mapping Policy Preferences

    Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann et al.•Mapping policy preferences•2001

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Cabinet Coalition Formation

    Mark Winer•Applied Game Theory•1979

  • Why Party Leaders are More Extreme than Their Members

    Open Access•Anthony J Mcgann, B Grofman et al.•Public Choice•2002

  • The kernel and payoffs in European government coalitions

    Open Access•Norman Schofield•Public Choice•1976

  • The Variance Matters

    Lawrence Ezrow•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • The Italian Party System between Parties and Coalitions

    Bartolini, Stefano Bartolini et al.•West European Politics•2004

  • Party System Compactness

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, Jonathan Nagler•Political Analysis•2004

  • Constructing the Number of Parties

    Open Access•Patrick Dunleavy, Françoise Boucek•Party Politics•2003

  • The Effect of Dominant and Central Parties on Cabinet Composition and Durability

    Open Access•Peter Van Roozendaal•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1992

  • Coalition Politics

    Open Access•Norman Schofield•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1995

  • Left–Right Political Scales

    Open Access•Francis G Castles, Peter Mair•European Journal of Political…•1984

  • Dominant players and minimum size coalitions

    Open Access•A M A Van Deemen•European Journal of Political…•1989

  • Effective” Number of Parties

    Open Access•Markku Laakso, Rein Taagepera•Comparative Political Studies•1979

  • The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems

    Open Access•Russell J Dalton•Comparative Political Studies•2008

  • The Measurement of Hyperfractionalization

    Open Access•John K Wildgen•Comparative Political Studies•1971

  • Polarized Pluralism in the Canadian Party System

    Open Access•Richard Johnston•Canadian Journal of Political…•2008

  • Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies

    Open Access•John D Huber, John Huber et al.•Party Politics•1995

  • A Theory of Coalition Formation

    William A Gamson•American Sociological Review•1961

  • How we count counts

    Open Access•Ronald Kline, Reuben Kline•Electoral Studies•2009

  • Reformulating the Cube Law for Proportional Representation Elections

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•American Political Science Review•1986

  • The Competitive Solution for N-Person Games Without Transferable Utility, With an Application to Committee Games

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Peter C Ordeshook et al.•American Political Science Review•1978

  • A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System

    Open Access•L S Shapley, Martin Shubik•American Political Science Review•1954

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2016 - 2025 (10)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae