Do Soldiers Get a Say? Soldiers’ Views and Public Support for Military Operations in Four Democracies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6322729 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ronald R Krebs (0000-0001-6504-060X, University of Birmingham), Robert Ralston (0000-0002-4470-1242, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris), Thierry Balzacq (0000-0002-4242-5088, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris), David Blagden (0000-0001-6923-4946, University of Exeter), Shaul Shenhav (0000-0002-8820-3579, Jerusalem University College) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537592724002214 |
| OpenAlex | W4406405583 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 78 |
When deciding whether to support a military operation, do citizens in democracies weigh whether soldiers themselves support the operation? Recent research has concluded that, in the United States, public support for military operations rests in part on people’s beliefs that soldiers favor their own deployment. However, it is not known whether this finding extends beyond the United States to democracies with diverse national citizenship discourses and threat profiles, and its theoretical basis is not well understood. This article addresses both these gaps. Using novel survey data and an experiment in four democracies with divergent citizenship traditions—France, Israel, the United Kingdom, and the United States—we show that, in all four nations, support for military operations depends significantly on whether people believe that soldiers themselves favor the operation. We highlight two reasons: (1) battlefield performance (respondents think that soldiers who favor their mission fight better), and (2) soldier consent (humans’ capacity for empathy makes them sensitive to whether soldiers are willingly sent into harm’s way). This article has significant implications for debates on public support for the use of military force, the nature of citizenship in modern democracies, and contemporary militarism
Military personnel · Political science · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Military History and Strategy · Psychology
The postmodern military
Choosing your battles
Dangerous Instrument
Divided Armies
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
In Time of War
The Rational Public
The Casualty Gap
Armed Servants
Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior
Explaining Conservative Beliefs and Political Preferences
The New American Militarism
Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism
Narrative and the Making of US National Security
Twilight of the Citizen-Soldier
Uninformed Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It
The American Language of Rights
Contemporary Social Psychological Theories
Soldiers and Civilians
Gratitude as moral sentiment
Thinking generically and specifically in International Relations survey experiments
Dependence and Risk
Success Matters
Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power
The Right to Be Right
The Definite End of the Mass Army in Western Europe
Abstraction and Detail in Experimental Design
Names from Nowhere? Fictitious Country Names in Survey Vignettes Affect Experimental Results
Race, Casualties, and Opinion in the Vietnam War
Moral Support
Drafting Support for War
A War of One's Own
How Citizens Respond to Combat Casualties
The Problem of Political Obligation
The Power of Humanitarian Narratives
Precision Weapons, Civilian Casualties, and Support for the Use of Force
No Right to Be Wrong
Still Pretty Prudent
When War Hits Home
Conscription, Inequality, and Partisan Support for War
Armies and Influence
The Pretty Prudent Public
Why They Fight
Military Alliances and Public Support for War
Life and Limb
Domestic Institutions and Wartime Casualties1
Reality Asserts Itself
What's in a Name? Metaphors and Cybersecurity
A Bottom‐Up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy
Measuring individual differences in empathy
What Is Liberalism
Patterns of militarism in Israel
The Norm of Reciprocity
Ties to the Dead
The Roots of Reciprocity
Public Support for Peacekeeping in Lebanon and Somalia
Race, Gender, and War
Toward Post-Heroic Warfare
The Machiavellian Moment
From Institution to Occupation
The Decline of the Mass Army in the West
Citizenship Traditions and Cultures of Military Service
Who Should the Military Recruit? The Effects of Institutional, Occupational, and Self-Enhancement Enlistment Motives on Soldier Identification and Behavior
Elite Military Cues and Public Opinion About the Use of Military Force
The Citizen-Soldier Tradition in the United States
Generalized Exchange
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |