Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do Soldiers Get a Say? Soldiers’ Views and Public Support for Military Operations in Four Democracies

Bibliographic Data

ID6322729
AuthorsRonald R Krebs (0000-0001-6504-060X, University of Birmingham), Robert Ralston (0000-0002-4470-1242, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris), Thierry Balzacq (0000-0002-4242-5088, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris), David Blagden (0000-0001-6923-4946, University of Exeter), Shaul Shenhav (0000-0002-8820-3579, Jerusalem University College)
Year2025
Pages1-20
Publication date2025-01-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerspectives on Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1537592724002214
OpenAlexW4406405583
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited78

When deciding whether to support a military operation, do citizens in democracies weigh whether soldiers themselves support the operation? Recent research has concluded that, in the United States, public support for military operations rests in part on people’s beliefs that soldiers favor their own deployment. However, it is not known whether this finding extends beyond the United States to democracies with diverse national citizenship discourses and threat profiles, and its theoretical basis is not well understood. This article addresses both these gaps. Using novel survey data and an experiment in four democracies with divergent citizenship traditions—France, Israel, the United Kingdom, and the United States—we show that, in all four nations, support for military operations depends significantly on whether people believe that soldiers themselves favor the operation. We highlight two reasons: (1) battlefield performance (respondents think that soldiers who favor their mission fight better), and (2) soldier consent (humans’ capacity for empathy makes them sensitive to whether soldiers are willingly sent into harm’s way). This article has significant implications for debates on public support for the use of military force, the nature of citizenship in modern democracies, and contemporary militarism

Military personnel · Political science · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Military History and Strategy · Psychology

  • From battlefield to living room

    Open Access•Oren Cohen Zada•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Uniform for All? A Framing Experiment on the Acceptance of a Gender‐Neutral Compulsory Service in Switzerland

    Open Access•Johanna Hornung, Basil Vifian et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2025

  • Chaplains and the legitimacy of drone warfare

    Open Access•Paul Lushenko, Keith L Carter•Politics and Religion•2025

  • The postmodern military

    Charles C Moskos, David R Segal et al.•The postmodern military•2000

  • Choosing your battles

    Christopher Gelpi, Peter D Feaver et al.•Choosing your battles•2004

  • Dangerous Instrument

    Michael A Robinson, Michael Robinson•Dangerous Instrument•2022

  • Divided Armies

    James Lyall, Jason Lyall•Divided Armies•2020

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • In Time of War

    Adam J Berinsky•In Time of War•2009

  • The Rational Public

    Benjamin I Page, Robert Y Shapiro•The Rational Public•1992

  • The Casualty Gap

    Douglas L Kriner, Douglas Kriner et al.•The casualty gap•2010

  • Armed Servants

    Peter D Feaver, Peter Feaver•Armed Servants•2003

  • Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior

    Open Access•Monica Y Bartlett, David Desteno•Psychological Science•2006

  • Explaining Conservative Beliefs and Political Preferences

    Open Access•Alain Van Hiel, Ivan Mervielde•Journal of Applied Social…•2002

  • The New American Militarism

    Andrew J Bacevich•The New American Militarism•2005

  • Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism

    Open Access•Margaret Levi•Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism•1997

  • Narrative and the Making of US National Security

    Open Access•Ronald R Krebs•Narrative and the Making of US…•2015

  • Twilight of the Citizen-Soldier

    Eliot A Cohen•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2001

  • Uninformed Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It

    Arthur Lupia•Uninformed•2016

  • The American Language of Rights

    Open Access•Richard A Primus•American Language of Rights•1999

  • Contemporary Social Psychological Theories

    Peter J Burke•Contemporary Social Psychological…•2020

  • Soldiers and Civilians

    Peter Karsten, Peter D Feaver et al.•The Journal of Military History•2002

  • Gratitude as moral sentiment

    David Desteno, Monica Y Bartlett et al.•Emotion•2010

  • Thinking generically and specifically in International Relations survey experiments

    Open Access•Clara H Suong, Scott Desposato et al.•Research & Politics•2023

  • Dependence and Risk

    Linda D Molm•Social Psychology Quarterly•1994

  • Success Matters

    Christopher Gelpi, Peter D Feaver et al.•International Security•2005

  • Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power

    Barry R Posen•International Security•1993

  • The Right to Be Right

    Peter D Feaver, Peter Feaver•International Security•2011

  • The Definite End of the Mass Army in Western Europe

    Open Access•Karl W Haltiner•Armed Forces & Society•1998

  • Abstraction and Detail in Experimental Design

    Open Access•Ryan Brutger, Joshua D Kertzer et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Names from Nowhere? Fictitious Country Names in Survey Vignettes Affect Experimental Results

    Open Access•Jacklyn Majnemer, Gustav Meibauer•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Race, Casualties, and Opinion in the Vietnam War

    Scott Sigmund Gartner, Gary M Segura•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Moral Support

    Joshua D Kertzer, Kathleen E Powers et al.•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Drafting Support for War

    Michael C Horowitz, Matthew S Levendusky et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • A War of One's Own

    Deborah Jordan Brooks, Benjamin A Valentino•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • How Citizens Respond to Combat Casualties

    Douglas L Kriner, Francis X Shen•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • The Problem of Political Obligation

    Open Access•Richard Dagger•Political Theory•1980

  • The Power of Humanitarian Narratives

    Open Access•Sarah Maxey•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Precision Weapons, Civilian Casualties, and Support for the Use of Force

    Open Access•James I Walsh•Political Psychology•2015

  • No Right to Be Wrong

    Open Access•Ronald R Krebs, Robert Ralston et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2023

  • Still Pretty Prudent

    Open Access•Bruce W Jentleson, Rebecca L Britton•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1998

  • When War Hits Home

    Open Access•Scott L Althau, Scott L Althaus et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2012

  • Conscription, Inequality, and Partisan Support for War

    Open Access•Douglas L Kriner, Francis X Shen•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2016

  • Armies and Influence

    Open Access•Tyler Jost, Joshua D Kertzer•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2024

  • The Pretty Prudent Public

    Bruce W Jentleson•International Studies Quarterly•1992

  • Why They Fight

    Open Access•Ronald R Krebs, Robert Ralston et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Military Alliances and Public Support for War

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Jessica L P Weeks•International Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Life and Limb

    Open Access•Tanisha M Fazal•International Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Domestic Institutions and Wartime Casualties1

    Open Access•Michael C Horowitz, Erin M Simpson et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Reality Asserts Itself

    Open Access•Matthew A Baum, Tim Groeling•International Organization•2010

  • What's in a Name? Metaphors and Cybersecurity

    Open Access•Jordan Branch•International Organization•2021

  • A Bottom‐Up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy

    Open Access•Joshua D Kertzer, Thomas Zeitzoff•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Measuring individual differences in empathy

    Mark H Davis•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • What Is Liberalism

    Open Access•Duncan Bell•Political Theory•2014

  • Patterns of militarism in Israel

    Open Access•Baruch Kimmerling•European Journal of Sociology•1993

  • The Norm of Reciprocity

    Alvin W Gouldner•American Sociological Review•1960

  • Ties to the Dead

    Open Access•Scott Sigmund Gartner•American Sociological Review•2008

  • The Roots of Reciprocity

    Open Access•B Simpson, Ashley Harrell et al.•American Sociological Review•2018

  • Public Support for Peacekeeping in Lebanon and Somalia

    Open Access•James Burk•Political Science Quarterly•1999

  • Race, Gender, and War

    Open Access•Miroslav Nincic, Donna J Nincic•Journal of Peace Research•2002

  • Toward Post-Heroic Warfare

    Edward N Luttwak, Edward Ν Luttwak•Foreign Affairs•1995

  • The Machiavellian Moment

    John Greville Agard Pocock, John Greville Agard Greville Agard Pocock•Machiavellian Moment•2009

  • From Institution to Occupation

    Open Access•Charles C Moskos•Armed Forces & Society•1977

  • The Decline of the Mass Army in the West

    Open Access•Jacques Van Doorn•Armed Forces & Society•1975

  • Citizenship Traditions and Cultures of Military Service

    Open Access•Ronald R Krebs, Robert Ralston et al.•Armed Forces & Society•2024

  • Who Should the Military Recruit? The Effects of Institutional, Occupational, and Self-Enhancement Enlistment Motives on Soldier Identification and Behavior

    Open Access•Todd D Woodruff, Todd Woodruff•Armed Forces & Society•2017

  • Elite Military Cues and Public Opinion About the Use of Military Force

    Open Access•James Golby, Peter Feaver et al.•Armed Forces & Society•2018

  • The Citizen-Soldier Tradition in the United States

    Open Access•Ronald R Krebs•Armed Forces & Society•2009

  • Generalized Exchange

    P Bearman•American Journal of Sociology•1997

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae