Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond the Harm Principle

Bibliographic Data

ID6325462
AuthorsArthur Ripstein (0000-0002-3562-5065, University of Toronto, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume34
Issue3
Pages215-245
Publication date2006-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy & Public Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0048-3915 • E-ISSN: 1088-4963
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00066.x
OpenAlexW2142097096
LanguageEN
Citations received42
References cited4

In On Liberty, just a few sentences after he introduces his famous "harm principle," John Stuart Mill writes "The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is answerable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his body and mind, the individual is sovereign." My aim is to argue that a commitment to individual sovereignty and a sphere of action in which you are answerable only to yourself requires that we abandon the harm principle.The only way to unseat a time honoured principle is to provide a superior alternative. Following the sentence of Mill just quoted, I will call the alternative "the sovereignty principle." Liberalism is fundamentally a doctrine about the legitimate uses of state power, and the sovereignty principle articulates the basis for those limits in terms of ideas of individuality and independence. It provides a narrow rationale for the legitimate use of state power, and precludes other proposed bases. I explain why its conception of freedom is not subject to certain familiar objections, ones that have historically driven some to embrace the harm principle. Before doing so, I show that narrowly construed, the harm principle fails to account for a significant and familiar class of wrongs that most liberals would agree merit prohibition

Action (physics · Harm · Harm principle · Law and economics · Mill · Physics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Free Will and Agency · History · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Can Contractualism Save Us from Aggregation?

    Open Access•Barbara H Fried•The Journal of Ethics•2012

  • Human Rights as Legal Rights

    Pavlos Eleftheriadis•Transnational Legal Theory•2010

  • Wronging Future People

    Rahul Kumar•Intergenerational justice•2009

  • Independence for Children

    Matthew Clayton•Independence for Children•2025

  • Morality and Socially Constructed Norms

    Laura Valentini•Morality and Socially Constructed…•2023

  • Respect for persons and the moral force of socially constructed norms

    Open Access•Laura Valentini•Noûs•2021

  • Is consent to psychological interventions less important than consent to bodily interventions

    Open Access•Lisa Forsberg, Thomas Douglas et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Kantian Perspectives on Drug Use and Drug Criminalization

    Open Access•P G Johnstad•Criminal Justice Ethics•2026

  • An Intuitive, Abductive Argument for a Right against Mental Interference

    Open Access•Thomas Douglas•The Journal of Ethics•2025

  • Please wear a mask

    Open Access•Roberto Fumagalli•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Toward Social Justification for Pecuniary and Other Externalities

    Open Access•Nicholas Meetze, Matthew Caulfield•Journal of Business Ethics•2026

  • Something Is Okay

    Open Access•Søren Flinch Midtgaard•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2026

  • Reparative justice, historical injustice, and the nonidentity problem

    Open Access•Francis Lambrecht•Journal of Social Philosophy•2026

  • Value-based accounts of normative powers and the wishful thinking objection

    Open Access•Daniele Bruno•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Imagining in Oppressive Contexts, or What’s Wrong with Blackface

    Robin Zheng, Nils-Hennes Stear•Ethics•2023

  • Minimum pricing for alcohol

    Ben Saunder•Contemporary Social Science•2013

  • Institutional response to criminalization decisions

    Open Access•Javier Wilenmann•International journal of law,…•2017

  • Labour injustice, protectionism, and transnational solidarity

    Sylvie Loriaux•Journal of Global Ethics•2026

  • Deportation, harms, and human rights

    Open Access•Lisa Schmid•Ethics & Global Politics•2021

  • Defining harm

    Open Access•Nico Vorster•Verbum et Ecclesia•2021

  • Property, nature, and the freedom to roam

    Open Access•David Rischel•Critical Review of International…•2024

  • What liberals should tolerate internationally

    Andrew Jason Cohen•Critical Review of International…•2019

  • Is there a global harm principle

    Richard Vernon•Critical Review of International…•2009

  • A Soft Defense of a Utilitarian Principle of Criminalization

    Open Access•Thomas Søbirk Petersen•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2019

  • Assessing Baselines for Identifying Harm

    Open Access•Monique Jonas•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2015

  • The Incompleteness of ‘Punishment as Fair Play’

    Open Access•Antony Duff•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2008

  • Essential services, public education workers, and the right to strike

    Open Access•Cristian Pérez Muñóz•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • A Feminist Analysis of the Harm Principle

    Open Access•Claire Stimpson•Alternative Law Journal•2013

  • Is Fair Trade a fair deal

    Tilford Brooks•Cambridge Review of International…•2015

  • Deepfakes at face value

    Open Access•James Ravi Kirkpatrick, J W Kirkpatrick•AI & Society•2026

  • John Stuart Mill and the Contagious Diseases Acts

    Open Access•Jim Jose, Kcasey Mcloughlin•Law and History Review•2016

  • Evolution, Morality and the Fabric of Society

    Open Access•Robert P Thompson•Evolution, Morality and the…•2022

  • On being wronged and being wrong

    Open Access•Adam Slavny•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2017

  • Immigration enforcement and justifications for causing harm

    Kevin K W Ip•Critical Review of International…•2022

  • Urban visual representation and ethical narrative risks

    Open Access•Yan Chen, Yanchun Chen et al.•Cities•2025

  • AI, Radical Ignorance, and the Institutional Approach to Consent

    Open Access•Etye Steinberg•Philosophy & Technology•2024

  • Interests, Wrongs, and the Injury Hypothesis

    Open Access•Richard Healey•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2017

  • Problems with the prospective connected autonomous vehicles regulation

    Open Access•Kamil Mamak, Jadwiga Glanc•Technology in Society•2022

  • Prosthetic embodiment

    Open Access•Sean Aas•Synthese•2021

  • A Body of One's Own

    Open Access•James Thrasher•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2025

  • The Liberal Ethics of Non-Interference

    Open Access•Marco Mariotti, Roberto Veneziani•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • Social Samaritan Justice

    Open Access•Laura Valentini•American Political Science Review•2015

  • The Harm Principle - And How It Grew

    Richard A Epstein•University of Toronto Law Journal•1995

  • Are There Any Natural Rights

    H L A Hart•The Philosophical Review•1955

  • A Re-Reading of Mill on Liberty

    Open Access•J C Rees, John Rees•Political Studies•1960

  • Authority and Coercion

    Open Access•Arthur Ripstein•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2004

Unique citing works42
Citations per year2,33
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 42

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae