Beyond the Harm Principle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6325462 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur Ripstein (0000-0002-3562-5065, University of Toronto, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 215-245 |
| Publication date | 2006-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy & Public Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-3915 • E-ISSN: 1088-4963 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00066.x |
| OpenAlex | W2142097096 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 42 |
| References cited | 4 |
In On Liberty, just a few sentences after he introduces his famous "harm principle," John Stuart Mill writes "The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is answerable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his body and mind, the individual is sovereign." My aim is to argue that a commitment to individual sovereignty and a sphere of action in which you are answerable only to yourself requires that we abandon the harm principle.The only way to unseat a time honoured principle is to provide a superior alternative. Following the sentence of Mill just quoted, I will call the alternative "the sovereignty principle." Liberalism is fundamentally a doctrine about the legitimate uses of state power, and the sovereignty principle articulates the basis for those limits in terms of ideas of individuality and independence. It provides a narrow rationale for the legitimate use of state power, and precludes other proposed bases. I explain why its conception of freedom is not subject to certain familiar objections, ones that have historically driven some to embrace the harm principle. Before doing so, I show that narrowly construed, the harm principle fails to account for a significant and familiar class of wrongs that most liberals would agree merit prohibition
Action (physics · Harm · Harm principle · Law and economics · Mill · Physics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Free Will and Agency · History · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Can Contractualism Save Us from Aggregation?
Human Rights as Legal Rights
Wronging Future People
Independence for Children
Morality and Socially Constructed Norms
Respect for persons and the moral force of socially constructed norms
Is consent to psychological interventions less important than consent to bodily interventions
Kantian Perspectives on Drug Use and Drug Criminalization
An Intuitive, Abductive Argument for a Right against Mental Interference
Please wear a mask
Toward Social Justification for Pecuniary and Other Externalities
Something Is Okay
Reparative justice, historical injustice, and the nonidentity problem
Value-based accounts of normative powers and the wishful thinking objection
Imagining in Oppressive Contexts, or What’s Wrong with Blackface
Minimum pricing for alcohol
Institutional response to criminalization decisions
Labour injustice, protectionism, and transnational solidarity
Deportation, harms, and human rights
Defining harm
Property, nature, and the freedom to roam
What liberals should tolerate internationally
Is there a global harm principle
A Soft Defense of a Utilitarian Principle of Criminalization
Assessing Baselines for Identifying Harm
The Incompleteness of ‘Punishment as Fair Play’
Essential services, public education workers, and the right to strike
A Feminist Analysis of the Harm Principle
Is Fair Trade a fair deal
Deepfakes at face value
John Stuart Mill and the Contagious Diseases Acts
Evolution, Morality and the Fabric of Society
On being wronged and being wrong
Immigration enforcement and justifications for causing harm
Urban visual representation and ethical narrative risks
AI, Radical Ignorance, and the Institutional Approach to Consent
Interests, Wrongs, and the Injury Hypothesis
Problems with the prospective connected autonomous vehicles regulation
Prosthetic embodiment
A Body of One's Own
The Liberal Ethics of Non-Interference
Social Samaritan Justice
| Unique citing works | 42 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,33 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2026 (19) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 42 |