Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Body of One's Own

Samaritanism, Sex, and Self‐Ownership

Bibliographic Data

ID6325432
AuthorsJames Thrasher (0000-0001-9094-5283, Philosophy Department & Smith Institute for Philosophy and Political Economy Chapman University Orange California USA, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume53
Issue3
Pages285-295
Publication date2025-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy & Public Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0048-3915 • E-ISSN: 1088-4963
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/papa.12289
OpenAlexW4410277413
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited35

Robust Samaritan theories hold that citizens may be pressed to share whatever others need for minimal flourishing. Cécile Fabre extends that duty to organs, labor, and even sexual services, while Cohen's ideal of an “egalitarian ethos” asks citizens to internalize such claims. I show that coupling these ideas with a rejection of even minimal selfownership yields a trilemma: Bodily resources can be commandeered, everyone is motivated to comply, and rape loses its status as a wrongful taking. Efforts to cordon off sex because of concerns with trauma, autonomy, or cash compensation either become ad hoc or smuggle rights back into the body. What survives is a narrow but decisive principle of self‐ownership that forbids compelled use of another's person, while still leaving room for redistributive justice in external goods. Defending this minimal self‐ownerhsip as sovereignty does not entail libertarianism; but it preserves the practical and conceptual wrongness of rape and sustains the moral significance of sexual consent

Autonomy · Compensation (psychology · Ethos · Ideal (ethics · Law and economics · Libertarianism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Feminist Activism, Sexual Consent, and Victim Survivorship in the Postdigital Landscape

    Open Access•W Cumming-Potvin•Postdigital Science and Education•2026

  • Are markets coercive

    Open Access•Matt Zwolinski•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2026

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Anarchy, State, and Utopia•1975

  • Sour Grapes

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Sour Grapes•2016

  • The foreign policy decision-maker simulation

    Open Access•George J Nozicka, G Matthew Bonham et al.•Proceedings of the 1974 annual…•1974

  • When Equality Matters

    Open Access•James Thrasher, John Thrasher•2018

  • Rescuing Justice and Equality

    G A Cohen•Rescuing Justice and Equality•2008

  • Comment on Narveson

    Open Access•Ronald Dworkin•Social Philosophy and Policy•1983

  • When Justice Demands Inequality

    James Thrasher, John Thrasher et al.•Journal of Moral Philosophy•2015

  • Must Theorising about Adaptive Preferences Deny Women's Agency?

    Open Access•Serene J Khader•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2012

  • Occupational Choice and the Egalitarian Ethos

    Open Access•Paula Casal•Economics and Philosophy•2013

  • The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism

    Jason Brennan, Bas Van Der Vossen et al.•Routledge Handbook of Libertarianis…•2017

  • Ownership and convention

    Open Access•Shaun Nichol, Shaun Nichols et al.•Cognition•2023

  • Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality

    Open Access•G A Cohen•Self-Ownership, Freedom, and…•1995

  • A Kantian Defense of Self‐Ownership

    Open Access•Robert S Taylor•Journal of Political Philosophy•2004

  • Are There Any Natural Rights

    H L A Hart•The Philosophical Review•1955

  • The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal

    Amartya Sen•Journal of Political Economy•1970

  • A Theory of Prostitution

    Lena Edlund, Evelyn Korn•Journal of Political Economy•2002

  • Deformed Desires and Informed Desire Tests

    Open Access•Anita M Superson, Anita Superson•Hypatia•2005

  • Solving which trilemma? The many interpretations of equality, Pareto, and freedom of occupational choice

    Open Access•Kirk A Olson, Kristi A Olson•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2017

  • Personal Autonomy and the Paradox of Feminine Socialization

    Diana Tietjens Meyers, Journal Of Philosophy Inc•The Journal of Philosophy•1987

  • Beyond the Harm Principle

    Open Access•Arthur Ripstein•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2006

  • Whose body is it anyway? Justice and the integrity of the person

    Open Access•David Archard•Contemporary Political Theory•2010

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae