Resources Versus Results

This article compares the relative performance of the U.S. and the 50 state highway systems against resources available, over the period 1984–1990. Data are collected on 13 measures of revenues, expenditures, pavement condition, congestion, bridge condition, and accidents. Statistics are normalized to control the effects of size and inflation. Each state's performance is then graded according to whether the state is making progress, holding steady, or losing ground relative to the national trends. Findings show that the U.S. highway system is in good condition and is continuing to improve: even statistics on congestion are now beginning to show improvement. Against this general improvement six states have been able to maintain or improve their highway systems with considerably less resources per mile than other states. These states are New Mexico, South Dakota, Wyoming, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Arkansas. Each of these stales seems to have a combination of geography, traffic, economic structure, and fiscal capability that results in particularly cost‐effective highway systems. The findings suggest that simplistic explanations of performance based on location, urban/rural distinctions, weather, climate, or taxes are inadequate; more research is needed to explain the causes of these differences

Business · Geography · Highway system · Inflation (cosmology · Mile · Revenue · State (computer science · Transport engineering · Computer Science · Engineering · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Finance

• Identifying peer states for transportation system evaluation & policy analyses

  Open Access•Patricia Hendren, Deb Niemeier et al.•Transportation•2008

  Add to list

• State Transportation Expenditure Reporting

  Open Access•Patricia Hendren, Patricia G Hendren et al.•Public Works Management & Policy•2001

  Add to list