The Influence of Perceived Social Norms on College Students' Intention to Vote
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6335386 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carroll J Glynn (a School of Communication , Ohio State University), Michael E Huge (a School of Communication , Ohio State University), Carole A Lunney (0000-0002-0077-1281, a School of Communication , Ohio State University) |
| Año | 2009 |
| Volumen | 26 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 48-64 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2009-02-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Political Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1058-4609 • E-ISSN: 1091-7675 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10584600802622860 |
| OpenAlex | W2016098067 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 32 |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
This research investigated the impact of perceived social norms about voting on college students' intention to vote. College students were asked about their perceptions of the frequency of others' voting (descriptive norms) and the importance of voting to others (injunctive norms), as well as their own intention to vote in an upcoming election. Several weeks later, students were randomly assigned to conditions where the information about the percentage of college students who voted in the last election was manipulated. Above and beyond the influence of typical predictors of voting behavior, perceived social norms about voting were found to be a significant predictor of intention to vote. Perceived importance and frequency of voting to close friends and family were consistent predictors of intention to vote. Similarity to other students moderated the relationship between descriptive and injunctive norms of student voting and intention to vote. Giving students information about the prevalence of college student voting increased the crystallization (level of agreement) of the injunctive norm for college student voting. The present findings suggest that efforts to motivate students to vote should take advantage of the social connections among friends and families in order to maximize the effect of descriptive or injunctive normative campaigns. Keywords: political socializationvotingsocial normsdescriptive normsreturn potential model Notes 1. We thank Mark Lopez and his coauthors for pointing out this distinction. 2. We thank McDevitt and Ostrowski for suggesting this alternative
Norm (philosophy · Normative · Perception · Political science · Politics · Social norms approach · Voting · Voting behavior · Law · Media Influence and Health · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Education and the gender voting gap in U.S. presidential elections
Motivating student voter registration
Prebunking misinformation, perceptions about electoral security, and voting intentions
How, and For Whom, Does Higher Education Increase Voting
Standing Up to the Maskless
Meeting Students Where They Are
Paths to the Practices of Citizenship
Political Socialization of International Students
Political influence across generations
Exploring Social Norms as a Group-Level Phenomenon
Constructive patriotism predicts voting intentions
In Pursuit of Informed Voters
Turnout the Vote
Predicting Success
Changes in late adolescents’ voting intentions during the election campaign
Adolescents’ Patterns of Citizenship Orientations and Correlated Contextual Variables
Does the competitiveness of election moderate the impact of descriptive social norms on voter turnout? A survey experiment in Japan
More Than Politics
The Influence of Social Media Marketing on Voting Intention in Indonesia
Human Rights Attitude and Civic Engagement Behavior Among University Students
Do people vote to avoid disapproval
Understanding Change in Social‐Movement Participation
The role of norms as promoters of social change
Negative Descriptive Social Norms and Political Action
Promoting the Youth Vote
Who Cares If You Vote? Partisan Pressure and Social Norms of Voting
When Poor Students Attend Rich Schools
Do as I Say or Do as I Do? How Social Relationships Shape the Impact of Descriptive and Injunctive Norms of Voting
The Comparative Effectiveness on Turnout of Positively Versus Negatively Framed Descriptive Norms in Mobilization Campaigns
Partisan Social Pressure and Voter Mobilization
Can different policy interventions work complementarily?-A survey experiment on policy compliance
Predicting Online and Offline Civic Participation among Young Czech Roma
Reference groups
Current studies in social psychology
Social organization
How Behaviors are Influenced by Perceived Norms
Social Norms Approaches Using Descriptive Drinking Norms Education
Managing social norms for persuasive impact
The Effect of Television Viewing on Adolescents' Civic Participation
Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking
Modeling the Relationship Between Descriptive Norms and Behaviors
Moving Toward a Theory of Normative Influences
Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Social Influence
Communication Yearbook 10
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct
Causal Analysis with Panel Data
Social Norms and Identity Relevance
Group Norms and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship
Public Opinion as a Normative Opinion Process
Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
An Explication of Social Norms
Understanding the Influence of Perceived Norms on Behaviors
Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions
Kids Voting and Political Knowledge
The Primary Group as Cooley Defines It
From Top-Down to Trickle-Up Influence
Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice
A focus theory of normative conduct
The Red and Blue of Adolescence
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment
The need to belong
Social Pressure and Voter Turnout
Normative Power and Conflict Potential
| Obras citantes distintas | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,29 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 32 |