Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A cross‐cultural test of competing hypotheses about system justification using data from 42 nations

Bibliographic Data

ID6337482
AuthorsEvan A Valdes (0000-0002-8761-3285, School of Psychology Massey University – Albany Palmerston North New Zealand), James H Liu (0000-0001-9520-5727, School of Psychology Massey University – Albany Palmerston North New Zealand), Matt N Williams (0000-0002-0571-215X, School of Psychology Massey University – Albany Palmerston North New Zealand), Stuart C Carr (0000-0002-2569-0365, School of Psychology Massey University – Albany Palmerston North New Zealand)
Year2025
Volume46
Issue4
Pages822-846
Publication date2025-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/pops.13039
OpenAlexW4402840365
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited85

System justification theory (SJT) is a thriving field of research, wherein the primary questions revolve around why individuals and groups are motivated to see the systems they depend on as just, fair, and legitimate. This article seeks to answer how accurate the postulates of SJT are when compared to competing self‐interest claims of social identity and social dominance theory. We addressed the ongoing debates among proponents of each theory by identifying who, when, and why individuals decide to system‐justify. We used data comprised of 24,009 participants nested within 42 countries. Multilevel models largely supported the competing claims of social dominance and social identity theories over SJT. The most robust findings were: (1) greater objective socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with greater system justification; (2) the consistent positive relationship between subjective SES and system justification was partially mediated by life satisfaction; and (3) both ends of the political spectrum were willing to system‐justify more when the political party they favored was in power. The results presented are used to discuss both the current state and the future directions for system justification research

Biology · Economics · Political science · Positive economics · Test (biology · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Ecology

  • Whether people justify and challenge economic inequality depends on the activities of social movements

    Open Access•Judit Kende, Roberto González Gutiérrez et al.•Political Psychology•2026

  • Liberals and Conservatives See Different Victims

    Open Access•Jake Womick, Emily Kubin et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2026

  • Life satisfaction and political participation in Türkiye

    Open Access•Songül Gül Tekdal, Ceren Avcil•BMC Psychology•2026

  • Testing the multicomponent ingroup identification model in diverse stigmatized groups

    Open Access•Joelle‐Cathrin Flöther, Juliane Degner•Self and Identity•2025

  • A cross‐cultural investigation of the effects of individual privilege, group identification and societal perceptions on global consciousness

    Open Access•Sarah Y Choi, Robert Jiqi Zhang et al.•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2025

  • Cross‐cultural investigation of the relationship between social identity, trusting the system, Covid ‐19 vaccine adherence and conspiratorial beliefs

    Open Access•Evan A Valdes, Junix Jerald I Delos Santos et al.•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2025

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•1957

  • Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments

    Orlando Behling, Kenneth S Law et al.•Translating Questionnaires and…•2000

  • Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

    Open Access•Andrew Gelman, Jennifer Hill•Data Analysis Using Regression…•2006

  • Is There Any “Free” Choice?

    Open Access•Shinobu Kitayama, Alana Conner Snibbe et al.•Psychological Science•2004

  • Cross-Cultural Research Methods

    Richard W Brislin•Environment and Culture•1980

  • A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification

    Open Access•Salvador Vargas Salfate, Dario Páez et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2018

  • The generalizability crisis

    Open Access•Tal Yarkoni•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2022

  • Attitudes toward group‐based inequality

    Open Access•Michael T Schmitt, Nyla R Branscombe et al.•British Journal of Social…•2003

  • Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals?

    Open Access•Jaime L Napier, John T Jost•Psychological Science•2008

  • The Local-Ladder Effect

    Open Access•Cameron Anderson, Michael W Kraus et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • Mediation

    Open Access•Dustin Tingley, T Yamamoto et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2014

  • Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models

    Craig K Enders, Davood Tofighi•Psychological Methods•2007

  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Dale J Barr, Roger Levy et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2013

  • Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning

    Nancy E Adler, Elissa S Epel et al.•Health Psychology•2000

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • The Satisfaction With Life Scale

    Ed Diener, Robert A Emmons et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•1985

  • The authoritarian personality

    Theodor W Adorno•The authoritarian personality•1969

  • A Theory of System Justification

    Open Access•John T Jost•Theory of System Justification•2020

  • Lower class people suffered more (but perceived fewer risk disadvantages) during the Covid ‐19 pandemic

    Open Access•Yue Zhang, Yi Ding et al.•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2023

  • Testing the status‐legitimacy hypothesis

    Open Access•Evan A Valdes, James H Liu et al.•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2023

  • Testing the Status-Legitimacy Hypothesis in China

    Open Access•Wenqi Li, Ying Yang et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2020

  • Who's in power matters

    Open Access•Zsolt Péter Szabó, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist•International Journal of Psychology•2021

  • Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals

    Open Access•Felicia Pratto, Atilla Cidam et al.•Social Psychological and…•2013

  • System Justification Enhances Life Satisfaction of High- and Low-Status People in China

    Open Access•Wenqi Li, Junhui Wu et al.•Social Psychological and…•2020

  • Social Class—Not Income Inequality—Predicts Social and Institutional Trust

    Open Access•Youngju Kim, Nicolas Sommet et al.•Social Psychological and…•2022

  • Social Dominance

    Open Access•Jim Sidanius, Felicia Pratto•Social Dominance•1999

  • Rediscovering the Social Group

    Open Access•Fraser Reid•British Journal of Social…•1987

  • Attitudinal Ambivalence and the Conflict between Group and System Justification Motives in Low Status Groups

    Open Access•John T Jost, Diana Jill Burge et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies

    Open Access•John T Jost, Orsolya Hunyady•Current Directions in Psychological…•2005

  • Do lower class individuals possess higher levels of system justification? An examination from the social cognitive perspectives

    Shenlong YANG, Yongyu Guo et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2016

  • Social identity explanations of system justification

    Open Access•M Rubin, Chuma Kevin Owuamalam et al.•European Review of Social…•2023

  • Rejoinder to Rubin, Owuamalam, Spears, and Caricati (2023)

    John T Jost, Jeannine Alana Bertin et al.•European Review of Social…•2023

  • Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations

    Felicia Pratto, Jim Sidanius et al.•European Review of Social…•2006

  • Social Protest and Its Discontents

    Vivienne Badaan, John T Jost et al.•Contention•2018

  • Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

    Open Access•Mark J Brandt, Toon Kuppens et al.•European Journal of Social…•2020

  • Low system justification is associated with support for both progressive and reactionary social change

    Open Access•Luisa Liekefett, Julia Christina Becker•European Journal of Social…•2022

  • Cultural group norms for harmony explain the puzzling negative association between objective status and system justification in Asia

    Open Access•Chuma Kevin Owuamalam, Chee Meng Tan et al.•European Journal of Social…•2023

  • Finding (dis‐)advantaged system justifiers

    Open Access•Rebekka Kesberg, Mark J Brandt et al.•European Journal of Social…•2024

  • Group Dominance and the Half‐Blindness of Privilege

    Open Access•Felicia Pratto, Andrew L Stewart•Journal of Social Issues•2012

  • Social class, sense of control, and social explanation

    Michael W Kraus, Paul K Piff et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • Non-conscious forms of system justification

    Open Access•John T Jost, Brett W Pelham et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2002

  • Do humans possess an autonomous system justification motivation? A Pupillometric test of the strong system justification thesis

    Open Access•Chuma Kevin Owuamalam, Russell Spears•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019

  • Why do Americans believe in economic mobility? Economic inequality, external attributions of wealth and poverty, and the belief in economic mobility

    Open Access•Shai Davidai•Journal of Experimental Social…•2018

  • History Matters

    Open Access•James H Liu, C G Sibley et al.•Political Psychology•2014

  • When Left Is Right and Right Is Left

    Open Access•Peter Beattie, Rong Chen et al.•Political Psychology•2022

  • Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status as Sources of Status‐Legitimacy Effect and Legitimation of Income Inequality

    Open Access•Ondrej Buchel, Ruud Luijkx et al.•Political Psychology•2021

  • A Decade of System Justification Theory

    Open Access•John T Jost, Mahzarin R Banaji et al.•Political Psychology•2004

  • On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance

    Etsuko Hoshino-Browne, Etsuko Hoshino‐Browne et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2005

  • Complementary Justice

    Aaron C Kay, John T Jost•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • The meaning and role of ideology in system justification and resistance for high- and low-status people

    Jennifer L Zimmerman, Christine Reyna•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  • Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status–legitimacy hypothesis

    Mark J Brandt•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  • A quarter century of system justification theory

    Open Access•John T Jost•British Journal of Social…•2018

  • Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system

    Open Access•John T Jost, Brett W Pelham et al.•European Journal of Social…•2002

  • The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness

    Open Access•John T Jost, Mahzarin R Banaji•British Journal of Social…•1994

  • Resistance to Change

    John T Jost•Social research•2015

  • Political conservatism as motivated social cognition

    John T Jost, Jack Glaser et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • System Justification and the Meaning of Life

    Open Access•Lindsay E Rankin, John T Jost et al.•Social Justice Research•2009

  • The Development of System Justification in the Developing World

    Open Access•P J Henry, Patrick Henry et al.•Social Justice Research•2006

  • The Palliative Function of System Justification

    Open Access•Jessica F Harding, C G Sibley•Social Indicators Research•2013

Unique citing works6
Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae