All we need is love? Irreconcilable political incongruence in families after the 2019 social unrest in Hong Kong
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6337993 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Branda Yee‐man Yu (0000-0002-3025-8526, Department of Psychology The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China), Calvin Lam (0000-0002-8022-1633, Department of Psychology The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China), Christian S Chan (0000-0003-2616-5199, Department of Psychology The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 643-665 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/pops.12941 |
| OpenAlex | W4388231450 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 88 |
Political disagreement with family members can have a deleterious impact on familial relationships, but the long‐term consequences are understudied. This study examined the relational outcomes of familial political incongruence two years after the 2019 social unrest in Hong Kong and the extent to which frequency and types of family contact explain their association. This two‐wave questionnaire study augmented with a 14‐day daily record of family contact recruited (1) young adults and (2) parents with children aged 18–30 (N = 559). Nearly half of the respondents reported significant political incongruence with their parents/children. We observed consistent findings in both adult children and parents. Greater parent–child political differences were associated with reduced likelihood of having positive family communication and family functioning. Increased political differences with family members were associated with greater odds of family dysfunctionality. Moreover, expression of love and care mediated the effect of political differences with family members on changes in family functioning. This study demonstrates familial political incongruence exerts an influence on families two years after the unrest. Parent–child political differences are associated with a decline in the quality of family communication and family environment. We discuss how parent–child political incongruence drives a family to worsened well‐being through dysfunctional family dynamics
Developmental psychology · Dysfunctional family · Logistic regression · Odds · Political science · Politics · Unrest · Clinical Psychology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Medicine · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Social Psychology
Presumed orientation and performative appeasement
Family Contact Mitigates the Impact of Parent-Child Political Incongruence
Trusting dating algorithms in love and politics
Intrafamilial political discordance impacts familial and psychological well-being through reduced positive communication
Non-Apathetic Neutrality Exacerbates Dehumanization and Violence in Online Environments
Family Processes and Identity
Solidarity in the Anti-Extradition Bill movement in Hong Kong
Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems
Fathers Are Parents, Too! Widening the Lens on Parenting for Children's Development
The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology
Moral reframing
The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties
Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans
Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
How political disagreements undermine intrafamily communication
Attitude Moralization Within Polarized Contexts
From Gulf to Bridge
Rediscovering the Social Group
Returned but separated
Moral foundations and political orientation
Indigenization of Political Identity in Postcolonial Hong Kong
Partisanship as Social Identity; Implications for the Study of Party Polarization
The consumption power of the politically powerless
Do more, say less
The Frequency and Comfort of Political Conversations with Parents as Mediators of Family Communication Patterns and Relational Quality in Parent–Child Relationships
How do Chinese fathers express love? Viewing paternal warmth through the eyes of Chinese fathers, mothers, and their children
In Search of a New Political Subjectivity in Hong Kong
Predicting Success
The interplay of positive and negative intergroup contact
Dimensions of family connectedness among adolescents with mexican, chinese, and european backgrounds
How do you like them now?” Expected reactions upon discovering that a friend is a political out-group member
It could turn ugly
The Home as a Political Fortress
Americans, Not Partisans
The Politics of Mate Choice
How Emotional Frames Moralize and Polarize Political Attitudes
How the Politicization of Everyday Activities Affects the Public Sphere
The “Who” Matters
The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarization
In-Group Love Versus Out-Group Hate
Anti-Elab Movement, National Security Law, and heterogeneous institutional trust in Hong Kong
The Moral Roots of Partisan Division
Measuring moral politics
Understanding the process of moralization
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations
Data Quality and Recall Bias in Time-Diary Research
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Dynamics of Tactical Radicalisation and Public Receptiveness in Hong Kong's Anti-Extradition Bill Movement
Independence and Obedience
Explaining the impact of differences in voting patterns on resilience and relational load in romantic relationships during the transition to the Trump presidency
Political difference and polarization in the family
When protests and daily life converge
The Good Parent
Sticking Together in 'Divided Britain
Speaking against Silence
Changes in Chinese Culture as Examined Through Changes in Personal Pronoun Usage
Family Processes and Children's and Adolescents' Well-Being
A Matter of Time
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |