Why Was There a Hard Brexit? The British Legislative Party System, Divided Majorities and the Incentives for Factionalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6344010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Quinn (0000-0002-0553-7275, University of Essex, corresponding author), Nancy Allen (0000-0002-3172-3506, University of London), Nicholas Allen (0000-0002-3223-0770), John Bartle (0000-0002-5964-0243, University of Essex) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 227-248 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00323217221076353 |
| OpenAlex | W4221109639 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 32 |
The UK parliament of 2017–2019 had to decide what form of Brexit, if any, it would accept in the government’s negotiations with the EU over a withdrawal agreement. Despite a large majority of MPs having supported Remain in the 2016 referendum, with most opposed to a ‘hard’ Brexit of looser ties between the UK and the EU, all attempts to pass a ‘soft’ Brexit failed. The final withdrawal agreement reflected a hard Brexit that was closer to the preferences of a 28-strong group of Eurosceptic Conservative MPs than to those of any other party or faction in a 650-seat parliament. This article identifies the two-party system for government as a crucial variable in explaining this unexpected outcome. Governments seek majorities from among their own MPs rather than relying on the uncertain support of the opposition. This not only makes party cohesion vital, but also creates leverage for organised factions to hold sway
Brexit · Economics · European union · Government (linguistics · Incentive · International economics · Law and economics · Legislature · Market economy · Negotiation · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Referendum · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Conflict of interest
Negotiating secession
Neverland
The responses of government officials to questions from local councillors
An unpredictable pendulum
Representation of the UK Parliament’s Power in the National Media
Getting Brexit done? The politics of issue-eclipsing pledges
Administrating crisis is just a transition
Tactical Democracy
Parties and party systems
The Efficient Secret
Rational Choice and British Politics
Why Parties?
Dissension in the House of Commons
Brexit
An economic theory of democracy
Veto Players
Party System Change
The Oxford handbook of legislative studies
The Theory of Committees and Elections
Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government
Brexit means Brexit’
Where There is Discord, Can They Bring Harmony? Managing Intra-Party Dissent on European Integration in the Conservative Party
The Meaningful Votes
The Democratic Duty to Oppose Brexit
Brexit Means Brexit—or Does It? The Legacy of Theresa May's Discursive Treatment of Brexit
Whose Mandate is it Anyway? Brexit, the Constitution and the Contestation of Authority
Modes of UK Executive–Legislative Relations Revisited
Parliamentary Agenda Control and Legislative Outcomes in Western Europe
Parties, Factions and Tendencies in Britain
From Two-Partism to Alternating Predominance
Labour’s 2019 Campaign
Brexit and Parliament
Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations
Unbridled passions? Free votes, issues of conscience and the accountability of British members of parliament
The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected
Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |