Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Confusion Between Ideal and Non-Ideal in Recent Debates on Global Justice

Bibliographic Data

ID6345668
AuthorsLea Ypi (0000-0002-2573-9704, University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume58
Issue3
Pages536-555
Publication date2010-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00794.x
OpenAlexW2129376505
LanguageEN
Citations received28
References cited47

This article assesses two contending global theories of justice (cosmopolitanism and statism) in light of the role that ideal and non-ideal considerations should play in political theory. It starts with a distinction between ideal and non-ideal and it proceeds to show how both statists and cosmopolitans are ideal when non-ideal considerations should prevail and how both are non-ideal when ideal theorising is required. This view is assessed with reference to two issues on which statists and cosmopolitans appear particularly divided: the relevance of states and the principles of global justice. With regard to the former, the article shows that the discussion on states is ideal (discussing the place of special associative relations in normative justifications of distributive equality) when it should be non-ideal (emphasising the role of states as the most relevant agents of justice in real-world circumstances). On the second issue, it illustrates how the discussion on principles is non-ideal (limited to assessing the consequences of global poverty in unfavourable conditions) when it should be ideal (investigating the grounds of injustice at the appropriately fundamental level). The article concludes by sketching an alternative analysis of global justice which is able to accommodate some statist and cosmopolitan concerns but which avoids the criticisms that each theory usually attracts

Cosmopolitanism · Economic Justice · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Global justice · Ideal (ethics · Ideal theory · Injustice · Law and economics · Normative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Statism · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • A Republican Europe of States

    Open Access•R Bellamy•Republican Europe of States•2019

  • La captura de instituciones como un fenómeno internacional

    Open Access•Sara Sierra, Sara Piedrahita Sierra•Analecta política•2023

  • Good and Bad Idealizations in Political Theory

    Open Access•Luca J Uberti•Theoria•2014

  • Scientific Models and Political Theory

    Open Access•Ryan Nefdt•Theoria•2021

  • Debating global justice with Carr

    Open Access•Haro L Karkour•Journal of International…•2019

  • The value of global justice

    Open Access•Matt Sleat•Journal of International…•2016

  • Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory

    Open Access•Laura Valentini•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • A feminist argument against statism

    Angie Pepper•Journal of Global Ethics•2014

  • Normative behaviourism as a solution to four problems in realism and non-ideal theory

    Jonathan Floyd•Critical Review of International…•2018

  • Against institutional conservatism

    David V Axelsen•Critical Review of International…•2018

  • Who’s afraid of a world state? A global sovereign and the statist-cosmopolitan debate

    Shmuel Nili•Critical Review of International…•2013

  • Justice in Migration

    Open Access•Lea Ypi•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • O caminho para o consenso – análise da crítica de Waldron a Rawls sobre desacordos políticos

    Open Access•Reni Chaves Cardoso, Pâmela De Rezende Cortés et al.•Veritas (Porto Alegre)•2019

  • Sending and receiving

    Open Access•Ekaterina Balabanova, Alex Balch•European Journal of Communication•2010

  • Constitutional theory in times of crisis

    Open Access•Nenad Dimitrijević•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2016

  • Grounding the diasporic turn in political theory

    Open Access•Kai Yui Samuel Chan, Anna Closas•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Adequacy in Education and Normative School Choice

    Open Access•Adelin Dumitru, Adelin Costin Dumitru•Studies in Philosophy and Education•2018

  • Advancing Justice and Democracy ‘beyond’ the State

    Open Access•Jonathan W Kuyper•Political Studies•2015

  • Between Utopianism and Realism

    Open Access•R Bellamy•Political Studies•2019

  • Virtuous Accomplices in International Criminal Law

    Open Access•Miles Jackson•International and Comparative Law…•2019

  • Rigorist cosmopolitanism

    Open Access•Shmuel Nili•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2012

  • Can a compromise be fair

    Open Access•Peter Jones, Ian O’flynn•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2012

  • Polanyi, Hayek, and the Impossibility of Libertarian Ideal Theory

    Open Access•Peter Lindsay•Polity•2015

  • Failing International Climate Politics and the Fairness of Going First

    Open Access•Aaron Maltais•Political Studies•2014

  • The challenges of ideal theory and appeal of secular apocalyptic thought

    Open Access•Ben Jone, Ben Jones•European Journal of Political…•2020

  • Global justice and the remittances challenge

    Open Access•J Matthew Hoye•Constellations•2021

  • Making fair comparisons in political theory

    Open Access•Ingham, Sean Ingham et al.•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Practices and Principles

    Open Access•Eva Erman, Naomi Moller et al.•Philosophy Compass•2015

  • Do Rawls's Two Theories of Justice Fit Together?

    Open Access•Thomas Pogge•Rawls's Law of Peoples•2006

  • National Responsibility and Global Justice

    David Miller, David Leslie Miller•National Responsibility and…•2007

  • Political philosophy for Earthlings

    David Miller•Political theory•2008

  • Rescuing Justice and Equality

    G A Cohen•Rescuing Justice and Equality•2008

  • On Nationality

    David Miller•On Nationality (Oxford Political…•1997

  • What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?

    Amartya Sen, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2006

  • Market, State, and Community

    David Miller, David Leslie Miller•Market, State, and Community•1990

  • Rawls's Law of Peoples

    Charles R Beitz•Ethics•2000

  • A Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  • Reasons for Welfare

    Robert E Goodin•Reasons for Welfare•1988

  • Bounds of Justice

    Open Access•Onora O’neill, Onora O'Neill•Bounds of Justice•2000

  • The Problem of Global Justice

    Open Access•Thomas Nagel•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2005

  • What’s Ideal About Ideal Theory

    Zofia Stemplowska•Social Theory and Practice•2008

  • Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design

    Simon Caney•Social Theory and Practice•2006

  • Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice

    I Robeyns•Social Theory and Practice•2008

  • Global Justice and Poverty Relief in Nonideal Circumstances

    Pablo Gilabert•Social Theory and Practice•2008

  • World Poverty and Human Rights

    Thomas Pogge•Political Philosophy in the…•2018

  • On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory

    Open Access•Laura Valentini•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • Cosmopolitanism and the Law of Peoples

    Open Access•Simon Caney•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • Statist Cosmopolitanism

    Open Access•Lea Ypi, Lea L Ypi•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • World Poverty and Human Rights

    Open Access•Thomas Pogge•Ethics & International Affairs•2005

  • Should We Stop Thinking about Poverty in Terms of Helping the Poor

    Open Access•Alan Patten•Ethics & International Affairs•2005

  • Ending Tyranny in Iraq

    Open Access•Fernando R Tesón•Ethics & International Affairs•2005

  • What Do We Owe the Global Poor

    Open Access•Debra Satz•Ethics & International Affairs•2005

  • The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances

    Adam Swift•Social Theory and Practice•2008

  • Nagel's Atlas

    Open Access•A J Julius•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2006

  • Political Membership in the Contractarian Defense of Cosmopolitanism

    Open Access•Lea Ypi•The Review of Politics•2008

  • Rawlsian Global Justice

    Open Access•Andrew Kuper•Political Theory•2000

  • Transnational and International Exploitation

    Open Access•Avner De-Shalit, Avner De‐shalit•Political Studies•1998

  • Global Distributive Justice and the State

    Open Access•Simon Caney•Political Studies•2008

  • Justice in Ideal Theory

    Open Access•Colin Farrelly•Political Studies•2007

  • Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion

    Open Access•Arash Abizadeh•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2007

  • Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy

    Open Access•Michael Blake•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2001

  • Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State

    Open Access•Andrea Sangiovanni•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2007

  • Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia

    Open Access•Joshua Cohen, Charles F Sabel et al.•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2006

  • Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2007

  • How Does the Global Order Harm the Poor

    Open Access•Marielle Risse, Mathias Risse•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2005

  • An Egalitarian Law of Peoples

    Open Access•Thomas Pogge, Thomas W Pogge•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1994

  • Just Constraints

    Open Access•Andrew Mason•British Journal of Political…•2004

Unique citing works28
Citations per year1,56
Citation span2008 - 2025 (18)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 28

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae