The Place of Negative Morality in Political Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6350596 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Allen (0009-0004-4203-7167, Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 337-363 |
| Publication date | 2001-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-5917 • E-ISSN: 1552-7476 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0090591701029003002 |
| OpenAlex | W2114554412 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 28 |
Are normative political theorists beautiful souls, who escape to rarefied atmosphere of a of moral ideals from of evils, injustice, cruelty, and suffering we regrettably inhabit? Moral philosophers and political theorists are nowadays often confronted with accusations of abstraction and formalism from an ever-growing anti-Kantian faction. But related charge of idealism, once leveled almost as a reflex against normative political theory by realists and Marxist social theorists, is now less frequently encountered in academic circles. Nevertheless, it remains part of popular perception of field by nonacademics, and social scientists often harbor suspicions of this sort concerning strange, unworldly activities of political theorists. Moreover, such suspicions are especially pronounced in political situations in which conflicts seem intractable or very violent.2 Is accusation that normative bent of moral philosophy and political theory renders them unable to come to terms with the real world of cruelty and suffering a valid and interesting criticism? In some of its cruder forms, it clearly is not. If it is intended to imply that concern of philosophers and political theorists with positive moral ideals renders them, like George Bernard Shaw's character, Androcles, simply oblivious to evil surrounding them, then this is obviously false and misleading. A concern with justice or
Criminology · Criticism · Cruelty · Epistemology · Idealism · Immorality · Injustice · Morality · Normative · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Power and Powerlessness
Enduring Injustice
History and reality
Skepsis und Sozialdemokratie – Mésalliance oder Zukunftsbündnis
Die gerechtigkeitsproduktive Funktion politischer Konflikte. Judith Shklars konfliktiver Liberalismus
Furcht und Elend in der Demokratie. Zur Aktualität des politischen Denkens von Judith N. Shklar
Les peurs du libéralisme
Das Paternalismusproblem und die Frage nach dem guten Leben
Ugly Attachments
Thoughts on War
We Are Human, Too”
Taken lives matter
El liberalismo de Friedrich A. Hayek y Judith N. Shklar
Hope and Memory in the Thought of Judith Shklar
Dostoyevsky and the Defense of Compassion
Resisting dehumanization—exploring nonideal human rights education
Judith Shklar on the problem of political motivation
Legitimacy, resistance and the stakes of politics
Painted scenes’ or ‘empty pageants’? Superficiality and depth in (realist) political thought
Justice as Non-maleficence
Who Needs a Theory of Justice? Judith Shklar and the Politics of Injustice
Each for All and All for Each
Complacent and Conservative? Redeeming the Liberalism of Fear
Cruelty, Injustice, and the Liberalism of Fear
What is the Point of a Public Morality
Historical memory, democratic citizenship, and political theory
The knowledge of suffering
Reconciliation as Ideology and Politics
| Unique citing works | 28 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,4 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 28 |