Theorizing Women's Representation in the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID6354402
AuthorsSuzanne Dovi (0000-0002-0637-6805, University of Arizona, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume3
Issue3
Pages297-319
Publication date2007-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics & Gender (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1743-923X • E-ISSN: 1743-9248
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1743923x07000281
OpenAlexW2104080948
LanguageEN
Citations received37
References cited63

From the perspective of women's experiences, it is easy to see that democratic representative institutions can be tools of oppression. After all, formal democratic institutions have been either a form of governance that has only ruled over women (e.g., women were formally prohibited from holding elected offices) or a form of governance in which women have ruled and been ruled unequally (e.g., the number of female representatives have been significantly lower than the number of male representatives). Moreover, informal representative institutions, for example, interest groups, do not seem to work for women as well as they do for powerful men (Strolovitch 2007). These facts suggest that democratic representative institutions need to be viewed suspiciously. We should not assume that representative institutions in democracies necessarily benefit all women. We need to recognize how they can divide women, pitting some women's interests and preferences against other women's interests and preferences. Democratic representative institutions can function to preserve the status quo, distributing benefits unjustly among different men and women

Corporate governance · Democracy · Democratic governance · Economics · Oppression · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Representation (politics · Sociology · Status quo · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Law

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub