Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Influencing Elite Opinion on Gender Equality through Framing

A Survey Experiment of Elite Support for Corporate Board Gender Quotas

Bibliographic Data

ID6355019
AuthorsMari Teigen (0000-0003-4414-9803, Institute for Social Research), Rune Karlsen (0000-0002-4509-1896, University of Oslo)
Year2020
Volume16
Issue3
Pages792-815
Publication date2020-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics & Gender (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1743-923X • E-ISSN: 1743-9248
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1743923x19000060
OpenAlexW2951540251
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited44

This article contributes to both the scholarly debates on the controversies over gender quotas and the body of knowledge on framing effects through an investigation of whether national elites, individuals in top positions across 10 sectors of Norwegian society, are susceptible to positive framing of corporate board gender quotas (CBQs). Elites are thought to be more resistant to framing, and their predispositions are found to be stronger and more consistent than those of the general public. However, few, if any, studies have empirically investigated framing effects on national elites. We report on an experiment embedded in a comprehensive survey of Norwegian national elites. The results clearly indicate that elites are susceptible to framing. When exposed to frames highlighting both male dominance among the business elite and the success of CBQs in achieving gender balance on corporate boards, elites were significantly more likely to support gender quotas. Framing effects were primarily found among men, not women, and contrary to expectation, effects were stronger among the business elite. Thus, we should direct our attention to how the framing of issues also influences key stakeholders, and policy makers should consider opposition to gender equality measures as something that has the propensity to change

Demographic economics · Economics · Elite · Framing (construction · Geography · Norwegian · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Corporate Finance and Governance · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Framing and feedback

    Open Access•Mari Teigen, Hege Skjeie et al.•European Journal of Politics and…•2019

  • Gender attitudes in agriculture and positivity bias

    Open Access•Catherine Ragasa, Isabel B Lambrecht et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2026

  • The Growth of a Field

    Open Access•Mona Lena Krook•Politics & Gender•2025

  • How perceptions and information about women’s descriptive representation affect support for positive action measures

    Open Access•H Coffe, Marion Reiser•International Political Science…•2023

  • Quotas or parity? How the framing of positive action measures impacts public support and backlash

    Open Access•H Coffe, Sparsha Saha et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • Attitudes to gender quotas

    Open Access•Ragnhild Louise Muriaas, Yvette Peters•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Experiments and Surveys on Political Elites

    Open Access•Joshua D Kertzer, Jonathan Renshon•Annual Review of Political Science•2022

  • Uniform for All? A Framing Experiment on the Acceptance of a Gender‐Neutral Compulsory Service in Switzerland

    Open Access•Johanna Hornung, Basil Vifian et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2025

  • Elites on Equality

    Open Access•Mari Teigen, Arnfinn H Midtbøen et al.•Acta Sociologica•2023

  • The Sage Handbook of Political Communication

    Holli A Semetko, Holli Semetko et al.•SAGE Handbook of Political…•2012

  • Democratic State and Democratic Society

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Gunnar C Aakvaag et al.•Democratic State and Democratic…•2018

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Legislating a Woman’s Seat on the Board

    Open Access•Siri Terjesen, R V Aguilera et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2015

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Science•1981

  • The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication

    Kate Kenski, Kathleen Hall Jamieson•The Oxford Handbook of Political…•2017

  • Is Anyone Responsible?

    Shanto Iyengar•Is Anyone Responsible?•1991

  • Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas

    Bernard Enjolras, Karl Henrik Sivesind et al.•Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas•2012

  • A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments

    Open Access•Dennis Chong, James N Druckman•Journal of Communication•2007

  • The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics

    Philip E Converse•Politisk Psykologi•2010

  • Quotas for Women in Politics

    Mona Lena Krook•Quotas for women in politics•2009

  • The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality

    C Bacchi, Emanuela Lombardo et al.•Discursive Politics of Gender…•2009

  • The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior

    Russell J Dalton, Hans‐dieter Klingemann et al.•The Oxford Handbook of Political…•2007

  • Gender Quotas – Controversial But Trendy

    Drude Dahlerup•International Feminist Journal of…•2008

  • Quotas as a ‘fast track’ to equal representation for women

    Drude Dahlerup, Lenita Freidenvall•International Feminist Journal of…•2005

  • The Politics of the Service Class

    Open Access•Magne P Flemmen, Magne Flemmen•European Societies•2013

  • Displacement and Empowerment

    M Verloo•Social Politics International…•2005

  • Gender, Management and Market Discourse

    Open Access•Janne Tienari, Charlotte Holgersson et al.•Gender Work and Organization•2009

  • The affirmative action controversy

    Mari Teigen•NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist…•2000

  • The Realization of Gender Quotas in Post-collapse Iceland

    Laufey Axelsdóttir, Þorgerður Einarsdóttir et al.•NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist…•2017

  • Getting Real

    Open Access•Sophie Lecheler, Claes H De Vreese•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Corporate Quotas and Symbolic Politics in Advanced Democracies

    Jennifer M Piscopo, Susan Clark Muntean•Women & Politics•2018

  • Counterframing Effects

    Dennis Chong, James N Druckman•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment

    Open Access•Rune Slothuus•Scandinavian Political Studies•2007

  • Women on Corporate Boards

    Open Access•Andrea Chandler•Politics & Gender•2016

  • What Draws Politicians’ Attention? An Experimental Study of Issue Framing and its Effect on Individual Political Elites

    Open Access•Stefaan Walgrave, Julie Sevenans et al.•Political Behavior•2018

  • All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy

    Open Access•Anthony Clayton, Amanda Clayton et al.•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • What Makes People Worry about the Welfare State? A Three-Country Experiment

    Open Access•Achim Goerres, Rune Karlsen et al.•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • Framing Theory

    D Chong, James N Druckman•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • Framing

    Open Access•Robert M Entman•Journal of Communication•1993

  • Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance

    Open Access•Thomas E Nelson, Rosalee A Clawson et al.•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation

    Open Access•Lisa Disch•American Political Science Review•2011

  • Quotas for Men

    Open Access•Rainbow Murray•American Political Science Review•2014

  • Gender Quotas for Legislatures and Corporate Boards

    Melanie M Hughes, P Paxton et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2017

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,29
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae