War Duration and the Micro-Dynamics of Decision Making under Stress
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6355756 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elizabeth A Stanley (0000-0002-8500-7943, Georgetown University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 178-200 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Polity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3497 • E-ISSN: 1744-1684 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/696359 |
| OpenAlex | W2791440653 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 46 |
Previous empirical research has demonstrated that war has negative duration dependence: the longer a war has already lasted, the harder it is to end. Many arguments have been advanced to explain this, including bargaining or commitment problems, domestic politics, entrapment dynamics, sunk costs, and cognitive and emotional biases. Drawing on recent empirical and experimental research in neuroscience, psychology, and stress physiology, this article will examine the micro-dynamics of human decision making in high-stress situations (such as prosecuting and negotiating to end a war) in order to connect these many approaches. In high-stress environments, cognitive functioning usually depletes over time, decreasing top-down regulation of emotions and stress arousal, and thereby increasing subcortical influence on decision making. Depleted cognitive functioning also decreases tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity, two states endemic to the war termination process, which further exacerbates subcortical influence on decisions. As a result, actors' ability to absorb and accurately assess information and to make effective decisions may be undermined. This article also connects these micro-dynamics of decision making under stress to some of the arguments previously advanced to explain war's negative duration dependence
Ambiguity · Arousal · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Duration (music · Dynamics (music · Economics · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Stress (linguistics · Computer Science · Law · Neuroscience · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology
The impact of rational and experiential thinking styles on resource allocation in human - Computer fighting games
How Stress, Trauma, and Emotion May Shape Post-Conflict Environments – with Implications for International Peacekeeping
The micro-dynamics of peace and conflict
Conclusion to the Symposium on War Duration
Decisions
Introduction
Rationality and the Limits of Psychology in Explaining Interstate War Duration
Unifying the Study of the Causes and Duration of Wars
Moving Beyond Pathology
Stressed Out
The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology
War and Punishment
How Wars End
Perceiving Your Group’s Future to Be in Jeopardy
The human emotional brain without sleep — a prefrontal amygdala disconnect
In two minds
The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Hope in the Middle East
Threat Perception in International Relations
Peace at What Price
Handbook of Social Cognition
The Neurobiological Toll of Child Abuse and Neglect
Uncertainty and War Duration
Go Big or Go Home? Positive Emotions and Responses to Wartime Success
Committing to Peace
Testing Novel Implications from the Selectorate Theory of War
Challenges to the Study of Long Wars
Rationality and the Limits of Psychology in Explaining Interstate War Duration
Unifying the Study of the Causes and Duration of Wars
Moving Beyond Pathology
Physiological Arousal and Political Beliefs
Emotions and Emotion Regulation in Intractable Conflict
Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice
The Feeling of Rationality
Overcoming Psychological Barriers to Peaceful Conflict Resolution
Rivalry and Diversionary Uses of Force
The Effect of Sociopsychological Barriers on the Processing of New Information about Peace Opportunities
Personal Functioning Under Stress
Learning from the Battlefield
Learning and foreign policy
Affective Politics after 9/11
Beat them or ban them
Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk tasking, and self-regulation
The group polarization phenomenon
Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |