Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Federal Information Resources Management after the Paperwork Reduction Act

Bibliographic Data

ID6359654
AuthorsSharon L Caudle (corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume48
Issue4
Pages790-790
Publication date1988-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/975603
OpenAlexW2025268480
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited2

In 1985, Harlan Cleveland wrote in the Public Administration Review that information is the dominant resource in the United States and perhaps the world.I Cleveland's observation underscores the importance of effectively managing information and related resources such as computers and information systems. Numerous books and articles on their management now populate library and bookstore shelves, generally catalogued under the rubric of information resources management (IRM). IRM, operating in a world of integrated networks where information has strategic importance, reflects major changes in information management during the last three decades.2 Not surprisingly, the federal government has been swept up in the IRM tide. The subject of task force deliberations, explicit legislation, and implementing regulations, information resources have joined money, personnel, and other resources in the net of strong management control. Reporting on the findings of a 1987 study, this article examines IRM in federal executive departments and bureaus following passage of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, the Act that formally introduced and mandated information resources management in the federal government. Among other questions, the study explores (1) how IRM is organized at departmental and bureau levels, including whether IRM is organized differently from other resource management functions; (2) what are the roles and relationships between departmental and bureau IRM units; and (3) what major management changes have resulted from the Paperwork Reduction Act. This research shows that IRM in practice has not penetrated far across departments or down into bureau management as the 1980 legislation intended. Information technology management dominates IRM activities, leaving information management as almost an afterthought

Business · Political science · Process management · Reduction (mathematics · Banking Systems and Strategies · Intellectual Property Rights and Media · Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs · Public Administration

  • The powers of problem definition

    Open Access•Janet A Weiss•Policy Sciences•1989

  • Federal information resources management

    Open Access•Joe Ryan, Charles R McClure et al.•Government Information Quarterly•1994

  • Issues in Public Management Information Systems

    Open Access•John W Swain, Jay D White et al.•The American Review of Public…•1995

  • Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations

    Stuart Bretschneider•Public Administration Review•1990

  • Information Policy

    Open Access•E Sam Overman, Anthony G Cahill et al.•Review of Policy Research•1990

  • Managing the Freedom of Information Act and Federal Information Policy

    Lotte E Feinberg•Public Administration Review•1986

  • Access to Government Information in the Information Age

    Harold C Relyea•Public Administration Review•1986

Citations per year0.14
Citation span1989 - 1995 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae