Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Leveraging Auxiliary Data, Differential Incentives, and Survey Mode to Target Hard-to-Reach Groups in an Address-Based Sample Design

Bibliographic Data

ID6367131
AuthorsMichael W Link, Michael Link (Nielsen (United States), corresponding author), Anh Thu Burks
Year2013
Volume77
Issue3
Pages696-713
Publication date2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nft018
OpenAlexW1974204070
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited23

Journal Article Leveraging Auxiliary Data, Differential Incentives, and Survey Mode to Target Hard-to-Reach Groups in an Address-Based Sample Design Get access Michael W. Link, Michael W. Link * Michael W. Link is chief methodologist and senior vice president for the Measurement Science Institute at Nielsen, Marietta, GA, USA. Anh Thu Burks is a research director at Nielsen, Tampa, FL, USA. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Nielsen. *Address correspondence to Michael W. Link, The Nielsen Company, 3784 Ardsley Ct., Marietta, GA 30062, USA; e-mail: [email protected]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Anh Thu Burks Anh Thu Burks Michael W. Link is chief methodologist and senior vice president for the Measurement Science Institute at Nielsen, Marietta, GA, USA. Anh Thu Burks is a research director at Nielsen, Tampa, FL, USA. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Nielsen. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 77, Issue 3, Fall 2013, Pages 696–713, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft018 Published: 29 May 2013

Economics · Incentive · Library science · Management · Sample (material · Sociology · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

  • An Inductive Approach to Examining Racial Majority Versus Minority Expectations and Appraisals of Police Legitimacy in a Small-Town Context

    Open Access•Tyrell Spencer, Tammy Rinehart Kochel•Race and Justice•2021

  • Face-to-Face Surveys in High Crime Areas

    Joseph John Pashea, Tammy Rinehart Kochel•Journal of Criminal Justice…•2015

  • Recruiting and retaining youth and young adults

    Jennifer Cantrell, Elizabeth C Hair et al.•Tobacco Control•2017

  • Monetary Incentives in Large-Scale Face-to-Face Surveys

    Open Access•Michael Blohm, Achim Koch•International Journal of Public…•2021

  • Can Marketing Data Aid Survey Research? Examining Accuracy and Completeness in Consumer-File Data

    Josh Pasek, M Jones-Jang et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • The Additional Effects of Adaptive Survey Design Beyond Post-Survey Adjustment

    Open Access•Shiyu Zhang, James Wagner•Sociological Methods & Research•2024

  • Using Monetary Incentives With Hard-to-Reach Populations in Panel Surveys

    Valerie Martinez-Ebers•International Journal of Public…•1997

  • Stubbing Our Toes for a Foot in the Door? Prior Contact, Incentives and Survey Response

    John Brehm, John M Brehm•International Journal of Public…•1994

  • Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation

    M W Link, Michael Link et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • Cell-Phone-Only Voters in the 2008 Exit Poll and Implications for Future Noncoverage Bias

    Michael Mokrzycki, Scott Keeter et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • Cell-Phone-Only Households and Problems of Differential Nonresponse Using an Address-Based Sampling Design

    M W Link, Michael Link et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Using Community-Level Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Survey

    Timothy P Johnson, Y I Cho et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  • Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates

    Allan H Church•Public Opinion Quarterly•1993

  • Mail Survey Response Rate

    Richard J Fox, Melvin R Crask et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1988

  • The Influence of Incremental Increases in Token Cash Incentives on Mail Survey Response

    N Trussell•Public Opinion Quarterly•2004

  • Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys

    Robert M Groves•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  • Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century

    Richard T Curtin, R Curtin et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  • Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation

    Robert M Groves, Eleanor Singer et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2000

  • A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random-Digit Dialing (RDD) for General Population Surveys

    M W Link, Michael Link et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • What's Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys

    Scott Keeter, Keeter et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • The Changing Role of Address-Based Sampling in Survey Research

    Vincent G Iannacchione, G Iannacchione•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • An Evaluation of Respondent Selection Methods for Household Mail Surveys

    M P Battaglia, Maurizio Battaglia et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2014 - 2024 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae