Women Experts and Gender Bias in Political Media
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6367160 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam Ozer (0000-0002-5442-5448, Research Associate, Department of Political Science, Machine-Assisted Human Decision-Making (MAHD) Lab, University of Houston , Houston, TX, US ; and Professional Affiliate, Department of Government, Electoral Psychology Observatory, London School of Economics, London, UK) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 293-315 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/poq/nfad011 |
| PMID | 37559747 |
| OpenAlex | W4376128616 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 47 |
Widely held gender stereotypes present obstacles for women experts, who are generally evaluated less positively than equally qualified men across a range of fields. While audiences may view women as better equipped to handle certain feminine-stereotyped issues, Role Congruency Theory suggests that expert authority in politics may be incongruent with traditional feminine gender roles, leading to a subsequent backlash. Building upon the latter theory, I hypothesize that when cued to consider the expertise of a news source, the (in)congruence of gender-stereotyped roles will activate gender biases which increase the gap in evaluations and trust of women and men. Using selection experiments, I assess the relationship between domain-relevant expertise and gender biases across a range of gender-stereotyped issues. I find that women experts are rewarded less for additional expertise and punished more severely for a lack of expertise, exacerbating gender-based biases relative to the control. I find that this pattern is consistent across both masculine- and feminine-stereotyped issues, including issues that disproportionately impact women, such as women’s health care and the gender wage gap. The addition of competing partisan cues, however, overwhelms the influence of gender. The normative implications suggest women in the media often face an uphill battle to advocate for their interests on key issues that affect them even when they may have more direct relevant experience in addition to their qualifications
Affect (linguistics · Backlash · Face (sociological concept · Normative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Applying machine learning to gauge the number of women in science, technology, and innovation policy (STIP)
Consistent effects of science and scientist characteristics on public trust across political regimes
The Effects of Bias Mitigation Prompts and Gender Education on Student Evaluations of Teaching
The Gender Gap in Peace and Conflict Journals, 2000–2024
Do Politicians’ Genders Influence Voter Persuasion
Gendered Patterns of Parliamentary Attention
Culture et algorithmes
Expert Political Judgment
Communicating science in politicized environments
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
The Reasoning Voter
Media Frames and Cognitive Accessibility
Counteracting the Politicization of Science
Red Media, Blue Media
Niche News
Church or state? Reassessing how religion shapes impressions of candidate positions
Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents
I Didn’t Lie, I Misspoke”
Assessing Selective Exposure in Experiments
Putting gender on the table”
Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states
An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy
Are Experts (News)Worthy? Balance, Conflict, and Mass Media Coverage of Expert Consensus
Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk
Gender Attitudes, Gendered Partisanship
Gender, Sex, and the Role of Stereotypes in Evaluations of Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Presidential Candidates
Wanting What Is Fair
The Blind Leading the Blind
On the Limits of Framing Effects
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Voting for Women Candidates by Level and Type of Office
A Feminine Advantage? Delineating the Effects of Feminine Trait and Feminine Issue Messages on Evaluations of Female Candidates
Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates
Support for Leader's Decisions in Conflict and Negotiation
Gresham's Law of Political Communication
Do Female Politicians Face Stronger Backlash for Corruption Allegations? Evidence from Survey-Experiments in Brazil and Mexico
Gender Stereotypes, Information Search, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns
But Can She Make America Great Again? Threat, Stability, and Support for Female Candidates in the United States
The Messenger Overwhelming the Message
The Political Environment and Citizen Competence
When Common Identities Decrease Trust
Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates
Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives
Character Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluation
Party Over Policy
A Delicate Hand or Two-Fisted Aggression? How Gendered Language Influences Candidate Perceptions
Managing Ambivalent Prejudices
The Mark of a Woman's Record
The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process
Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate
Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |