Order Effects in Complex and Simple Tasks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6370477 |
|---|---|
| Authors | N Malhotra (0000-0003-4477-6049) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 180-198 |
| Publication date | 2009-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/poq/nfp008 |
| OpenAlex | W2159094318 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 21 |
There is strong evidence that the order in which response options are presented in surveys significantly affects the answers that respondents provide. According to the theory of survey satisficing, the severity of order effects should increase with task difficulty. However, the tasks provided to respondents in existing studies of response-order effects are generally very simple, making it difficult to evaluate the satis- ficing hypothesis. Further, evidence from cognitive psychology suggests a completely different mechanism: people are more motivated to persist in completing tasks when they are intricate, challenging, and enriching. I designed survey experiments administered over the Internet consisting of two types of tasks: (1) a complex task in which respondents were asked to rank seven public officials in order of how much they should be blamed for the property damage and loss of life caused by Hurricane Katrina in the city of New Orleans; and (2) a series of simple tasks in which respon- dents answered items with ordinal response choices on rating scales. I found almost no order effects in the complex task among all educational groups. Conversely, I found significant and substantial order effects in the simple tasks, particularly among low-education respondents. These results suggest that theories of survey satisficing may simplify matters by assuming that satisficing monotonically increases with task difficulty. Moreover, my findings have important implications for questionnaire design, underscoring the importance of randomizing response options
Cognitive psychology · Economics · Epistemology · Order (exchange · Simple (philosophy · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques · Philosophy
Abrupt peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use after changing the question order in a repeated self-administered survey
First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in Vignette-Based Measurement
Taking stock of global land indicators
Option-Splitting Effects in Poll Regarding Japan’s Right to Exercise Collective Self-Defense
Measurements of cognitive skill by survey mode
The impact of response options ordering on respondents’ answers to rating questions
Addressing Measurement Errors in Ranking Questions for the Social Sciences
Representing Preferences through Multi-Option Referendums
Asking about Complex Policies
Questions for Surveys
Assessing the potential demand for electric cars
Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods
Response-Order Effects in Likert-Type Scales
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
Satisficing in surveys
Logit Models for Sets of Ranked Items
An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement
Education Moderates Some Response Effects in Attitude Measurement
Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally
The Measurement of Values in Surveys
Why an Order Effect
Survey Research
Effects of Category Order on Answers in Mail and Telephone Surveys1
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |