Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Order Effects in Complex and Simple Tasks

Bibliographic Data

ID6370477
AuthorsN Malhotra (0000-0003-4477-6049)
Year2009
Volume73
Issue1
Pages180-198
Publication date2009-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfp008
OpenAlexW2159094318
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited21

There is strong evidence that the order in which response options are presented in surveys significantly affects the answers that respondents provide. According to the theory of survey satisficing, the severity of order effects should increase with task difficulty. However, the tasks provided to respondents in existing studies of response-order effects are generally very simple, making it difficult to evaluate the satis- ficing hypothesis. Further, evidence from cognitive psychology suggests a completely different mechanism: people are more motivated to persist in completing tasks when they are intricate, challenging, and enriching. I designed survey experiments administered over the Internet consisting of two types of tasks: (1) a complex task in which respondents were asked to rank seven public officials in order of how much they should be blamed for the property damage and loss of life caused by Hurricane Katrina in the city of New Orleans; and (2) a series of simple tasks in which respon- dents answered items with ordinal response choices on rating scales. I found almost no order effects in the complex task among all educational groups. Conversely, I found significant and substantial order effects in the simple tasks, particularly among low-education respondents. These results suggest that theories of survey satisficing may simplify matters by assuming that satisficing monotonically increases with task difficulty. Moreover, my findings have important implications for questionnaire design, underscoring the importance of randomizing response options

Cognitive psychology · Economics · Epistemology · Order (exchange · Simple (philosophy · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques · Philosophy

  • Abrupt peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use after changing the question order in a repeated self-administered survey

    Open Access•César Pérez-Romero, Gregorio Barrio et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in Vignette-Based Measurement

    Open Access•Katrin Auspurg, Annette Jäckle•Sociological Methods & Research•2017

  • Taking stock of global land indicators

    Open Access•Heather Huntington, Caleb Stevens•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Option-Splitting Effects in Poll Regarding Japan’s Right to Exercise Collective Self-Defense

    Ayumi Yamada, Ji Young Kim•Social Science Japan Journal•2016

  • Measurements of cognitive skill by survey mode

    Open Access•Anthony Gooch•Research & Politics•2015

  • The impact of response options ordering on respondents’ answers to rating questions

    Evgeniy Terentev, Natalia Maloshonok•International Journal of Social…•2018

  • Addressing Measurement Errors in Ranking Questions for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Yuki Atsusaka, Seo-Young Silvia Kim•Political Analysis•2025

  • Representing Preferences through Multi-Option Referendums

    Charlotte C L Wagenaar, T W G Tom Van Der Meer et al.•Representation•2025

  • Asking about Complex Policies

    Open Access•Steve Jessee, N Malhotra et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024

  • Questions for Surveys

    Nora Cate Schaeffer, Jennifer Dykema•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Assessing the potential demand for electric cars

    Open Access•S Beggs, Steven D Beggs et al.•Journal of Econometrics•1981

  • Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods

    Open Access•J R DeShazo, German Fermo•Journal of Environmental…•2002

  • Response-Order Effects in Likert-Type Scales

    Open Access•Jason C K Chan, Jason C Chan•Educational and Psychological…•1991

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Applied Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • Satisficing in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick, Sowmya Narayan et al.•New Directions for Evaluation•1996

  • Logit Models for Sets of Ranked Items

    P D Allison, Nicholas A Christakis•Sociological Methodology•1994

  • An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement

    Jon A Krosnick, Duane F Alwin•Public Opinion Quarterly•1987

  • Education Moderates Some Response Effects in Attitude Measurement

    Sowmya Narayan, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•1996

  • Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally

    Allyson L Holbrook, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • The Measurement of Values in Surveys

    Duane F Alwin, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•1985

  • Why an Order Effect

    Sam L Becker•Public Opinion Quarterly•1954

  • Survey Research

    Jon A Krosnick•Annual Review of Psychology•1999

  • Effects of Category Order on Answers in Mail and Telephone Surveys1

    Open Access•Don A Dillman, Tommy L Brown et al.•Rural Sociology•1995

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2011 - 2025 (15)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae