Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing the Scientific Knowledge of the General Public

The Effects of Question Format and Encouraging or Discouraging Don’t Know Responses

Bibliographic Data

ID6372126
AuthorsRoger Tourangeau, Aaron Maitland, H Yanna Yan
Year2016
Volume80
Issue3
Pages741-760
Publication date2016-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfw009
OpenAlexW2400438382
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited16

There is considerable controversy in the literature about how to measure the knowledge of the general public. Much of the past work concerns political knowledge and has focused on two issues—whether don’t know (DK) responses should be encouraged or discouraged and whether the items should take a multiple-choice or open-ended format. Similar questions have been raised about the best way to measure the public’s knowledge of basic science facts, which the National Science Board (NSB) has monitored for more than forty years. The NSB battery consists of eleven items, ten of them true-false items. The introduction to the items encourages DK responses. We carried out an experiment that compared true-false and forced-choice versions of the items; the experiment also compared versions of the questions that discouraged DK responses (thereby increasing guessing), encouraged them (decreasing guessing), or simply omitted a DK option. With a few items, the forced-choice format was harder than the true-false (i.e., fewer respondents answered them correctly), but with others that format was easier, with no overall pattern. Similarly, the reliability, unidimensionality, and validity of scale scores did not differ by question format. By contrast, encouraging DKs improved the reliability, unidimensionality, and validity of the battery relative to the other two DK conditions. We present a model that shows that discouraging DKs (thereby encouraging guesses) improves the measurement of knowledge only when it increases educated guesses more than it increases blind guesses. That apparently is not true for the science knowledge items we examine

Cognitive psychology · Power (physics · Reliability (semiconductor · Scale (ratio · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Social Psychology

  • Learning to support science

    Open Access•Kevin M Roessger, Arie Todd Greenleaf•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Dismissing “Don’t Know” Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research

    Open Access•E A Waters, Marc T Kiviniemi et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2022

  • Race, Criminal Records, and Discrimination Against Job Seekers

    Open Access•Megan Denver, Justin T Pickett•Social Currents•2021

  • The Language of Stigmatization and the Mark of Violence

    Open Access•Megan Denver, Justin T Pickett et al.•Criminology•2017

  • Separating Science Knowledge from Religious Belief

    Aaron Maitland, Roger Tourangeau et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • The Effects of Metacognition in Survey Research

    Open Access•Matthew D Sweitzer, Hillary C Shulman•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • Mechanical Turk and the “Don’t Know” Option

    Open Access•Adam R Brown, John Collins Pope•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha

    Open Access•Klaas Sijtsma•Psychometrika•2009

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Applied Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • The measurement of civic scientific literacy

    Open Access•Jon D Miller•Public Understanding of Science•1998

  • Who Knows? Question Format and Political Knowledge

    J Robison•International Journal of Public…•2014

  • Don’t Know” Means “Don’t Know

    Robert C Luskin, John G Bullock•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • The Impact of “No Opinion” Response Options on Data Quality

    Jon A Krosnick, Allyson L Holbrook et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2001

  • The Knowledge Gap

    Jeffery J Mondak, Mary R Anderson•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Experimenting with a "Third Way" in Political Knowledge Estimation

    Melissa K Miller, K Orr et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys

    Fricker, Scott Fricker•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  • An Experiment on the Measurement of Political Knowledge in Surveys

    Patrick Sturgis, Nick Allum et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Should We Take Don't Know for an Answer

    Mikael Gilljam, Donald Granberg•Public Opinion Quarterly•1993

  • Asked and Answered

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak, Belinda Creel Davis•Political Behavior•2001

  • Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Analysis•1999

  • Developing Valid Knowledge Scales

    Jeffrey J Mondak•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Survey Research

    Jon A Krosnick•Annual Review of Psychology•1999

Citations per year0.78
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae