Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mea Culpa? The Role of Data Collection in Public Officials Acknowledging Policy Failure

Bibliographic Data

ID6383754
AuthorsSarah James (0000-0002-3352-9336, Harvard University Press, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume22
Issue1
Pages96-119
Publication date2022-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueState Politics & Policy Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-4400 • E-ISSN: 1946-1607
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/spq.2021.11
OpenAlexW3149638953
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited29

State governments, often described as “laboratories of democracy,” design and implement many public policies, but this moniker also implies course correction when initial efforts fail. But how do states learn from failure? Existing hypotheses about policy learning and broad research capacity are insufficient. I argue that a state’s bureaucratic capacity to gather data—distinct from its analytical capacity—is necessary for public officials to acknowledge failure, highlighting the impact of policy and institutional design on evidence-based policy making and policy corrections

Bureaucracy · Democracy · Economic Justice · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Public relations · State (computer science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Institutional Capacities, Partisan Divisions, and Federal Tensions in U.S. Responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Sarah James, Caroline Tervo et al.•RSF The Russell Sage Foundation…•2022

  • Researchers in the Laboratories of Democracy

    Open Access•Abigail A Matthews, Frederick J Boehmke•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2026

  • We’ll stop having debates

    Open Access•Sarah James•Party Politics•2025

  • Mea Culpa? The Role of Data Collection in Public Officials Acknowledging Policy Failure

    Open Access•Sarah James•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2022

  • Advocacy groups, policy subsidies, and policy change

    Open Access•Leslie K Finger•Policy Studies Journal•2024

  • The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy

    Daniel Carpenter, Daniel P Carpenter•Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy•2002

  • The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge

    Open Access•Christina Boswell•Political Uses of Expert Knowledge•2009

  • The Social Construction of Policy Feedback

    Open Access•David Dagan, Steven M Teles•Studies in American Political…•2015

  • Advocacy coalitions and the practice of policy analysis

    Open Access•H Theodore Heintz, Hank C Jenkins‐smith et al.•Policy Sciences•1988

  • The lessons of learning

    Open Access•Colin J Bennett, Michael Howlett•Policy Sciences•1992

  • Policy termination as a political process

    Open Access•Eugene Bardach•Policy Sciences•1976

  • Research–Practice Partnerships in Education

    Open Access•Cynthia E Coburn, W R Penuel•Educational Researcher•2016

  • Strategy and Sophisticated Voting in the Senate

    Randall L Calvert, Richard F Fenno et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Mea Culpa? The Role of Data Collection in Public Officials Acknowledging Policy Failure

    Open Access•Sarah James•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2022

  • Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research

    Open Access•Andrew Karch•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2007

  • Failures

    Open Access•Craig Volden•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2016

  • The Role of Evaluation in Legislative Decision Making

    Allan Green•Public Administration Review•1984

  • The Lay of the Land

    Open Access•Thomas Brambor, Agustín Goenaga et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • When Do Ideas Matter

    Open Access•James I Walsh•Comparative Political Studies•2000

  • Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes

    Open Access•Fabrizio Gilardi•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making

    Open Access•Ian Sanderson•Public Administration•2002

  • Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion

    Open Access•Joshua M Blank, Daron R Shaw et al.•The Annals of the American…•2015

  • The Politics of Science

    Open Access•Elizabeth Suhay, James N Druckman•The Annals of the American…•2015

  • A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making

    Ivy N Defoe, Judith Semon Dubas et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2015

  • Two Faces of Power

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1962

  • The Global Diffusion of Public Policies

    Frank Dobbins, Frank Dobbin et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2007

Citations per year1.25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae