The First Liberal Democrat
Locke's Popular Government
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6400201 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Faulkner (0000-0002-8644-3181, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-40 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670500030503 |
| OpenAlex | W2100515597 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 9 |
This article discusses the democratic side of Locke's political thought, which is generally not appreciated. How is it that Lockean constitutionalism is also “popular government,” institutions, that is, but institutions considerably informed by a democratic spirit? The answer involves Locke's three characteristic innovations in institution-planning: “civil” government, a supreme “legislative” power coupled with a responsible executive, and,inter alia, a vigilant “majority”—a party or movement of the people with authority to elect to government and to rebel against any non-popular government. While Locke does raise up a powerful executive, he also makes it dependent as a rule on a rather democratic legislative. What Locke wishes to induce over time is something like parliamentary government, with the executive vested in a cabinet and the whole more or less responsible to the people in his sense, especially to a majority.To what extent are liberal democracies democratic? That question guides this reconsideration of the first and fundamental plan for liberal government, that of John Locke. I shall argue that Locke's plans are more democratic, and more radical too, than is generally believed. True, important parts of Locke's teaching correspond to undemocratic features with which we are now quite familiar. Liberal democracies have more or less capitalist economies in which wealth and big corporations are protected, they are moved not only by public opinion but also by liberal opinion-leaders of one stripe or another, they are governed not by the people in assembly but by constitutional governments
Cabinet (room · Constitutionalism · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Legislature · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Representative democracy · Separation of powers · Sociology · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America
James Otis and the Americanization of John Locke
On political participation, rights and redistribution
Executive Prerogative and the “Good Officer” in Thomas Jefferson's Letter to John B. Colvin
Sieyès’s idea of constituent power
Tocqueville's Tyranny of the Majority Reconsidered
The First Theorists of Liberal Democracy
Locke on Executive Power and Liberal Constitutionalism
Can the Prince Really Be Tamed? Executive Prerogative, Popular Apathy, and the Constitutional Frame in Locke'sSecond Treatise
Constitutionalism and the separation of powers
Natural Right and History
Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government
Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke, Peter Laslett
Common Law and Liberal Theory
Locke's Second Treatise and “The Best Fence Against Rebellion
Dictionary of the History of Ideas
John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority-Rule
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2025 (24) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |