Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Norway

Resources count, but votes decide? from neo-corporatist representation to neo-pluralist parliamentarism

Bibliographic Data

ID6406874
AuthorsHilmar Rommetvedt (0000-0002-7575-9113, International Research Institute of Stavanger, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume28
Issue4
Pages740-763
Publication date2005-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWest European Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01402380500216674
OpenAlexW2020401625
LanguageEN
Citations received26
References cited17

In comparative studies Norway is ranked at – or close to – the top of the list of corporatist countries. However, this picture needs to be updated. During the last part of the twentieth century significant changes have occurred in Norwegian society and politics. An ongoing process of pluralisation and dispersion of public and private power is paralleled by a process of parliamentarisation with regard to executive–legislative relations. The Norwegian parliament has become more active, less predictable and more influential compared with the executive. Corporatist representation has partly been replaced and partly supplemented by less institutionalised forms of lobbyism. In their attempts to influence policies, organised interests need to appeal to general interests in order to build broader coalitions. Entering the twenty-first century, we may ask whether Stein Rokkan's 'to-the-point' formulation in the 1960s should be turned round: resources count, but do votes now decide

Appeal · Corporatism · Legislature · Norwegian · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Representation (politics · Sociology · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Political Public Relations

    Viorela Dan, Øyvind Ihlen et al.•Political Public Relations•2019

  • Teachers Unions in the Nordic Countries

    Open Access•Susanne Wiborg•Comparative Politics of Education•2016

  • Civil associations and interest groups in the policy-making process

    Open Access•Andreas Nordang Uhre, Hilmar Rommetvedt•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2019

  • Bounded deliberation in public committees

    Silje Maria Tellmann•Critical Policy Studies•2016

  • Roles of citizens in environmental governance in the Information Age — four theoretical perspectives

    Open Access•Katrine Soma, Marleen C Onwezen et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2016

  • Lobbying and the Nordic Model

    Open Access•Øyvind Ihlen, Hilmar Rommetvedt et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Safety Considerations in Political Decisions

    Open Access•Ove Njå, Øivind Solberg•Review of Policy Research•2010

  • The emergence of PR consultants as part of the Finnish political communication elite

    Open Access•Lotta Lounasmeri•Journal of Contemporary European…•2018

  • Pluralism, corporatism and perception of corruption

    Open Access•Direnç Kanol•Journal of Public Affairs•2014

  • Interest group representation and framing in the media

    Open Access•Anne Skorkjær Binderkrantz•Journal of Public Affairs•2019

  • Policy Change in Comparative Contexts

    Adam Douglas Henry, Karin Ingold et al.•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2014

  • Varieties of Democracy

    Open Access•Peter Munk Christiansen, Asbjørn Sonne Nørgaard et al.•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2009

  • Access to climate policy-making in the European Union and in Norway

    Anne Therese Gullberg•Environmental Politics•2011

  • Governance as a Path to Government

    Klaus H Goetz•West European Politics•2008

  • Organised Interests, Authority Structures and Political Influence

    Open Access•Ståle Opedal, Hilmar Rommetvedt et al.•Scandinavian Political Studies•2012

  • Different governments, similar agendas? Analyzing more than seven decades of Norwegian policy agendas presented in executive speeches

    Open Access•Jens Jungblut, Tuva Marie Kavli et al.•Scandinavian Political Studies•2023

  • The Contemporary Relationship of ‘New Left’ and ‘New Right’ Parties with Interest Groups

    Open Access•Elin Haugsgjerd Allern•Scandinavian Political Studies•2013

  • Decorporatization and organized interests in public policymaking in Norway

    Open Access•Daniel Arnesen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2023

  • Lobbying Across Arenas

    Open Access•Helene Helboe Pedersen, Anne Skorkjær Binderkrantz et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Interest group framing in Denmark and the UK

    Anne Skorkjær Binderkrantz•Journal of European Public Policy•2020

  • Participation in Written Government Consultations in Denmark and the UK

    Open Access•Anne Rasmussen•Government and Opposition•2015

  • Parliamentary Government and Corporatism at the Crossroads

    Open Access•Hilmar Rommetvedt, Frode Veggeland•Government and Opposition•2019

  • Disrupted Exchange and Declining Corporatism

    Open Access•Perola Öberg, Torsten Svensson et al.•Government and Opposition•2011

  • Coping With Corporatism in Decline and the Revival of Parliament

    Open Access•Hilmar Rommetvedt, Gunnar Thesen et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • Sport and Politics

    Open Access•Nils Asle Bergsgard, Hilmar Rommetvedt•International Review for the…•2006

  • Political changemakers in Norway

    Open Access•Signe Bock Segaard•Acta Sociologica•2023

  • The hollow core

    Edward O Laumann, John P Heinz et al.•The hollow core•1993

  • Democratic Governance

    Mark Bevir•Democratic Governance•2010

  • The political consequences of electoral laws

    Douglas W Rae•The political consequences of…•1971

  • Rationality and Institutions

    Open Access•Jan-Erik Lane, Jan‐erik Lane•Open Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Patterns of Democracy

    Arend Lijphart•Patterns of Democracy•2017

  • Interest Groups in Norwegian Politics

    R E Gooderham•International Affairs•1977

  • Interest Group Influence in the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•Richard A Smith•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • Still the Century of Corporatism

    Open Access•Philippe C Schmitter•The Review of Politics•1974

  • Organized Grour>Government Relations in Norway

    Open Access•Tom Christensen, Morten Egeberg•Scandinavian Political Studies•1979

  • From Corporatism to Lobbyism? — Parliaments, Executives, and Organized Interests in Denmark and Norway

    Open Access•Peter Munk Christiansen, Hilmar Rommetvedt•Scandinavian Political Studies•1999

  • Modeling Policy Networks

    Open Access•Thomas König•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1998

  • The rise and decline of corporatism

    Open Access•Leif Lewin•European Journal of Political…•1994

  • Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies

    Open Access•Alan Siaroff•European Journal of Political…•1999

  • From Semisovereignty to Sovereignty

    Markus M L Crepaz•Comparative Politics•1994

  • Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries

    Open Access•Arend Lijphart, Markus M L Crepaz•British Journal of Political…•1991

Unique citing works26
Citations per year1,3
Citation span2006 - 2026 (21)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 26

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae