Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gender Turnover and Roll Call Voting in the US Senate

Bibliographic Data

ID6409828
AuthorsBrian Frederick (0000-0003-0653-5957, Bridgewater State University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume32
Issue3
Pages193-210
Publication date2011-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1554477x.2011.589281
OpenAlexW1978742924
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited38

Most studies looking at the roll call voting behavior of female legislators have investigated this phenomenon at the state legislative level and for the US House of Representatives. Very little research has looked at the impact of gender on the policy records of US senators. With the number of female senators continuing to increase it is now possible to undertake such an analysis. This study examines the influence of gender in predicting the roll call voting behavior of US senators across several recent congresses. To unearth gender effects, it employs a longitudinal design based on turnover in the Senate, which holds constituency constant while allowing gender and party to vary. The results indicate that male and female senators representing the same state compile very similar voting records on the basic left/right policy dimension. However, when votes on issues of concern to women are examined, female senators tend to be more supportive than the male senators they replaced, and male senators tend to be less supportive than the female senators they replaced

Demographic economics · Economics · Gender gap · Legislature · Phenomenon · Political science · Politics · Roll call · State (computer science · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Gender and Welfare States

    Open Access•Marie Laperrière, Ann Shola Orloff•Handbook of the Sociology of Gender•2018

  • Gender, Power, and Colleague Aggression in U.S. State Senates

    Open Access•Robert Herrick, Sue Thomas et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • Gendered Polarization and Abortion Policymaking in the States

    Open Access•Abigail A Matthews, Rebecca J Kreitzer et al.•The Forum•2020

  • The Intersection of Candidate Gender and Ethnicity

    Open Access•Martina Santia, Nichole M Bauer•The International Journal of…•2022

  • At the Intersection of Gender and Party

    Open Access•Amy Friesenhahn•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • A longitudinal test of the gender turnover model among U.S. House and Senate members

    Open Access•Brian Frederick•The Social Science Journal•2015

  • What causes threats directed at the president

    Open Access•Lucas Lothamer, Lucas J Lothamer et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Pursuing Women’s Interests in Partisan Times

    Michele L Swers•Women & Politics•2016

  • Not Just Sticks and Stones

    Open Access•Robert Herrick, Rebekah Herrick et al.•Politics & Gender•2021

  • Gender and Welfare States

    Open Access•Marie Laperrière, Ann Shola Orloff•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2018

  • Gender and Race in Congressional National News Media Appearances in 2008

    Jennifer C Lucas, Jennifer Lucas•Politics & Gender•2017

  • The Limits of Gendered Leadership

    Dana E Wittmer, Vanessa Bouché•Politics & Gender•2013

  • Women’s Issues and Their Fates in the US Congress

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman et al.•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics

    Open Access•Monica C Schneider, Angela L Bos•Political Psychology•2019

  • Clergywomen, women’s ordination, and “women’s issues

    Open Access•Cammie Jo Bolin•Politics and Religion•2025

  • Working Mothers Represent

    Open Access•Lisa A Bryant, Julia Marin Hellwege•American Politics Research•2019

  • Unorthodox Lawmaking

    Barbara Sinclair•Unorthodox Lawmaking: New…•2017

  • A Woman's Place Is in the House

    Barbara Burrell, Barbara C Burrell•A Woman's Place Is in the House•1994

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • The Impact of Women in Congress

    Debra L Dodson•The Impact of Women in Congress…•2006

  • Party Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith•Party Influence in Congress•2007

  • Filibuster

    Gregory J Wawro, Eric Schickler•Filibuster•2013

  • Support for Women's Interests in the 103rd Congress

    Julie Dolan•Women & Politics•1998

  • Voting Patterns in the California Assembly

    Sue Thomas•Women & Politics•1989

  • Changing minds? Not in Congress

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Public Choice•2007

  • Sex and the Statehouse

    Open Access•R Edward Hogan•Social Science Quarterly•2008

  • Personal Attributes and Latino Voting Behavior in Congress

    Open Access•Michael S Rocca, G R Sanchez et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2008

  • Culture Wars in the Congressional Theater

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Oldmixon•Social Science Quarterly•2002

  • Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures

    Kathleen A Bratton, Kerry L Haynie•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Uncovering the Dimensionality of Gender Voting in Congress

    Open Access•Noelle H Norton•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Are Women More Liberal than Men in the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•Susan Welch•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1985

  • Gender Turnover and Roll‐Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Leslie A Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A Schwindt‐bayer et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Gender and Patterns of Roll Call Voting in the U.S. Senate

    Brian Frederick•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • Voting patterns in the California assembly

    Sue Thomas•Women & Politics•1989

  • Dividers, Not Uniters

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Are Voters Better Represented

    John D Griffin, Brian Newman•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Women and Representation

    Open Access•Jessica C Gerrity, Tracy Osborn et al.•Politics & Gender•2007

  • Quasi-Experimental Design, Constituency, and Advancing Women’s Interests

    Open Access•Jason A Macdonald, Erin E O'Brien et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Sarah Poggione•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Building a Reputation on National Security

    Open Access•Michele Swers, Michele L Swers•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues

    Open Access•Michele L Swers•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1998

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93

    William D Berry, Evan J Ringquist et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship Between Descriptive and Substantive Representation

    Brian Frederick•Congress & the Presidency•2009

  • Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections

    Open Access•Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1986

Unique citing works16
Citations per year1,23
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae