How to deliver gender diversity education to men
Training algorithms to the rescue
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6415426 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Radostina Purvanova (0000-0002-6161-4300, Drake University Zimpleman College of Business Des Moines Iowa USA, corresponding author), Andrew Bryant (0000-0003-2899-9568, University of North Carolina Wilmington Cameron School of Business Wilmington North Carolina USA) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Applied Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-994X • E-ISSN: 1464-0597 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/apps.12571 |
| OpenAlex | W4402174971 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 55 |
Gender diversity training is typically provided to mix‐gender audiences. This one‐size‐fits‐all approach may be suboptimal because information about gender bias and inequity is often received differently along gender lines: men are less likely than women to believe it. We argue for tailoring gender diversity training via implementing segmentation and tailoring algorithms in training systems. To develop our theorizing, we integrate a learner‐centric approach to diversity training with principles of jiu jitsu persuasion theory. This leads us to test a new approach to diversity training that involves dynamic adaptation and tailoring the training to learners. Specifically, we first identify two distinct segments of men—believers and skeptics—and develop a user‐friendly segmentation algorithm that segments men, in real time, using only five items (Study 1). We then use the algorithm to assign segments of men trainees to tailored or non‐tailored training and show that presenting skeptic men with a tailored message improves training reactions and increases intentions to support gender diversity efforts (Study 2). Thus, we show that dynamic adaptation and tailoring successfully explain training outcomes, particularly for trainees who are skeptical of the diversity message. Practically, our study demonstrates the functionality and value of segmentation algorithms for organizations' training systems
Adaptation (eye · Algorithm · Diversity (politics · Diversity training · Gender diversity · Machine learning · Management · Persuasion · Segmentation · Skepticism · Sociology · Training (meteorology · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Data clustering
The mixed effects of online diversity training
Prejudice Reduction
The Science of Training
Shifting Republican views on climate change through targeted advertising
Incorporating Social-Marketing Insights Into Prejudice Research
Nudge me right
The EThIC Model of Virtue-Based Allyship Development
Taking Gender Into Account
Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government
Using implicit bias training to improve attitudes toward women in STEM
The rich get richer
Can Evidence Impact Attitudes? Public Reactions to Evidence of Gender Bias in STEM Fields
Using Video to Increase Gender Bias Literacy Toward Women in Science
Predicting employee attitudes to workplace diversity from personality, values, and cognitive ability
Gendered affordance perception and unequal domestic labour
Learning about Difference, Learning with Others, Learning to Transgress
A gender bias habit-breaking intervention led to increased hiring of female faculty in STEMM departments
Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion
The two disciplines of scientific psychology
Champions of gender equality
Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS)
"Why People "Don't Trust the Evidence
A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |