Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why Chinese Farmers Resist Land Expropriation

Bibliographic Data

ID6415992
AuthorsYuting Yao (0000-0001-7281-2065, corresponding author), Hui Wang (0000-0001-5109-8691)
Year2025
Volume66
Issue3
Pages1-35
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Survey (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-4687 • E-ISSN: 1533-838X
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/as.2025.2724462
OpenAlexW7103748296
LanguageEN
References cited12

This study addresses the paradoxical coexistence of advancing reforms to the land expropriation system and persistence of resistance to land expropriation in contemporary China. Building on institutional theory and procedural legitimacy frameworks, we investigate how implementation failures by local governments and village collectives shape farmers’ resistance behaviors, mediated by the development of rules consciousness. Our multilevel analysis of large-scale survey data has two key findings. First, procedural violations by implementing agencies show a direct positive correlation with incidence of resistance. Second, farmers’ understanding of formal procedures significantly influences their rules consciousness, creating a mediation effect that intensifies responses to procedural deviations. These results challenge conventional policy assumptions by revealing an institutional reflexivity paradox: while policy dissemination enhances farmers’ legal awareness, the very procedural shortcuts that once facilitated efficient land transfers now systematically compromise implementation effectiveness

Compromise · Expropriation · Legitimacy · Mediation · Reflexivity · Resistance (ecology · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Land Rights and Reforms

  • An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining

    Open Access•Werner Güth, Rolf Schmittberger et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•1982

  • Rights Consciousness and Rules Consciousness in Contemporary China

    Lianjiang Li•The China Journal•2010

  • The Issue of ‘Land-lost’ Farmers in the People’s Republic of China

    Hongping Lian, Anthony Glendinning et al.•Journal of Contemporary China•2016

  • Land Leasing and Local Public Finance in China’s Regional Development

    Open Access•Ran Tao, Ran Tao Ran Tao et al.•Urban Studies•2010

  • A Protest Society Evaluated

    Chih-Jou Jay Chen•Mobilization An International…•2020

  • Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action

    Martijn Van Zomeren, Tom Postmes et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2008

  • The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century

    Edward P Thompson•Past & Present•1971

  • Rural land dispossession in China and India

    Joel Andreas, Sunila S Kale et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2020

  • Sugarcoating the bitter pill

    Meina Cai, Jennifer Brick Murtazashivili et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2020

  • Non-farm futures and the dispossessed

    Mihika Chatterjee•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2020

  • Land use planning, dispossession and contestation in Goa, India

    Open Access•Solano Da Silva, Kenneth Bo Nielsen et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2020

  • Making the political, and doing politics

    Nikita Sud•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae