Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Congressional rhetoric on Twitter and the crisis of democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID6420168
AuthorsChristopher J Miller (0000-0002-0632-1484, University of Richmond), Yucong Jiang (0000-0002-1486-5916, University of Richmond)
Year2025
Volume59
Issue1
Pages161-204
Publication date2025-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommunication and Democracy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-1127 • E-ISSN: 2767-1135
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/27671127.2025.2478863
OpenAlexW4408967835
LanguageEN
References cited102

Democracy · Linguistics · Media studies · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics

  • Corpus Analysis of Political Language

    Open Access•Alan Partington•Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics•2012

  • Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication

    Kate Kenski, Kathleen Hall Jamieson•The Oxford Handbook of Political…•2017

  • The Distorting Prism of Social Media

    Open Access•Jin Woo Kim, Allison M Gue et al.•Journal of Communication•2021

  • There must be a villain

    B Mclaughlin, Joshua A Dunn et al.•Communication Quarterly•2023

  • Beyond Ideology

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Beyond Ideology•2009

  • The Language of Extremism on Social Media

    Open Access•Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, Ian Hawkins•Frontiers in Political Science•2022

  • The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

    Open Access•Nicolas Berlinski, Margaret Doyle et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021

  • The Validity of Sentiment Analysis

    Open Access•Wouter Van Atteveldt, Mariken A C G Van Der Velden et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2021

  • Three Gaps in Computational Text Analysis Methods for Social Sciences

    Open Access•Christian Baden, Christian Pipal et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2021

  • News Organizations 2.0

    Open Access•A Al-Rawi•Journalism Practice•2016

  • Is Nationalism on the Rise? Assessing Global Trends

    Florian Bieber•Ethnopolitics•2018

  • Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing

    Open Access•Tyler Johnson•Politics & Policy•2012

  • U.S. Senators on Twitter

    Open Access•Annelise Russell•American Politics Research•2017

  • David Mayhew's Congress

    Patricia A Hurley•PS Political Science & Politics•2001

  • Securitization of media reporting on climate change? A cross-national analysis in nine countries

    Open Access•Mike S Schäfer, Jürgen Scheffran et al.•Security Dialogue•2015

  • Democracy and disrespect

    Open Access•Jan-Werner Müller, Jan‐werner Müller•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2019

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Friendship Fictions

    Christine Harold•Quarterly Journal of Speech•2011

  • Deflecting deliberation through rhetorical nihilism

    Thomas A Salek•Communication and Democracy•2023

  • Engagement with incivility in tweets from and directed at local elected officials

    A Rain, Stephen A Rains et al.•Communication and Democracy•2023

  • Weathering and weaponizing the #TwitterPurge

    Stefan Gorißen•Communication and Democracy•2024

  • The rhetoric of democracy in United States Senate campaign debates

    Josh C Bramlett, Joel Lansing Reed et al.•Communication and Democracy•2024

  • At stake in the rules of communication is democratic life itself

    Kevin A Johnson, Kevin Johnson•Communication and Democracy•2022

  • The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate

    Open Access•Steven W Webster, Alan I Abramowitz•American Politics Research•2017

  • Unfastening the Electoral Connection

    Robert Herrick, Rebekah Herrick et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven Webster et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964)

    Philip E Converse•Critical Review•2006

  • Congress and the Polarity Paradox

    Lawrence Cloyd Dodd, Scot Schraufnagel•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses

    Open Access•Miguel E Roberts, Margaret E Roberts et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Ideologues without Issues

    Open Access•L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • Trump Tweets and Democratic Attitudes

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Miguel Carreras et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Negative Partisanship

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven W Webster•Political Psychology•2018

  • Liberal and Conservative Values

    Open Access•Kevin L Jones, Sharareh Noorbaloochi et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  • Affective News

    Lori Young, Stuart Soroka•Political Communication•2012

  • Computational Identification of Media Frames

    Tom Nicholls, P D Culpepper•Political Communication•2021

  • (Re)Claiming Our Expertise

    Ashley Muddiman, Shannon C Mcgregor et al.•Political Communication•2019

  • The Automatic Analysis of Emotion in Political Speech Based on Transcripts

    Christopher Cochrane, Ludovic Rheault et al.•Political Communication•2022

  • Enemy Mine

    Open Access•Hannah M Ridge•Political Behavior•2022

  • The Relationship Between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context

    Open Access•Yanna Krupnikov, Nichole M Bauer•Political Behavior•2014

  • Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters

    Open Access•Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky•Political Behavior•2010

  • Playing with Emotions

    Open Access•Keena Lipsitz•Political Behavior•2018

  • Text as Data

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer, Brandon M Stewart et al.•Political Analysis•2013

  • An Improved Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science

    Open Access•Connor T Jerzak, Gary King et al.•Political Analysis•2023

  • Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies

    Open Access•Ariel Malka, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • Testing Theories of American Politics

    Open Access•Martin Gilens, Benjamin I Page•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • Creature Comforts

    Emily Ray•New Political Science•2021

  • Who Represents the Constituency? Online Political Communication by Members of Parliament in the German Mixed‐Member Electoral System

    Open Access•Lena Schürmann, Sebastian Stier•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Measuring Congressional Partisanship and Its Consequences

    Open Access•Jeremy Gelman, Shanika L Wilson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Do perceptions of electoral malpractice undermine democratic satisfaction? The US in comparative perspective

    Open Access•P Norris•International Political Science…•2019

  • On Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Nancy Bermeo•Journal of democracy•2016

  • The Age of Political Fragmentation

    Open Access•Richard H Pildes•Journal of democracy•2021

  • Re-election

    Open Access•Osnat Akirav•Government and Opposition•2015

  • Party Polarization in American Politics

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2006

  • Political Theory of Populism

    Nadia Urbinati•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

  • Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model

    Randall L Calvert•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • The Nature of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nicholas C Dias, Nicholas Dias et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage

    Tim Groseclose•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Lexical Ambiguity in Political Rhetoric

    Open Access•Patrick W Kraft, Robert Klemmensen•British Journal of Political…•2024

  • Pandemic Messaging

    Tanya Gardner, Annelise Russell•Congress & the Presidency•2023

  • Nothing to See Here

    C Danielle Vinson, Jacob M Lollis•Congress & the Presidency•2023

  • Let’s Get Ready to Tweet! An Analysis of Twitter Use by 2018 Senate Candidates

    J Scott Granberg-Rademacker, J Scott Granberg‐rademacker et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2021

  • Political Attacks in 280 Characters or Less

    Open Access•Vladislav Petkevic, Alessandro Nai•American Politics Research•2022

  • How Partisanship Influences What Congress Says Online and How They Say It

    Open Access•Richard T Wang, Patrick D Tucker et al.•American Politics Research•2021

  • Populism and the 2016 American Election

    Open Access•Corina Lacatus•PS Political Science & Politics•2019

  • Negative Sentiment and Congressional Cue-Taking on Social Media

    Open Access•Maggie Macdonald, Annelise Russell et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2023

  • Contemporary Views of Liberal Democracy and the 2016 Presidential Election

    Open Access•William D Hicks, Seth C Mckee et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • Delegitimizing the media

    Open Access•Jana Laura Egelhofer, Loes Aaldering et al.•Journal of Language and Politics•2021

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Big Data, Digital Media, and Computational Social Science

    Open Access•Dhavan V Shah, Joseph N Cappella et al.•The Annals of the American…•2015

  • The fabrics of machine moderation

    Open Access•Bernhard Rieder, Yarden Skop•Big Data & Society•2021

  • What, If Anything, Do Populism and Conspiracy Theories Have to Do with Each Other

    Jan-Werner Müller, Jan‐werner Müller•Social research•2022

  • Going negative

    Open Access•Andrew S Ro, Andrew S Ross et al.•Language & Communication•2020

  • Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction

    Open Access•Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Doron Taussig•Political Science Quarterly•2017

  • What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy Require

    Open Access•Robert A Dahl•Political Science Quarterly•2005

  • Twitter Use by Presidential Primary Candidates During the 2012 Campaign

    Open Access•Bethany Anne Conway, Kate Kenski et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2013

  • The Dynamics of Political Incivility on Twitter

    Open Access•Yannis Theocharis, Pablo Barberá Aresté et al.•SAGE Open•2020

  • Candidate Motivation

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Polarization and Democratic Accountability in the 2020 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Rachel Lynn Bitecofer, Rachel Bitecofer•Society•2020

  • The Psychological Meaning of Words

    Open Access•Yla R Tausczik, Yla Tausczik et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2010

  • The Future of Coding

    Open Access•Livingston Krumah Nelson, Laura K Nelson et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae