Fabriquer Le Désir. Histoire de La Mode de L'antiquité À Nos Jours
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | New York University, University of North Texas, University of Guelph, Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand., Department of Sociology and Anthropology, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina., INIBIOMA (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue), San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina., Anthropology, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada., Simon Fraser University, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Institute of Economic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Blvd, Bronx, NY 10458., CNRS-LEEISA (USR 3456), Cayenne, French Guiana., Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia., School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, BC, Canada., United Tribes Technical College, Bismarck, North Dakota., Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, United Kingdom., Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK., Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology Graduate Program, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada., Centro de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias sobre Chiapas y la Frontera Sur, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Chiapas, México., University College London, Biocultural Education and Research Programme, St. James, Barbados., Institute of Economic Botany |
| ANO | 2020 |
| TIPO | Book |
| CITAÇÕES | 22 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-14 |
| MD5 |
BE7D5FDEBAE5FE063FFC63CE3A2EA157
|
Resumo
Ethnobiology, like many fields, was shaped by early Western imperial efforts to colonize people and lands around the world and extract natural resources. Those legacies and practices persist today and continue to influence the institutions ethnobiologists are a part of, how they carry out research, and their personal beliefs and actions. Various authors have previously outlined five overlapping 'phases' of ethnobiology. Here, we argue that ethnobiology should move toward a sixth phase in which scholars and practitioners must actively challenge colonialism, racism, and oppressive structures embedded within their institutions, projects, and themselves. As an international group of ethnobiologists and scholars from allied fields, we identified key topics and priorities at three levels: at the institutional scale, we argue for repatriation/rematriation of biocultural heritage, accessibility of published work, and realignment of priorities to support community-driven research. At the level of projects, we emphasize the need for mutual dialogue, reciprocity, community research self-sufficiency, and research questions that support sovereignty of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities over lands and waters. Finally, for individual scholars, we support self-reflection on language use, co-authorship, and implicit bias. We advocate for concrete actions at each of these levels to move the field further toward social justice, antiracism, and decolonization.