Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Systems Methods for Systemic Problems

A Case Study of Poor Lawyer Wellbeing

Bibliographic Data

ID6423936
AuthorsMatt Healey (0000-0002-9618-6123, First Person Consulting, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Marshal N Miller, Madelinne Miller (0009-0009-3002-7769, First Person Consulting, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Joseph Lea (0009-0004-2045-0487, First Person Consulting, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Lucy Fraser (0009-0002-5109-4134, Victorian Legal Services Board + Commissioner, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), Lionel Fraser (Legal Aid New South Wales)
Year2025
Volume25
Issue3
Pages213-232
Publication date2025-07-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEvaluation Journal of Australasia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1035-719X • E-ISSN: 2515-9372
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1035719x251358851
OpenAlexW4412111227
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited24

This article demonstrates how integrating a systems perspective – specifically through the System Effects methodology – can strengthen Theory of Change processes for addressing complex issues. Using a recent project on poor lawyer wellbeing as a case study, we outline the rationale and process for applying the System Effects methodology to map the interconnected drivers of poor lawyer wellbeing. Through this approach, we identified four multi-level problem statements that capture the most influential causal factors, providing a nuanced understanding of systemic challenges within the legal profession. These findings serve as a foundation for developing a more contextually grounded and robust Theory of Change. We reflect on the value of systems approaches in strengthening the rigour and relevance of theory-based evaluations in complex environments and offer practical guidance for evaluators seeking to apply systems methodologies in their practice

Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Psychology

  • The Super Six Ideas Shaping Evaluation in Australia

    Open Access•Carina Calzoni, Amy Gullickson et al.•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2026

  • Systems thinking

    Open Access•Derek Cabrera, Laura Colosi et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2008

  • Systems science and systems thinking for public health

    Open Access•Gemma Carey, Eleanor Malbon et al.•BMJ Open•2015

  • Success of community-based system dynamics in prevention interventions

    Open Access•Tiana Felmingham, Kathryn Backholer et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible

    Open Access•Carol Bacchi•Open Journal of Political Science•2012

  • Inductive/Deductive Hybrid Thematic Analysis in Mixed Methods Research

    Open Access•Kevin Proudfoot•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2022

  • Building a system-based Theory of Change using Participatory Systems Mapping

    Open Access•Helen Wilkinson, Dione Hills et al.•Evaluation•2021

  • Learning from seasoned evaluators

    Open Access•Emily Gates, Emily F Gates•Evaluation•2017

  • Participatory systems mapping for complex energy policy evaluation

    Open Access•Peter Barbrook-Johnson, Alexandra S Penn et al.•Evaluation•2021

  • Causal mapping for evaluators

    Open Access•Steve Powell, James Copestake et al.•Evaluation•2023

  • System Effects

    Luke K Craven, Luke Craven•Annals of the American…•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae