Housing in progress
Caring for and living in unfinished remittance houses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6425762 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lauren B Wagner (0000-0002-4778-7408, Maastricht University, corresponding author), Joma Ronden (Maastricht University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 168 |
| Pages | 104479-104479 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geoforum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104479 |
| OpenAlex | W4416537440 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 24 |
Empty, unfinished, or ‘ghost’ houses are common sights around the world, where aspirational investment in housing outpaces the potential to physically occupy it. While these structures may be only partially completed, this does not mean they are unoccupied. In fact, their state of incompleteness can prompt owners to find an occupant, in order to prevent incursion, protect the existing investment in construction, and enable incremental progress towards completion. This paper explores one configuration of housing investment – ‘remittance houses’, constructed by migrants – and the dynamics of caretaking and guardianship that arise to protect these housing structures while they are in-process over an unpredictable, multiple-year timeline. Building on two case studies, in Morocco and Ghana, we investigate both the lives of the houses in-progress and the accommodations and adaptations made by live-in caretakers to make them into dwell-able homes. These simultaneous and interwoven timelines involve uncertain futures for both the house and its occupants, as the more ‘complete’ the house becomes, the more uncertain the caretaker’s tenure. We bring into question how the framework of ‘care’ as mutually transformative development can help to understand the affective and embodied investments made by the migrant who is building the home and the caretaker occupying and adapting it, in relation to the material responsiveness of the house itself. We take these mutual transformations as resonant not just for these houses which are markedly ‘unfinished’, but as a way to consider how much housing is somehow ‘in progress’ and complexly constituted through care.
Embodied cognition · Futures contract · Investment (military) · Order (exchange) · Remittance · State (computer science) · Timeline · Transformative learning · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Architecture · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies · Urban and Rural Development Challenges
The house unbuilt
A Place to Stay in Pakistan’
Shaky Foundations
Trouble at home
Precarious Territory
A Neglected Aspect of the Housing Market
Constructing Homes, Building Relationships
Separation, Connection, and the Ambiguous Nature of Émigré Houses in Rural Highland Madagascar
Living precariously
Entangled agencies, material networks and repair in a building assemblage
Notes on a Southern urban practice
Labour Migration and Ties of Relatedness
The New Ruins of Ireland? Unfinished Estates in the Post-Celtic Tiger Era
The living building
On the theoretical potential of 'remittance houses
Retiring Home? House Construction, Age Inscriptions, and the Building of Belonging among Mexican Migrants and their Families in Chicago and Rural Mexico
Unbuilt and Unfinished
Self-precarization and the spatial imaginaries of property guardianship
Migrating-remitting-'building'-dwelling
Uncertain Futures
Inside-Out Houses
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |