Housing and mental health inequalities during Covid-19
The Role of Income and Housing Support Measures
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6427668 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ang Li (0000-0002-6269-6432, The University of Melbourne, autor correspondente), Emma Baker (0000-0002-9390-0491, The University of Adelaide), Rebecca Bentley (0000-0003-3334-7353, The University of Melbourne) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 1379-1400 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-06-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Housing Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0267-3037 • E-ISSN: 1466-1810 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02673037.2024.2366961 |
| OpenAlex | W4400126756 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 41 |
The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted people's mental health and wellbeing. Using a national dataset of >11,000 Australians collected before and during the first two years of the pandemic, this study examines housing and mental health effects of COVID-19, and the extent to which access to government income support (social security measures, crisis payments and wage subsidy), early superannuation withdrawal, mortgage and rent relief, and tenant eviction moratoriums offered protection. Results show that the mental health gap between private rental and more secure housing tenures and between good- and poor-quality housing widened during the pandemic. Government income support provided a social safety net and was important in buffering housing instability especially when strong eviction moratoriums were lacking. Mortgage relief measures were associated significantly lower risks of housing affordability stress. Strong eviction moratoriums were effective in reducing risks of residential instability and forced moves. The pandemic exposed health vulnerabilities generated from people's housing circumstances, reinforcing the need for public policies to address these social inequities to improve health and wellbeing. Findings emphasise the importance of tenure security, housing quality and enforcement of rental market interventions during disasters and identify the benefits of policies providing income support and strong eviction protection
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Demographic economics · Economic inequality · Economics · Inequality · Mental health · Psychiatry · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Homelessness and Social Issues · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Virology
Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (Iqola) Project
Living in a cold and damp home
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it
Covid-19 Housing Policy
Financial hardship and social assistance as determinants of mental health and food and housing insecurity during the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States
Covid-19 Lockdown
Covid-19 and Emergency Rental Assistance
Green and blue spaces, Covid-19 lockdowns, and mental health
Understanding the mental health impacts of poor quality private-rented housing during the UK's first Covid-19 lockdown
Experiencing housing precarity in the private rental sector during the covid-19 pandemic
Widening the gap
Covid-19 and the meaning of home
Housing and health
The Covid-19 pandemic and health inequalities
Housing and health inequities during Covid-19
Covid-19 lockdown and housing deprivation across European countries
Understanding the mental health effects of instability in the private rental sector
How do state policies shape experiences of household income shocks and mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |