Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does the discrimination and exclusion of traditional health practitioners in South African national health insurance foster inequality of access to health care

Bibliographic Data

ID6429332
AuthorsCharles Maimela (0000-0001-6529-3172, University of Johannesburg, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume25
Issue4
Pages438-450
Publication date2025-10-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Discrimination and the Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1358-2291 • E-ISSN: 2047-9468
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/13582291251379287
OpenAlexW4415295945
LanguageEN

In order to close the gap between public and private health care services in South Africa and ensure the realisation of the constitutional right to access to health care services (under section 27), National Health Insurance (NHI) has been introduced by the government to ensure equity and parity of access to health care services. This article provides a general overview of the NHI Bill, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of NHI and its future implementation in South Africa, and interrogates universal healthcare coverage and National Health Insurance through the lens of traditional health practitioners. Traditional health practitioners treat the majority of people in rural and urban parts of South Africa and often face discrimination when it comes to the provision of health care services

HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses · Human Rights and Development · Legal Issues in South Africa

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae