Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond the Binary

A New Typology for Evaluating Warning Success and Failure in Strategic Surprise

Bibliographic Data

ID6431025
AuthorsNikki Ikani (0000-0001-7625-0530, Leiden University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume27
Issue1
Publication date2025-02-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Studies Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1468-2486 • E-ISSN: 1521-9488
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/isr/viaf009
OpenAlexW4409293763
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited62

Why do some intelligence warning processes succeed in anticipating surprise while others fail? This article challenges the binary perspective on warning success and warning failure prevalent in extant analyses, which it contends ignores the complexity of warning processes and their outcomes. Its main thesis is that warning success rather exists on a spectrum of outcomes from full success to complete failure. To support this argument, this article introduces a novel, multidimensional typology that captures warning outcomes on such a spectrum, aligning with approaches to measuring (foreign) policy success within political science and public administration. It dissects warning effectiveness into three dimensions: the analytical (accuracy and timeliness of threat understanding), process (effectiveness of warning communication), and political dimensions (degree of decision-maker receptivity). Inherent tensions and challenges within these dimensions are expected to produce trade-offs, where success in one dimension may not ensure success in others. By applying this typology to three illustrative case studies—the COVID-19 pandemic warning in the United Kingdom, the Russian interference in the 2016 US election campaign, and the EU's warning process preceding the Crimea annexation—this paper demonstrates that warning performance often varies significantly across the three dimensions, highlighting the trade-offs and conflicts that can occur. This typology challenges existing binary paradigms and enables a more comprehensive understanding of warning effectiveness. This may inform targeted, adaptive, and effective security policy responses, in addition to improving our understanding of strategic surprise anticipation and warning strategies

Binary number · Political science · Sociology · Surprise · Typology · Anthropology · Forecasting Techniques and Applications · Mathematics · Psychology · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Social Psychology

  • Leveraging data science to investigate intelligence failures

    Open Access•Leonard Kern, Kristian Gustafson et al.•Intelligence & National Security•2026

  • Warning intelligence in the digital afterlife of Iraqi Ba’thism

    Hayder Alkilabi•Intelligence & National Security•2026

  • Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis

    Open Access•Stephen S Morse, Jonna A K Mazet et al.•The Lancet•2012

  • Status quo bias in decision making

    Open Access•William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1988

  • Modern political analysis

    Robert Alan Dahl•Modern political analysis•1991

  • An analytical framework for postmortems of European foreign policy

    Open Access•Nikki Ikani, Aviva Guttmann et al.•Intelligence & National Security•2020

  • Preventing Intelligence Failures by Learning from the Past

    Stephen Marrin•International Journal of…•2004

  • Between warning and response

    Abraham Ben‐zvi•International Journal of…•1990

  • Learning from Intelligence Failures

    John Hollister Hedley•International Journal of…•2005

  • Are Intelligence Failures Still Inevitable

    Open Access•James J Wirtz•International Journal of…•2024

  • Pearl Harbor

    Roberta Wohlstetter•Pearl Harbor•1962

  • Governing after Crisis

    Open Access•Thomas Preston, José A Olmeda et al.•Governing after Crisis•2008

  • Fast Response to Superspreading

    Open Access•Lukas Zenk, Gerald Steiner et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Bolt from the Blue or Avoidable Failure? Revisiting September 11 and the Origins of Strategic Surprise

    Open Access•Charles F Parker, Eric Stern•Foreign Policy Analysis•2005

  • The Perfect Intelligence Failure? U.S. Pre‐War Intelligence on Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction

    Open Access•Mark Phythian•Politics & Policy•2006

  • Response to James Lebovic's review of Why Intelligence Fails

    Open Access•Robert Jervis•Perspectives on Politics•2010

  • Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

    Open Access•Glenn A Bowen•Qualitative Research Journal•2009

  • Intelligence and Strategic Surprises Revisited

    Ariel Levite•International Studies Quarterly•1989

  • Intelligence for Policymaking

    Richard K Betts•The Washington Quarterly•1980

  • From Prediction to Learning

    Richard K Herrmann, Richard Herrmann et al.•International Security•2007

  • Why Economic Sanctions Still Do Not Work

    Robert A Pape•International Security•1998

  • September 11 and the Adaptation Failure of U.S. Intelligence Agencies

    Amy B Zegart, Amy Zegart•International Security•2005

  • Surprise and Change in International Politics

    Michael I Handel•International Security•1980

  • Surprise Attack

    Richard K Betts•International Security•1981

  • Intelligence and the problem of strategic surprise∗

    Michael I Handel•Journal of Strategic Studies•1984

  • Change and Continuity in the European Neighbourhood Policy

    Nikki Ikani•Geopolitics•2019

  • Early Warning and Response

    Open Access•Howard Adelman, Astri Suhrke•Disasters•1996

  • Hindsight and Foresight

    Open Access•Abraham Ben-Zvi, Abraham Ben‐zvi•World Politics•1976

  • Analysis, War, and Decision

    Open Access•Richard K Betts•World Politics•1978

  • Bureaucratic Politics

    Open Access•Graham T Allison, Morton H Halperin•World Politics•1972

  • An Improvised Patchwork

    Open Access•Sean Atkin, Sean Atkins et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research

    Open Access•Jason Seawright, John Gerring•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Blindsided? September 11 and the Origins of Strategic Surprise

    Open Access•Charles F Parker, Eric K Stern et al.•Political Psychology•2002

  • Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between

    Open Access•Allan Mcconnell•Journal of Public Policy•2010

  • The Yom Kippur War and the Inevitability of Surprise

    Michael I Handel•International Studies Quarterly•1977

  • From ‘Normal Incidents’ to Political Crises

    Open Access•Annika Brändström, Sanneke Kuiper et al.•Government and Opposition•2003

  • Strategic Surprise and the September 11 Attacks

    Daniel Byman•Annual Review of Political Science•2005

  • Success and Failure in Foreign Policy

    David A Baldwin•Annual Review of Political Science•2000

  • Process Tracing and Historical Explanation

    James Mahoney•Security Studies•2015

  • What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze

    Open Access•Allan Mcconnell•Public Policy and Administration•2015

  • Intelligence Failure Retrained

    Open Access•John A Gentry•Political Science Quarterly•2008

  • The Idea and Practice of Conflict Prevention

    Open Access•Alice Ackermann•Journal of Peace Research•2003

  • The Intelligence of Stupidity

    Open Access•Steve Chan•American Political Science Review•1979

  • Peering into the Future

    Joseph S Nye•Foreign Affairs•1994

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae