Beyond the Binary
A New Typology for Evaluating Warning Success and Failure in Strategic Surprise
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6431025 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nikki Ikani (0000-0001-7625-0530, Leiden University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Studies Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-2486 • E-ISSN: 1521-9488 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/isr/viaf009 |
| OpenAlex | W4409293763 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 62 |
Why do some intelligence warning processes succeed in anticipating surprise while others fail? This article challenges the binary perspective on warning success and warning failure prevalent in extant analyses, which it contends ignores the complexity of warning processes and their outcomes. Its main thesis is that warning success rather exists on a spectrum of outcomes from full success to complete failure. To support this argument, this article introduces a novel, multidimensional typology that captures warning outcomes on such a spectrum, aligning with approaches to measuring (foreign) policy success within political science and public administration. It dissects warning effectiveness into three dimensions: the analytical (accuracy and timeliness of threat understanding), process (effectiveness of warning communication), and political dimensions (degree of decision-maker receptivity). Inherent tensions and challenges within these dimensions are expected to produce trade-offs, where success in one dimension may not ensure success in others. By applying this typology to three illustrative case studies—the COVID-19 pandemic warning in the United Kingdom, the Russian interference in the 2016 US election campaign, and the EU's warning process preceding the Crimea annexation—this paper demonstrates that warning performance often varies significantly across the three dimensions, highlighting the trade-offs and conflicts that can occur. This typology challenges existing binary paradigms and enables a more comprehensive understanding of warning effectiveness. This may inform targeted, adaptive, and effective security policy responses, in addition to improving our understanding of strategic surprise anticipation and warning strategies
Binary number · Political science · Sociology · Surprise · Typology · Anthropology · Forecasting Techniques and Applications · Mathematics · Psychology · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Social Psychology
Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis
Status quo bias in decision making
Modern political analysis
An analytical framework for postmortems of European foreign policy
Preventing Intelligence Failures by Learning from the Past
Between warning and response
Learning from Intelligence Failures
Are Intelligence Failures Still Inevitable
Pearl Harbor
Governing after Crisis
Fast Response to Superspreading
Bolt from the Blue or Avoidable Failure? Revisiting September 11 and the Origins of Strategic Surprise
The Perfect Intelligence Failure? U.S. Pre‐War Intelligence on Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction
Response to James Lebovic's review of Why Intelligence Fails
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Intelligence and Strategic Surprises Revisited
Intelligence for Policymaking
From Prediction to Learning
Why Economic Sanctions Still Do Not Work
September 11 and the Adaptation Failure of U.S. Intelligence Agencies
Surprise and Change in International Politics
Surprise Attack
Intelligence and the problem of strategic surprise∗
Change and Continuity in the European Neighbourhood Policy
Early Warning and Response
Hindsight and Foresight
Analysis, War, and Decision
Bureaucratic Politics
An Improvised Patchwork
Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research
Blindsided? September 11 and the Origins of Strategic Surprise
Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between
The Yom Kippur War and the Inevitability of Surprise
From ‘Normal Incidents’ to Political Crises
Strategic Surprise and the September 11 Attacks
Success and Failure in Foreign Policy
Process Tracing and Historical Explanation
What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze
Intelligence Failure Retrained
The Idea and Practice of Conflict Prevention
The Intelligence of Stupidity
Peering into the Future
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |