Using a Paradox Approach to Explore Work–Nonwork Issues
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6436063 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sue A Epstein (0000-0002-6519-4470, SUNY Empire State College, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA), Sue R Faerman (University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York, USA) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 291-303 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0971-6858 • E-ISSN: 0973-0737 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/09716858251328813 |
| OpenAlex | W4409392798 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
The interface between work and nonwork domains is often presented as dilemmas, that is, ‘either/or’ decisions involving mutually exclusive choices where individuals must prioritize one option over the other. We propose a values-based paradox approach that conceptualizes work–nonwork issues through a ‘both/and’ lens, that is, a lens that allows individuals to see two seemingly opposing beliefs or approaches to both be true and beneficial. Focusing on the popular work-nonwork construct of work–nonwork conflict, we use a values-based paradox approach to explore the embedded work–nonwork tensions that have heretofore been approached with either/or thinking. An important benefit of this approach to work–nonwork issues is that it accommodates different situational contexts (e.g., different societal cultures) and thus provides an adaptable, inclusive approach to exploring work–nonwork issues. Our goal is to show how using a paradox approach can lead to a deeper understanding of underlying value dimensions, which allows individuals to frame and develop sustainable work-nonwork solutions. We conclude by discussing several benefits of a values-based paradox approach
Epistemology · Sociology · Work (physics · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Work-Family Balance Challenges
Unbending Gender
Toward a Theory of Paradox
Introduction to Special Topic Forum
Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox
A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations.
A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria
Added Benefits
Work and family satisfaction and conflict
The work-family interface around the world
Embracing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability
The constraints of a ‘work–life balance’ approach
Expanding the boundaries of work—family research
Values, Attitudes and the Behaviour Paradigm
Human Value-Oriented Management
Human Values in Management
Quality of Work Life and Work–Life Balance
Toward culture‐sensitive theories of the work–family interface
Paradoxical leadership in public sector organisations
Unpredictable Work Timing in Retail Jobs
Organizational Support Factors and Work-Family Outcomes
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |