Evaluating Military Use of Social Media for Political Branding during Online Firestorms
An Analysis of the Afghan Troops Withdrawal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6437744 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Temple Uwalaka (0000-0001-7930-4389, University of Canberra, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 199-215 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Political Marketing (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1537-7857 • E-ISSN: 1537-7865 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15377857.2023.2222683 |
| OpenAlex | W4380486332 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 58 |
This study investigates how the US and Australian Departments of Defence used social media platforms for branding, perception management and to curb online firestorms as well as how their citizens reacted to these political branding techniques during the Afghan troops' withdrawal and evacuations. The study analyzed 11,460 tweets and replies from the US and Australian DoDs. Results show that the US and Australian DoDs strategically used their tweets to communicate professionalism, military efficiency and exceptionalism, information and clarification, duty, commendation, commiseration, and support for mental health. Findings further demonstrate that there was a significant association between the US and Australian DoDs' counterinformation (inoculations) and tweets approving of both the withdrawal and evacuations. The study uncovers that the branding efforts of the US and Australian DoDs during the Afghan withdrawal and evacuations were successful as their high reservoir of trust moderated the short- and long-term effects of the online firestorm
Advertising · Afghan · Business · Duty · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social media · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
The third way
The Marketing of the President
Understanding online firestorms
‘Brussels will land on its feet like a cat’
Political Marketing
Consumer Democracy
Risk Society
Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality
Why Cryptocurrencies Want Privacy
Journalists’ Coverage of Online Firestorms in German-Language News Media
Discussing conflict in social media
Political Marketing and Lobbying
Introduction
The Nonlinear Effects of Political Advertising
Political Marketing and Propaganda
Political Marketing
The Wrath of Candidates. Drivers of Fear and Enthusiasm Appeals in Election Campaigns across the Globe
Political Marketing and Professionalized Campaigning
The Political Marketing of Broken Trust
Evolution of Political Branding
Toward a Conceptual Framework of Emotional Relationship Marketing
Quality Dimensions of Political Parties’ Website Services That Satisfy Voters in the Political Marketing
Political Marketing
Marketing Female Candidates as “Women”
Propaganda, PSYOP, and Political Marketing
The digital outcry
Nonprobability Sampling and Twitter
Nigerian Military Strategic Use of Social Media During Online Firestorms
The digital mundane
The Effectiveness of Supportive and Refutational Defenses in Immunizing and Restoring Beliefs Against Persuasion
Risk society
Tailored Messages in the Feed? Political Microtargeting on Facebook during the 2019 General Elections in Spain
Segmenting Voters by Motivation to Use Social Media and Their Lifestyle for Political Engagement
Political Leaders and Public Engagement
Governance in the Age of Digital Media and Branding
Introduction
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Analyzing the State of Digital Information Warfare Between India and Pakistan on Twittersphere
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |