Flagging as a silencing tool
Exploring the relationship between de-platforming of sex and online abuse on Instagram and TikTok
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6443512 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carolina Are (0000-0003-1110-3155, Northumbria University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 3577-3595 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Media & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614448241228544 |
| OpenAlex | W4391751785 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 34 |
This article investigates Instagram and TikTok’s approach to malicious flagging through users’ experience. Similar to liking, commenting and sharing, flagging is a reaction social media platforms allow users to highlight content that potentially violates community guidelines. However, flagging’s influence on moderation remains opaque: users who flag are largely unaware about the success of their reports; those who are de-platformed cannot be sure if or why their content has been reported, making them feel targeted not just by platforms’ processes, but by the retaliation of audiences themselves. Since the impact of de-platforming on users, and particularly on content creators who work through platforms, can be huge, this study provides scope to investigate flagging as an online abuse technique
Advertising · Business · Flagging · Internet privacy · Moderation · Scope (computer science · Social media · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · History · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
“It’s Vicious Out Here Just Keep Your Legs CLOSED”
Owning the narrative
The Emotional and Financial Impact of De-Platforming on Creators at the Margins
Digital determinants of sexual and reproductive health—workforce perspectives on digital and data literacies
Social Media's kangaroo court and censorship
Researching Under Platforms’ Gaze
Governing sexism on TikTok
‘Dysfunctional’ appeals and failures of algorithmic justice in Instagram and TikTok content moderation
Safety work repertoires and dating platforms
Women’s activism online in Italy
From Digital Health Literacy to a Digital and Data Capabilities Approach to Sexual Health
Resisting the Digital Deplatforming of Sex
Queer and trans influential peers
Unveiling the girl boss sexual contract
Algorithmic folk theories and peer review
Context matters
Post-social media
Content creators’ hopes and fears about artificial intelligence
Connective Democracy
The third way
Sex and Social Media
A Tale of Two Cultures
The Affordances of Social Media Platforms
Expanding the debate about content moderation
The assemblages of flagging and de-platforming against marginalised content creators
“Shadowbanning is not a thing”
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
‘Dude … stop the spread’
A corpo-civic space
Sex in the shadows of celebrity
Deplatforming sexual speech in the age of Fosta/Sesta
Erased
Algorithmic precarity in cultural work
The Shadowban Cycle
Media framing of trolling and online abuse
What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint
Censored, suspended, shadowbanned
Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip
The online survey as a qualitative research tool
The Affordances of Blogging
The shadow banning controversy
Platform governance at the margins
An autoethnography of automated powerlessness
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Risk society
The politics of 'platforms
Living in the world risk society
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |