Do You Know What Birth Control Actually Does to Your Body
Assessing Contraceptive Information on TikTok
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6444896 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Caroline De Moel‐mandel (0000-0001-8825-2824, La Trobe University), Arielle Donnelly (La Trobe University), Megan Bugden (0000-0001-7120-4877, La Trobe University) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 57 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 358-367 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1538-6341 • E-ISSN: 1931-2393 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/psrh.70025 |
| PMID | 40589123 |
| OpenAlex | W4411912430 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 45 |
Introduction Social media platforms have rapidly become key sources of contraceptive health information, shaping the beliefs and behaviors of individuals of reproductive age. Yet, it has become increasingly difficult to distinguish accurate content from misleading information, potentially leading to higher unintended pregnancy rates. Given the limited insights into the quality and reliability of contraceptive information on TikTok, this cross‐sectional study aimed to systematically evaluate popular TikTok content on contraception created by various users to identify and analyze misinformation. Method Between August and September 2023, we analyzed 100 videos from the top five hashtags related to contraception methods (#birthcontrol, #contraception, #thepill, #naturalbirthcontrol, and #cycletracking) to assess the characteristics of the health information presented and their quality, using the DISCERN tool. Results The TikTok videos collectively received 4.85 billion views. Only 10% were created by medical professionals. Overall, the content showed poor reliability and quality, indicating a prominent presence of contraceptive health misinformation. Furthermore, there was a concerning trend favoring natural contraceptive methods over hormonal options, often without appropriate risk disclosures, accompanied by a growing distrust in health professionals. Discussion The rise of contraceptive misinformation on social media is re‐shaping patient‐provider relationships and impacting contraceptive beliefs. TikTok offers an excellent public health opportunity to disseminate accurate contraceptive information accessible to all individuals, regardless of their background or resources. To address the observed distrust in health professionals, it is essential to improve contraceptive care quality and promote shared decision‐making, which would likely increase satisfaction with contraceptive choices and mitigate negative narratives online
Advertising · Business · Distrust · Environmental health · Family medicine · Family planning · Hormonal contraception · Internet privacy · Mass media · Misinformation · Political science · Population · Quality (philosophy · Reproductive health · Social media · Unintended pregnancy · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media in Health Education
Beyond the hashtag
Use of health information from social media and health self-efficacy
Quality and reliability of Chinese short videos on TikTok related to chronic renal failure
Lived experiences of contraceptive use prior to unexpected pregnancy
Contraceptive autonomy of adolescents and young adults in the U.S. South
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media
The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies
Covid-19 on TikTok
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili
TikTok and public health
What Do Social Media Influencers Say About Birth Control? A Content Analysis of YouTube Vlogs About Birth Control
Adolescents’ Use of the Internet for Sex Education
How Health Communication via Tik Tok Makes a Difference
Reasons for rejecting hormonal contraception in Western countries
Discern
Interrogating the pill
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |