Cross‐sectoral collaboration in times of crisis
Comparing the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6446561 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michal Plaček (0000-0002-4746-0763, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University Prague Czech Republic, autor de correspondencia), Vladislav Valentinov (0000-0002-4247-0364, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies Halle Germany), Gabriela Daniel (Ambis College Prague Czech Republic), František Ochrana (0000-0001-6454-5198, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University Prague Czech Republic), Paweł Mikołajczak (0000-0003-2704-5025, Poznań University of Economics and Business Poznań Poland), Anna Waligóra (0000-0002-5543-7010, Poznań University of Economics and Business Poznań Poland) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 103 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 828-854 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-07-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0033-3298 • E-ISSN: 1467-9299 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/padm.13016 |
| OpenAlex | W4400839012 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 41 |
The Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland, with their shared political histories, have confronted the compounded challenges of the COVID‐19 pandemic and the Ukraine war. These difficulties spurred the emergence of public–nonprofit collaboration in all three countries, each taking distinct paths. Our study aims to unravel these divergent trajectories of public–nonprofit collaboration through the lens of historical institutionalism. Using this lens, we attribute this divergence to the influence of the broader institutional environment, whose evolution has followed distinct trajectories in the examined countries. To achieve our objectives, we employed single‐country case study methods, leveraging desk research and structured interviews with management informants from nonprofit organizations in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland (37 respondents in total). Our study demonstrates that the perceptions of the institutional environment by nonprofit actors directly shape the effectiveness of collaborations between the public sector and nonprofit organizations. Contrary to Western expectations, our findings challenge the seemingly prevailing optimism regarding the outcomes of public–nonprofit collaboration and emphasize the influence of factors such as path dependency, mutual distrust, and prior negative experiences
Business · Czech · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Public procurement scandals and trust in government during Covid-19
What Works for Whom? Exploring the Determinants and Hierarchical Tensions of Public Network Effectiveness
Governance and Accountability in Reshaping Public Services
Can Cross‐Sector Collaboration Contribute to Boundaries Reshaping of Digital Government Platforms? Empirical Evidence Based on Machine Learning and Text Analysis
The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions
Politics in Time
How Institutions Evolve
Small, Slow, and Gradual Reform
Historical institutionalism in comparative politics
Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies
Explaining Institutional Change
The evolutionary trajectory of social enterprises in the Czech Republic and Slovakia
The Nonprofit sector
Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries
The Relationship between Government and Civil Society in the Era of Covid-19
Historical institutionalism
Rethinking Nonprofit Commercialization
Does Service Category Matter for Cross-Sectoral Collaboration
Global Civil Society Response to the Covid-19 Crisis
Poland
Crisis? What crisis? Social policy when crises are and are not crises in Czechia, Hungary and Slovakia
Designing and Implementing Cross‐Sector Collaborations
Accountability in Governance Networks
The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations
Public administration and politics meet turbulence
Emergency management through enduring collaborative networks
Buying green in U.S. local government
Covid ‐19‐induced governance transformation
Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations
Caught in a standstill—The unresolved challenges of integrated service delivery in public organizations
Your Competitive Side Is Calling
The Power of Nonprofits
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Does Cross-Sectoral Partnership Deliver? An Empirical Exploration of Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity
Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics
Alternative Models of Government-Nonprofit Sector Relations
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |