The return of the researcher
The Methodological Challenges of a Follow-Up Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6447000 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patrice Cooper (0000-0001-5418-1060, University College Cork), Sean Tanner (0000-0003-4191-1065, University College Cork), Helen Mcgrath (0000-0003-3613-1638, University College Cork) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1746-5648 • E-ISSN: 1746-5656 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/qrom-01-2025-2908 |
| OpenAlex | W4410284201 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 55 |
Purpose The aim of this paper is to advance understanding of the methodological challenges involved in conducting a “follow-up” study. This article provides reflections on the reality of conducting such studies, documenting the researcher’s personal experiences and reflections on returning to interview the same sample of leaders over a 24-year period. Design/methodology/approach The empirical foundation is based on the lead author’s personal experience of conducting interviews with the same sample of leaders in 1997, 2007 and 2021 using a phenomenological, qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews. A temporal analysis was conducted (as past, present and future perspectives changed across waves), which required careful chronological mapping of events and changes for each participant over the 24 years. Findings The study reveals key challenges that are amplified in follow-up research compared to standard longitudinal designs. These include maintaining consistency while adapting to changed contexts, managing complex, temporally layered data and navigating evolved researcher–participant relationships. The findings are synthesised into the 4C Framework of follow-up inquiry: consistency, contextualisation, complexity and connectivity. Originality/value While guidelines exist for conducting longitudinal qualitative research, reflexive accounts documenting the lived experience of follow-up studies are rare. This paper provides an honest account of the unique challenges researchers face when returning to study the same participants after an extended interval. The resulting 4C Framework offers practical guidance to researchers and represents the main contribution of this study
Media studies · Social science · Sociology · Data Analysis and Archiving · Gender Studies · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Essentials of narrative analysis.
Understanding Emotion at Work
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Field Research on Change
Entrepreneurial learning from failure
The qualitative research audit trail
Does the vision fit? How change context construal and followers’ regulatory focus influence responses to leader change visions
Leader development across the lifespan
Advancing the science of 21st-century leadership development
Longitudinal studies of leadership development
Writing Qualitatively
Handbook of the Life Course
Researching Life Stories and Family Histories
Stories from the lived and living fieldwork process
Thick performances, not just thick descriptions
Untold stories of the field and beyond
The Narrative Correspondence Method
Longitudinal qualitative research and interpretative phenomenological analysis
Exploring rigour in autoethnographic research
Hindsight, foresight and insight
Project 4
The Future of Autobiography Studies
Naturalistic inquiry
Going back
The critical incident technique
"Outing" the Researcher
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
Ethnographic Returning, Qualitative Longitudinal Research and the Reflexive Analysis of Social Practice
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |