Democratic Strategic Litigation and Defence of ‘LGBTI+’ Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6448320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benjamin Moron-Puech (0000-0001-7254-1031), Marion Kim-Chi Pollaert (0000-0002-4541-4296), Jimmy Kolbe-André, Julien Béal-Long |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 83-103 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Redescriptions Political Thought Conceptual History and Feminist Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2308-0906 • E-ISSN: 2308-0914 |
| Publisher | Helsinki University Press (PUBLISHER • FI) |
| DOI | 10.33134/rds.445 |
| OpenAlex | W4412011437 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
This paper is a contribution to strategic litigation studies, with most of its materials drawn from the field of ‘LGBTI+’ rights, i.e., issues related to sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics (SOGIESC). After recalling briefly the history of strategic litigation, this paper reflects on the link between strategic litigation and democracy, by attempting to identify, among the various forms of strategic litigation those who clearly contributes to democracy and which should therefore benefit from provisions facilitating it, such as rules broadening the standing required to initiate a lawsuit or rules favoring its funding. This paper also demonstrates the legitimacy of the contribution of supreme courts to democratic regimes, as long as such courts are cautious of preserving the powers of the other bodies representing the people (mostly Parliament and Government), by making sure that judges’ intervention is compensating for the flaws of democracy and or not a ‘government of judges’. By comparing the process of adoption of judgments and acts of Parliament, the paper also shows the democratic merits of the judicial deliberation compared to the parliament’s one. The paper, therefore, defends the idea that Strategic litigation can be a better tool than other innovative tools usually promoted to remedy the crisis of democracy, especially for marginalized groups
Democracy · Human rights · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Law · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma
Legal Gap
Le pouvoir exécutif et la judiciarisation de la politique au Canada. Une étude du Programme de contestation judiciaire
Distract and Divert
State capture and development
Advocating for the Right
Political Deliberation & the Adversarial Principle
Anti-discrimination policy actors and their use of litigation strategies
Interest Group Litigation and the Embedded State
Contribution à une sociologie politique des entrepreneurs internationaux de transferts de réformes judiciaires
Minoritaires et citoyens ? Faites vos preuves
La démocratie doit-elle être délibérative
The Representation of Interests in British Government
Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |