Detecting pro-kremlin disinformation using large language models
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6448535 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marianne Kramer (University of Copenhagen), Yevgeniy Golovchenko (0000-0003-3292-7372, University of Copenhagen), Frederik Hjorth (0000-0003-4063-4983, University of Copenhagen) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Research & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-1680 • E-ISSN: 2053-1680 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20531680251351910 |
| OpenAlex | W4411580328 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
A growing body of literature examines manipulative information by detecting political mis-/disinformation in text data. This line of research typically involves highly costly manual annotation of text for manual content analysis, and/or training and validating automated downstream approaches. We examine whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can detect pro-Kremlin disinformation about the war in Ukraine, focusing on the case of the downing of the civilian flight MH17. We benchmark methods using a large set of tweets labeled by expert annotators. We show that both open and closed LLMs can accurately detect pro-Kremlin disinformation tweets, outperforming both a research assistant and supervised models used in earlier research and at drastically lower cost compared to either research assistants or crowd workers. Our findings contribute to the literature on mis/-disinformation by showcasing how LLMs can substantially lower the costs of detection even when the labeling requires complex, context-specific knowledge about a given case
Disinformation · Fake news · Internet privacy · Political science · Social media · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Misinformation and Its Impacts
ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks
Ideological Asymmetry in the Reach of Pro-Russian Digital Disinformation to United States Audiences
What Is Disinformation
The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis
Political Fact-Checking on Twitter
Less Annotating, More Classifying
State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine
Crowd-sourced Text Analysis
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |