State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine
Citizen Curators of Digital Disinformation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5148902 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yevgeniy Golovchenko (0000-0003-3292-7372, Department of Social Sciences), Mareike Hartmann (0000-0001-7586-1639, Department of Social Sciences), Rebecca Adler-Nissen (0000-0001-7924-9957, Department of Social Sciences) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 975-994 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiy148 |
| OpenAlex | W2890316337 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 59 |
| References cited | 3 |
This article explores the dynamics of digital (dis)information in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. International Relations scholars have presented the online debate in terms of ‘information warfare’—that is, a number of strategic campaigns to win over local and global public opinion, largely orchestrated by the Kremlin and pro-western authorities. However, this way of describing the online debate reduces civil society to a mere target for manipulation. This article presents a different understanding of the debate. By examining the social media engagement generated by one of the conflict's most important events—the downing of the Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) over Ukraine—we explore how competing claims about the cause of the plane crash are disseminated by the state, media and civil society. By analysing approximately 950,000 tweets, the article demonstrates how individual citizens are more than purveyors of government messages; they are the most active drivers of both disinformation and attempts to counter such information. These citizen curators actively shape competing narratives about why MH17 crashed and citizens, as a group, are four times more likely to be retweeted than any other type of user. Our findings challenge conceptualizations of a state-orchestrated information war over Ukraine, and point to the importance of citizen activity in the struggle over truths during international conflicts.
Civil society · Digital media · Disinformation · Information Warfare · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Social media · Sociology · State (computer science) · Computer Science · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics
Navigating contested epistemic fields of resource extraction
Comparative analysis of the information security environment in Ukraine and Poland (survey of journalists and editors)
Kremlin "vapaan sanan" saattajat? Suomalaiset verkkomediat kansainvälisen uutisvirran portilla
Introduction
Forum Global Dis
Liar's war
La ciberguerra entre Rusia y Ucrania. Concienciación y protestas a través del videojuego y el metaverso
Handbook of Media and Communication Governance
The Platformisation of Consumer Culture
Creating Chaos Online
Practice Approaches to the Digital Transformations of Diplomacy
When Stigmatization Fails
Digital propaganda is not simply propaganda in digital garb
How China's Cognitive Warfare Works
Measuring the scope of pro-Kremlin disinformation on Twitter
Ensuring information security
The right to access official information as a resilience-improving tool
Sosyal Medyada Dijital Dezenformasyon
Soluciones locales para problemas globales
The use of artificial intelligence in counter-disinformation
Advantages of the connective strategic narrative during the Russian–Ukrainian war
The Role of Civil Society in Countering Disinformation
Unraveling Disinformation
Cross-Platform State Propaganda
Azovsteel
Uncertain, malevolent and irrational
Cartooning, framing, and virality
A conceptual critique of remote warfare
Percepciones sobre medios de comunicación y desinformación
Theorising digital disinformation in international relations
Russian, US and Chinese Revisionism
Disinformation, performed
The paperboys of Russian messaging
Post-Soviet migrants in Germany, transnational public spheres and Russian soft power
Detecting pro-kremlin disinformation using large language models
Digitally witnessable war from pereklychka to propaganda
Mapping research on disinformation and misinformation across the Nordic countries
Mass attitudes towards Russia’s aggression against Ukraine
Citizen curation and the online communication of folk economics
How should platforms be archived? On sustainable use practices of a Telegram Archive to study Russia’s war against Ukraine
Does social media undermine trust? Institutional trust in civil society and governance institutions
Unpacking state-sponsored cyber conflict
Building Resilience Against Hostile Information Influence Activities
Struggles for Recognition
Uncovering the uncoverers
Social Media Warfare
Social media as a behavior depolarizer
Troll Factories
The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order
Countering Violent Extremism and Radical Rhetoric
Trolls, bots and everyone else
Civil society and external actors
The good, the bad, and the ugly
Subversion, cyber operations, and reverse structural power in world politics
Geopolitical fault-line cities in the world of divided cities
War or peace tweets? The case of Pakistan
The Global Authoritarian Turn, Democratic Vulnerability, and Geo-digital Competition
For Whom the Bot Tolls
Analyzing the State of Digital Information Warfare Between India and Pakistan on Twittersphere
| Unique citing works | 59 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 52 |