Building ethical awareness to strengthen co-production for transformation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6454545 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stefan Partelow (0000-0002-7751-4005, Life & Brain (Germany)), Christopher Luederitz (0000-0002-7873-4229, McGill University), Ying-Syuan Huang (0000-0003-0148-6260, McGill University), Henrik Von Wehrden (0000-0003-2087-5552, Leuphana University of Lüneburg), Christiane Woopen (0000-0002-7148-6808, Life & Brain (Germany)) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 307-314 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainability Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1862-4057 • E-ISSN: 1862-4065 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11625-024-01582-7 |
| OpenAlex | W4404215833 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 38 |
Awareness of different ethical theories can support transformation-oriented researchers in navigating value-based decisions in co-production. We synthesize and explicitly link the literature on co-production and ethical theories in philosophy to initiate this awareness. Four key decision points in co-production projects are outlined that require value-based actions: (1) what to focus on, (2) who to include, (3) how to co-create and (4) how to continue. To discuss how project actions can be examined from different ethical perspectives, we synthesize the claims of four ethical theories and discuss them in the context of co-production project choices. The four ethical theories are: deontological ethics, utilitarianism, contractualism and virtue ethics. Overall, we argue for embracing pluralistic ethical perspectives when navigating decisions in co-production projects
Biology · Business · Economics · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Landscape ecology · Political science · Production (economics · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Transformation (genetics · Engineering · Environmental Science · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Law · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Ecology
Best bang for your buck
Reimagining Research Ethics for the Participatory and Transformative Turn
A method to identify positive tipping points to accelerate low-carbon transitions and actions to trigger them
Principles for ethical boundary spanning between science, policy and practice
How can we better account for experiential knowledge in co-production frameworks
Immanuel Kant
Co-Producing Sustainability
Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives
Neither right nor wrong? Ethics of collaboration in transformative research for sustainable futures
Guiding principles for transdisciplinary sustainability research and practice
Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes
On what matters, Volume one
Six modes of co-production for sustainability
Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science
Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
To co-produce or not to co-produce
Making room and moving over
The politics of co-production
Building knowledge infrastructure for diverse stakeholders to scale up co-production equitably
Great expectations? Reconciling the aspiration, outcome, and possibility of co-production
Non-monetary narratives motivate businesses to engage with climate change
Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science
Values in transformational sustainability science
What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives
Reflexive Methodological Pluralism
Co-production in global sustainability
Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty
Parsing “Participation” in Action Research
Development geography I
Beyond “linking knowledge and action”
Leverage points for sustainability transformation
Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science
A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research
Transdisciplinary co-production
Transition versus transformation
An agenda for sustainability transitions research
Disaster impacts, resilience, and sustainability opportunities for Gili Trawangan, Indonesia
Path dependence in historical sociology
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |