An interdisciplinary perspective on AI-supported decision making in medicine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6456257 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonas Ammeling (0000-0002-0335-1194), Marc Aubreville (0000-0002-5294-5247), Alexis Fritz (0009-0008-2191-8722), Angelika Kießig (0009-0004-1238-327X), Sebastian Krügel (0000-0003-1196-8220), Matthias Uhl (0000-0002-8838-4824) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 81 |
| Pages | 102791-102791 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technology in Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102791 |
| OpenAlex | W4405035317 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 87 |
Artificial intelligence (AI)-supported medical diagnosis offers the potential to utilize the collaborative intelligence of context-sensitive humans and narrowly focused machines for patients’ benefit. The employment of machine-learning-based decision-support systems (MLDSS) in medicine, however, raises important multidisciplinary challenges that cannot be addressed in isolation. We discuss three disciplinary perspectives on the topic and their interplay. Ethical issues arise at the level of changing responsibility structures in healthcare. Behavioral issues relate to the actual impact that the system has on physicians. Technical issues arise with respect to the training of a machine learning (ML) model that gives accurate advice. We argue that the interaction between physicians and MLDSS including the concrete design of the interface in which this interaction occurs can only be considered at the intersection of all three disciplines
Clinical decision making · Engineering ethics · Family medicine · Knowledge management · Management science · Medical decision making · Perspective (graphical · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI · Medicine · Artificial Intelligence
Advice taking and decision-making
The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy
Explanation in artificial intelligence
Overcoming Algorithm Aversion
Can we open the black box of AI?
Peeking Inside the Black-Box
Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion
Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
The responsibility gap
Trust in Artificial Intelligence
Machine behaviour
Automation bias
Receiving other people’s advice
Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability
Algorithm appreciation
The Deception of Certainty
The Future Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Who needs explanation and when? Juggling explainable AI and user epistemic uncertainty
A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making
Algorithms as partners in crime
Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic
Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement
Responsibility beyond design
Machine learning in healthcare and the methodological priority of epistemology over ethics
Confidence, advice seeking and changes of mind in decision making
Social Influence Under Uncertainty in Interaction with Peers, Robots and Computers
Perceived responsibility in AI-supported medicine
Narrative responsibility and artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence and Black‐Box Medical Decisions
When Doctors and AI Interact
Zombies in the Loop? Humans Trust Untrustworthy AI-Advisors for Ethical Decisions
From Responsibility to Reason-Giving Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence
Strategies for integrating disparate social information
Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box
Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis
Exploiting the Wisdom of Others to Make Better Decisions
Manipulation and Teaching
Varieties of responsibility
(Online) manipulation
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |