Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An interdisciplinary perspective on AI-supported decision making in medicine

Bibliographic Data

ID6456257
AuthorsJonas Ammeling (0000-0002-0335-1194), Marc Aubreville (0000-0002-5294-5247), Alexis Fritz (0009-0008-2191-8722), Angelika Kießig (0009-0004-1238-327X), Sebastian Krügel (0000-0003-1196-8220), Matthias Uhl (0000-0002-8838-4824)
Year2024
Volume81
Pages102791-102791
Publication date2024-12-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnology in Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102791
OpenAlexW4405035317
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited87

Artificial intelligence (AI)-supported medical diagnosis offers the potential to utilize the collaborative intelligence of context-sensitive humans and narrowly focused machines for patients’ benefit. The employment of machine-learning-based decision-support systems (MLDSS) in medicine, however, raises important multidisciplinary challenges that cannot be addressed in isolation. We discuss three disciplinary perspectives on the topic and their interplay. Ethical issues arise at the level of changing responsibility structures in healthcare. Behavioral issues relate to the actual impact that the system has on physicians. Technical issues arise with respect to the training of a machine learning (ML) model that gives accurate advice. We argue that the interaction between physicians and MLDSS including the concrete design of the interface in which this interaction occurs can only be considered at the intersection of all three disciplines

Clinical decision making · Engineering ethics · Family medicine · Knowledge management · Management science · Medical decision making · Perspective (graphical · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI · Medicine · Artificial Intelligence

  • Non-hierarchic leadership collaboration

    Open Access•Basilio Ruiz De Apodaca Oihana, Vicente J Montes Gan et al.•Technology in Society•2025

  • Images of AI

    Open Access•Simone V Spiegler, Simone Spiegler et al.•Technology in Society•2025

  • Advice taking and decision-making

    Open Access•Silvia Bonaccio, Reeshad S Dalal•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2006

  • The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy

    Open Access•Kelly E See, Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2011

  • Explanation in artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Tim Miller•Artificial Intelligence•2019

  • Overcoming Algorithm Aversion

    Open Access•Berkeley J Dietvorst, Joseph P Simmons et al.•Management Science•2018

  • Can we open the black box of AI?

    Open Access•Davide Castelvecchi•Nature•2016

  • Peeking Inside the Black-Box

    Open Access•Amina Adadi, Mohammed Berrada•IEEE Access•2018

  • Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion

    Open Access•Noah Castelo, Maarten W Bos et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2019

  • Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Colm J Kelly, Alan Karthikesalingam et al.•BMC Medicine•2019

  • The responsibility gap

    Open Access•Andreas Matthias•Ethics and Information Technology•2004

  • Trust in Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Alexandra D Kaplan, Loyola de Palacio del Valle Lersundi et al.•Human Factors: The Journal of the…•2023

  • Machine behaviour

    Open Access•Iyad Rahwan, Manuel Cebrian et al.•Nature•2019

  • Automation bias

    Kate Goddard, Abdul Roudsari et al.•Journal of the American Medical…•2012

  • Receiving other people’s advice

    Open Access•Ilan Yaniv•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2004

  • Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability

    Open Access•Mark Coeckelbergh•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

  • Algorithm appreciation

    Open Access•Jennifer M Logg, Julia A Minson et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2019

  • The Deception of Certainty

    Open Access•Florian Funer•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2022

  • The Future Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

    Open Access•Torbjørn Gundersen, Kristine Bærøe•Science and Engineering Ethics•2022

  • Who needs explanation and when? Juggling explainable AI and user epistemic uncertainty

    Open Access•Jinglu Jiang, Surinder Kahai et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making

    Open Access•Phoebe E Bailey, Tarren Leon et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Algorithms as partners in crime

    Open Access•Sebastian Krügel, Andreas Ostermaier et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic

    Open Access•Matthias Braun, Patrik Hummel et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  • Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement

    Hendrik Kempt, Saskia K Nagel•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Responsibility beyond design

    Open Access•Mary Sand, Juan M Durán et al.•Bioethics•2022

  • Machine learning in healthcare and the methodological priority of epistemology over ethics

    Thomas Grote•Inquiry•2025

  • Confidence, advice seeking and changes of mind in decision making

    Open Access•Niccolo Pescetelli, Anna-Katharina Hauperich et al.•Cognition•2021

  • Social Influence Under Uncertainty in Interaction with Peers, Robots and Computers

    Open Access•Joshua Zonca, Anna Folsø et al.•International Journal of Social…•2023

  • Perceived responsibility in AI-supported medicine

    Open Access•Sebastian Krügel, Jonas Ammeling et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • Narrative responsibility and artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Mark Coeckelbergh•AI & Society•2023

  • Artificial Intelligence and Black‐Box Medical Decisions

    Open Access•Alex John London•The Hastings Center Report•2019

  • When Doctors and AI Interact

    Open Access•Mario Verdicchio, Andrea Perin•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • Zombies in the Loop? Humans Trust Untrustworthy AI-Advisors for Ethical Decisions

    Open Access•Sebastian Krügel, Andreas Ostermaier et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • From Responsibility to Reason-Giving Explainable Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Kevin Baum, Susanne Mantel et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making

    Open Access•Jens Christian Bjerring, Jacob Busch•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Filippo Santoni de Sio, Giulio Mecacci•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • Strategies for integrating disparate social information

    Lucas Molleman, Alan Novaes Tump et al.•2020

  • Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box

    Open Access•Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2017

  • Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis

    Open Access•Derek J Koehler, T Alexandra Beauregard•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2006

  • Exploiting the Wisdom of Others to Make Better Decisions

    Open Access•Ilan Yaniv, Shoham Choshen-Hillel et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2011

  • Manipulation and Teaching

    Open Access•Vance Kasten•Journal of Philosophy of Education•1980

  • Varieties of responsibility

    Open Access•I Van De Poel, Mary Sand•Synthese•2021

  • (Online) manipulation

    Open Access•Michael Klenk•Review of Social Economy•2022

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae