Socio-ecological resilience and technology-driven value creation for humanitarian emergencies. An exploratory case study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6456306 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria Vincenza Ciasullo (0000-0003-2052-551X, University of Salerno), Silvia Cosimato (0000-0003-4243-8177, Federico II University Hospital), Fausta Schiavone (0000-0001-9219-6714, Parthenope University of Naples, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Pages | 103111-103111 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technology in Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103111 |
| OpenAlex | W4415185979 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 71 |
The purpose of this paper is to explore, assuming the service ecosystem perspective, the humanitarian domain, and the multi-level dynamics that ensure service continuity even in emergencies. In doing so, the enhancing role of digital technologies has been investigated, pointing out the way they support actors in enacting specific practices able to make a humanitarian service ecosystem (HSE) resilient over time. The study was based on an exploratory qualitative analysis, conducted by administering some semi-structured interviews to humanitarian service ecosystem key informants. Results were analyzed and presented by implementing an interpretative data analysis process. An HSE was conceptualized by grasping its main characteristics, also pointing out the role that digital technologies play in ensuring service continuity and the main mechanisms that make it resilient and, therefore, able to function and evolve by creating new and renovated value. The research theoretically contributes to the nascent literature on the humanitarian service ecosystem, offering a new understanding of the role that socio-technical actors can have in ensuring the continuity of humanitarian service in emergency contexts. Particularly, the study advances the literature on service ecosystems in the humanitarian domain, providing a multilevel framework that explains the mechanisms linking humanitarian ecosystem emergency management to resilient outcomes. Practically, the study offers interesting insights for humanitarian organizations, policymakers, and technology developers seeking to enhance preparedness and response strategies by leveraging digital innovations.
Crowdsourcing · Digital ecosystem · Emergency management · Exploratory research · Humanitarian aid · Preparedness · Resilience (materials science) · Service (business) · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Urban Planning and Valuation
What is Qualitative Interviewing?
Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation
Sociomaterial Practices
What is ‘social resilience’? Perspectives of disaster researchers, emergency management practitioners, and policymakers in New Zealand
The Reification of Absorptive Capacity
Implementing a Digital Strategy
Institutions and axioms
An inclusive and adaptive framework for measuring social resilience to disasters
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Integrating research evidence in humanitarian health responses
Resilience in public service partnerships
Digital business models and ridesharing for value co-creation in healthcare
Qualitative Research Interviewing
Designing Case Studies
Qualitative Interviewing
Choose Your Method
Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment
Resilience capabilities of healthcare supply chain and supportive digital technologies
Naturalistic inquiry
Research methodology
Measuring the dimensions of adaptive capacity
The Future of the Commons
Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research
Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science
The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis
Anonymising interview data
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |