It's the judicial equivalent of robbing Peter to pay Paul’—The implementation gap in section 28 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6456904 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vanessa E Munro (0000-0002-2552-9651, University of Warwick), Ve Munro (University of Warwick, corresponding author), Siobhan Weare (0000-0001-9298-0883, Lancaster University), Lorna O’doherty (0000-0003-0816-9321, Coventry University), G Carter (0000-0001-7244-037X, Coventry University), Lara Flynn Hudspith (0000-0001-6044-0700, Lancaster University), L Hudspith (Lancaster University), Emma Sleath (0000-0002-3333-5742, University of Leicester), Sarah Brown (0000-0001-7699-4417), Sarah J Brown (0000-0002-5859-4214, University of the Sunshine Coast), Michelle Cutland (0000-0002-8644-7051, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust), Concetta Perôt (0000-0001-8967-3954) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 117-139 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Evidence & Proof (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1365-7127 • E-ISSN: 1740-5572 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/13657127241259800 |
| OpenAlex | W4399618585 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 8 |
Section 28, the last of the special measures under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to be implemented, was rolled out across England and Wales between 2020 and 2022. This allows vulnerable and/or intimidated witnesses and complainants, who have first pre-recorded their evidence-in-chief through a police video-recorded interview, to pre-record their cross-examination, which is then presented to the court during the substantive trial. This article critically explores s. 28 by drawing upon qualitative data from 108 semi-structured interviews conducted with participants across seven stakeholder groups, including criminal justice practitioners, and complainants and their families in sexual offences cases. Through a critical consideration of the articulated benefits associated with s. 28 within the context of sexual offences cases, we argue that there continue to be substantial challenges associated with its implementation that reduce its prospects for success, and which need to be addressed as a priority
Business · Context (archaeology · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Poison control · Political science · Section (typography · Sexual assault · Sociology · Stakeholder · Suicide prevention · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · History · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |