Securities against misrule
Juries, Assemblies, Elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6573650 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jon Elster (0000-0002-9543-1780) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Pages | 324 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Securities against misrule (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9781139382762 |
| ISBN | 9781139382762 |
| Open Library | OL25361514M |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 47 |
This book proposes a normative theory of collective decision making, inspired by Jeremy Bentham but not including his utilitarian philosophy. The central proposal is that in designing democratic institutions one should reduce as much as possible the impact of self-interest, passion, prejudice, and bias on the decision makers, and then let the chips fall where they may. There is no independently defined good outcome that institutions can track, nor is there any way of reliably selecting good decision makers. In addition to a long initial chapter that surveys theories of collective decision making, notably social-choice theory, and a chapter expounding and discussing Bentham,Ŵs views, historical chapters on the jury, constituent assemblies, and electoral systems develop and illustrate the main ideas. This work draws on a welter of case studies and historical episodes, from Thucydides and Plutarch to the present. It is also grounded in psychology, behavioral economics, and law
Abuse of administrative power · Decision-making · Group Decision Making · History & Theory · Political science · Prevention · Representative government and representation · Administrative discretion · Decision making · Group decision making · Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)
Words on Fire
Elster, Jon (1940–)
A Treatise on Northern Ireland, Volume II
Taking Utilitarianism Seriously
Permanent Disenfranchisement and Democratic Inclusion
Citizens against Austerity
Le tirage au sort au XXI e siècle. Actualité de l’expérimentation démocratique
La nature du vote oral. Leçons d’une étude de cas
Whose Right to Vote? The Right to Vote Analyzed in Relation to Principles of Electoral Inclusion
Algorithmic Fairness and the Situated Dynamics of Justice
Elite Fractures, Public Capture
The scarred original position
Power-Sharing Executives
Compared to What? Judicial Review and Other Veto Points in Contemporary Democratic Theory
Silence and democratic institutional design
The choice of efficiencies and the necessity of politics
Capable deliberators
Transparency
The Social Ontology of Deliberating Bodies
The Rule of Non‐Opposition
The legitimacy of free trade agreements as tools of EU democracy promotion
Institutionalised distrust and human oversight of artificial intelligence
Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes
Democratizing Expertise
Between cynicism and idiocy
Foreign Influence and the Legitimacy of Constitution Building in South Sudan
Anonymity, Pseudonymity, and Deliberation
Representative, deputy, or delegate? Jeremy Bentham’s theory of representative democracy
Some notes on ‘Populism’
Lecciones de los griegos
Emotions in Constitution‐making
In defense of knavish constitutions
On the People's Terms
The epistemic quality of expert bodies
Sortition and cognitive ability
Disentangling Referendums and Direct Democracy
What’s wrong with an epistocratic council
Combining Citizen Participation and Expert Analysis
Epistemic democracy and the role of experts
Voting secrecy and the right to justification
La délibération démocratique à l'Assemblée athénienne
Constitutional Origins and Liberal Democracy
Moderation as Government
Majority Rule
Secrecy and transparency in political philosophy
Vigilance and Confidence
L'autonomie de la recherche scientifique en débats
| Citations per year | 3.92 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |