Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Securities against misrule

Juries, Assemblies, Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID6573650
AuthorsJon Elster (0000-0002-9543-1780)
Year2013
Pages324
Publication date2013-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueSecurities against misrule (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9781139382762
ISBN9781139382762
Open LibraryOL25361514M
LanguageEN
Citations received47

This book proposes a normative theory of collective decision making, inspired by Jeremy Bentham but not including his utilitarian philosophy. The central proposal is that in designing democratic institutions one should reduce as much as possible the impact of self-interest, passion, prejudice, and bias on the decision makers, and then let the chips fall where they may. There is no independently defined good outcome that institutions can track, nor is there any way of reliably selecting good decision makers. In addition to a long initial chapter that surveys theories of collective decision making, notably social-choice theory, and a chapter expounding and discussing Bentham,Ŵs views, historical chapters on the jury, constituent assemblies, and electoral systems develop and illustrate the main ideas. This work draws on a welter of case studies and historical episodes, from Thucydides and Plutarch to the present. It is also grounded in psychology, behavioral economics, and law

Abuse of administrative power · Decision-making · Group Decision Making · History & Theory · Political science · Prevention · Representative government and representation · Administrative discretion · Decision making · Group decision making · Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)

  • Words on Fire

    Rob Goodman•Words on Fire•2021

  • Elster, Jon (1940–)

    Open Access•Charles Crothers, Charles H G Crothers•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • A Treatise on Northern Ireland, Volume II

    Brendan O’leary, Brendan O'Leary•Treatise on Northern Ireland,…•2019

  • Taking Utilitarianism Seriously

    Christopher Woodard•Taking Utilitarianism Seriously•2019

  • Permanent Disenfranchisement and Democratic Inclusion

    Open Access•Eleonora D’annibale•Democratic Theory•2025

  • Citizens against Austerity

    Open Access•Ordóñez, V Ordóñez et al.•Araucaria•2015

  • Le tirage au sort au XXI e siècle. Actualité de l’expérimentation démocratique

    Dimitri Courant, Yves Sintomer•Participations•2019

  • La nature du vote oral. Leçons d’une étude de cas

    Philippe Urfalino•Négociations•2017

  • Whose Right to Vote? The Right to Vote Analyzed in Relation to Principles of Electoral Inclusion

    Open Access•Eleonora D’annibale, Eleonora D'Annibale•The Journal of Ethics•2025

  • Algorithmic Fairness and the Situated Dynamics of Justice

    Open Access•Sina Fazelpour, Zachary C Lipton et al.•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Elite Fractures, Public Capture

    Open Access•Matthew Martins•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • The scarred original position

    Open Access•Francisco Batista•Journal of International…•2026

  • Power-Sharing Executives

    John Mcgarry, Brian O’leary•Ethnopolitics•2015

  • Compared to What? Judicial Review and Other Veto Points in Contemporary Democratic Theory

    Open Access•David Watkins, Scott E Lemieux•Perspectives on Politics•2015

  • Silence and democratic institutional design

    Sean W D Gray, Sean Wd Gray•Critical Review of International…•2020

  • The choice of efficiencies and the necessity of politics

    Open Access•Michael Bennett•Critical Review of International…•2020

  • Capable deliberators

    Open Access•Thomas Schramme•Critical Review of International…•2021

  • Transparency

    Sandrine Baume, Yannis Papadopoulos•Critical Review of International…•2015

  • The Social Ontology of Deliberating Bodies

    Open Access•Philippe Urfalino•Journal of Political Philosophy•2017

  • The Rule of Non‐Opposition

    Open Access•Philippe Urfalino•Journal of Political Philosophy•2014

  • The legitimacy of free trade agreements as tools of EU democracy promotion

    Tom Theuns•Cambridge Review of International…•2019

  • Institutionalised distrust and human oversight of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Johann Laux•AI & Society•2024

  • Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes

    Open Access•Gabriel L Negretto•Redrafting Constitutions in…•2020

  • Democratizing Expertise

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst•Social Epistemology•2025

  • Between cynicism and idiocy

    Open Access•Thomas Osborne•European Journal of Cultural and…•2014

  • Foreign Influence and the Legitimacy of Constitution Building in South Sudan

    Open Access•Joseph Geng Akech•Journal of African Law•2023

  • Anonymity, Pseudonymity, and Deliberation

    Open Access•Alfred Moore•Journal of Political Philosophy•2018

  • Representative, deputy, or delegate? Jeremy Bentham’s theory of representative democracy

    Open Access•James Vitali•History of European Ideas•2021

  • Some notes on ‘Populism’

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2020

  • Lecciones de los griegos

    Open Access•Juan Gabriel Gómez Albarello•Análisis Político•2024

  • Emotions in Constitution‐making

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Scandinavian Political Studies•2017

  • In defense of knavish constitutions

    Open Access•Brian Kogelmann•Public Choice•2023

  • On the People's Terms

    Philipp Schink•The Philosophical Review•2017

  • The epistemic quality of expert bodies

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Johan Christensen•Acta Politica•2024

  • Sortition and cognitive ability

    Open Access•Brian Kogelmann•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2026

  • Disentangling Referendums and Direct Democracy

    Alice El-Wakil, Spencer Mckay•Representation•2020

  • What’s wrong with an epistocratic council

    Open Access•Pierre‐étienne Vandamme•Politics•2020

  • Combining Citizen Participation and Expert Analysis

    Michael Brydon, Aidan R Vining•Local Government Studies•2016

  • Epistemic democracy and the role of experts

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander•Contemporary Political Theory•2019

  • Voting secrecy and the right to justification

    Open Access•Pierre‐étienne Vandamme•Constellations•2018

  • La délibération démocratique à l'Assemblée athénienne

    Open Access•Mirko Canevaro•Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales•2019

  • Constitutional Origins and Liberal Democracy

    Open Access•Gabriel L Negretto, Mariano Sánchez-Talanquer•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Moderation as Government

    Open Access•Thomas Osborne•The European Legacy•2023

  • Majority Rule

    Open Access•Stéphanie Novak•Philosophy Compass•2014

  • Secrecy and transparency in political philosophy

    Open Access•Brian Kogelmann•Philosophy Compass•2021

  • Vigilance and Confidence

    Open Access•Jonathan R Bruno•American Political Science Review•2017

  • L'autonomie de la recherche scientifique en débats

    Open Access•Clémentine Gozlan•Sociologie du Travail•2015

Citations per year3.92
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Highly citedNo
Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae