Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tension points in real social science

A response

Bibliographic Data

ID7092577
AuthorsBent Flyvbjerg (0000-0001-9093-770X, Said Business School University of Oxford), Todd Landman (0000-0002-0281-7263, Universiy of Essex), F Schram (0000-0002-3158-9941, Hunter College), Sanford Schram (Hunter College CUNY)
Year2013
Volume64
Issue4
Pages758-762
Publication date2013-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1315 • E-ISSN: 1468-4446
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-4446.12047_4
OpenAlexW2122862098
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited4

Social science today often contents itself with trying to explain particular events in terms of general models without understanding those events as experienced by the people being studied and without providing findings that might help people address the problems they are experiencing.It can be argued that the recent development of social science has focused too much on its own 'evidence--inference methodological core' and has lost sight of what is being studied, who is being studied, and how the results of research can challenge popular understanding, misconceptions, and power relations.At the most basic level, our edited volume Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis (Cambridge, 2012) is designed to provide examples of research that is situated in real communities, grows out of the concerns of people in those communities and is conducted in ways that can help those people address those concerns.These examples demonstrate that what we are calling "phronetic social science" (as originally coined by Bent Flyvbjerg) offers a meaningful approach for making social science useful and relevant to real people experiencing real problems.Phronetic social science calls for social scientists foregoing the attempt to build generic models of social behavior and instead situate their work in ongoing political struggles as they occur in specific contexts

Physics · Sociology · Tension (geology · Thermodynamics · Critical Realism in Sociology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Science and Policy Research

  • Resisting detached abstraction and universality

    Open Access•Eungyu Lee•Human Geography•2026

  • Bridging barriers to lean construction adoption in megaprojects

    Open Access•Abdelazim Ibrahim, Tarek Zayed et al.•Environment Development and…•2025

  • Exploring within the ‘black-box’ of leadership to make sense of the performative dynamics of conversation

    Open Access•Kosheek Sewchurran, Luciano Zaina et al.•Leadership•2019

  • The making of good public plans Phronesis, Phronetic Planning Research and Assemblage Thinking

    Open Access•Helen Briassoulis•Planning Theory•2022

  • A Comprehensive Model for Lean Construction Practices for Sustainable Megaproject Delivery

    Open Access•Abdelazim Ibrahim, Tarek Zayed et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Sweet dreams? Testing prognostics and reinterpreting sugarcane ethanol biofuel in Brazil

    Open Access•André Sica De Campos, D Tyfield et al.•Tapuya Latin American Science…•2024

  • Real Social Science

    Open Access•F Schram, A W Frank et al.•Real Social Science•2012

  • Phronesis and the participants' perspective

    Open Access•Brian Caterino•British Journal of Sociology•2013

  • Spatializing phronesis

    Open Access•Edward W Soja•British Journal of Sociology•2013

  • What really matters

    Open Access•John Gunnell, John G Gunnell•British Journal of Sociology•2013

Citations per year0.86
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae