Using protection motivation theory to explain Australian's motivations to engage in individual and collective climate actions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7147635 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew I Mackay (0000-0003-1821-4923, School of Psychology Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia, corresponding author), Alexander Klas (0000-0002-6590-5164, School of Psychology Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia), Anna Klas, Julian W Fernando (0000-0002-3409-8822, Deakin University), Julian Fernando (School of Psychology Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia), Emily J Kothe (School of Psychology Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia), Emily Kothe (0000-0003-1210-0554, Deakin University), Mathew Ling (0000-0002-0940-2538, School of Psychology Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Journal Of Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1367-2223 • E-ISSN: 1467-839X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ajsp.12660 |
| OpenAlex | W4405840147 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 70 |
Using an Australian sample, the current study investigated the usefulness of protection motivation theory (PMT) in predicting intentions for two climate actions—one individual action (limiting household heating and/or cooling) and one collective action (writing a letter to a local Member of Parliament urging them to take action to mitigate climate change). The data were analysed in two ways: (1) regression analysis, to examine the independent effects of coping and threat appraisals, and (2) latent profile analysis (LPA), to understand how the coping and threat appraisals may act in combination. The regression showed that PMT explained a significant amount of variance for both behavioural intentions. While perceived response efficacy and self‐efficacy were significant unique predictors of both behavioural intentions, perceived response costs were a significant unique predictor of heating and/or cooling intentions. Although the regression analysis suggests that people were more motivated by coping appraisals for both outcomes, the LPA indicates that the coping appraisals are unlikely to lead to stronger intentions unless individuals perceive climate change to be sufficiently threatening. PMT research could benefit from employing LPA to identify participant profiles with heightened likelihoods of reporting stronger intentions to participate in climate actions
Collective action · Limiting · Perception · Political science · Politics · Regression analysis · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Clinical Psychology · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Psychology · Social Psychology
Protection motivation theory and pro‐environmental behaviour
Understanding online safety behaviors
Communication and Marketing As Climate Change–Intervention Assets
The genesis of climate change activism
Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action
Collective climate action
Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions
A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation
Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review
Measuring pro-environmental behavior
Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change
A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals
The theory of planned behavior
Welcome to the Tidyverse
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour
Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis.
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1
A systematic review of the outcomes of sustained environmental collective action
Tipping points
Beliefs and Denials About Climate Change
The climate mitigation gap
Multiple emotions
Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States
Understanding (and Reducing) Inaction on Climate Change
Hope and climate change
Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Behaviors in Tourism – A Perception Study of Asian Visitors from a Protection Motivation Theory Perspective
Reorienting Climate Change Communication for Effective Mitigation
Different shades of green? Unpacking habitual and occasional pro-environmental behavior
Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands
Fear of climate change consequences and predictors of intentions to alter meat consumption
Behavioural determinants of an individual's intention to adapt to climate change
At what sample size do correlations stabilize
New Environmental Theories
Protection motivation and self-efficacy
The dragons of inaction
Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behaviors of American and Korean Students
Using Political Efficacy Messages to Increase Climate Activism
Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants
How psychology can help limit climate change
A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism
To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour
Predicting intention to receive a seasonal influenza vaccination using Protection Motivation Theory
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |