Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Developmental differences in L1 and L2 text comprehension

An ERP study

Bibliographic Data

ID7148398
AuthorsAna I Pérez, Ana Isabel García Pérez (0000-0002-3211-231X, Universidad de Granada, corresponding author), Nuria Montoro (Universidad de Granada), Almudena Ortega (0000-0002-8364-229X), Carmen Aguirre (0000-0003-0373-861X, Universidad de Granada), Giulia Togato (0000-0003-2280-1856, Universidad de Granada), María-Teresa Bajo (0000-0003-2996-8261, Universidad de Granada), Ma Teresa Bajo
Year2025
Volume271
Pages105644
Publication date2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBrain and Language (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-934X • E-ISSN: 1090-2155
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105644
PMID41016178
OpenAlexW4414624825
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited38

Text comprehension relies on high-level cognitive processes. These processes might be challenging for young readers, especially when comprehension takes place in a non-native language, an issue that remains unexplored. Twenty-four children and twenty-six adolescent early sequential bilinguals, were presented with narratives in L1-Spanish and L2-English. Each text biased an initial inference ("baby"), which then required either literal ("The little cat...") or inferential ("The little animal - meow...") monitoring. Processing times at this sentence suggested less efficient comprehension monitoring in the L2, mainly with inferential information. Moreover, in a final sentence, either literal or inferential (depending on the previous sentence) revision was assessed by ERP to a disambiguating word ("cat"). N400 amplitude showed that adolescents semantically integrated the alternative concept into their situation model only in the native language, but not during L2 comprehension. Crucially, children struggled to do so in both languages. In contrast, the P600 suggested that children in the native language and adolescents in both languages performed semantic reanalyses by reducing interference from the no longer valid initial interpretation. Our findings indicate a complex interplay between development and bilingualism in the ability to revise a situation model during text comprehension

Cognition · Comprehension · Inference · Literal (mathematical logic) · N400 · Narrative · Neuroscience of multilingualism · P600 · Semantics (computer science) · Sentence · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Reading and Literacy Development

  • The Simple View of Reading as a cognitive framework for multilingual reading comprehension assessment

    Open Access•Naila Fethi, Krisztián Józsa•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span

    Open Access•Robbie Case, D Midian Kurland et al.•Journal of Experimental Child…•1982

  • Reading Senseless Sentences

    Open Access•Marta Kutas, Steven A Hillyard•Science•1980

  • Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Michael Stevens•Journal of Cognition•2018

  • Children's Reading Comprehension Ability

    Kate Cain, Jane Oakhill et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2004

  • Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test--Fourth Edition

    Lloyd M Dunn, Douglas M Dunn•PsycTESTS Dataset•2012

  • Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Amy Beth Warriner et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2014

  • Language history questionnaire

    Open Access•Ping Li, Sara Sepanski et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2006

  • The Acquisition of Reading Comprehension Skill

    Charles A Perfetti, Charles Perfetti et al.•The Science of Reading: A Handbook•2008

  • Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words

    Open Access•Victor Kuperman, Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2012

  • Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children

    Open Access•Kate Cain, Jane Oakhill et al.•Reading and Writing•1999

  • Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing

    Open Access•Christine M Weber-Fox, Christine Weber‐Fox et al.•Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience•1996

  • LmerTest Package

    Open Access•Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B Brockhoff et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Inferential evaluation and revision in L1 and L2 text comprehension

    Open Access•Ana Isabel García Pérez, Elaine Schmidt et al.•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2024

  • Validation and Comprehension

    Panayiota Kendeou•Discourse Processes•2014

  • Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly

    Open Access•Lee Osterhout, Phillip J Holcomb•Journal of Memory and Language•1992

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae